CS Executive Limitation Act, 1963
Period of limitation
This is the period during which, a suit can be filed or a case initiated in a court of law. Different periods have been prescribed for different matters and issues, as per the Limitation Act. For example, if it is a matter of a tort, one can approach the courts within three years, if it is a matter related to mortgages, the period of limitation is sixty years, and so on.
Effect of acknowledgment in Limitation Act, 1963
A fresh period of limitation begins from the date of acknowledgment of liability with regard to any property or right.
Extension of limitation period in Limitation Act, 1963
Extension of limitation period is covered under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which covers the Doctrine of Sufficient Cause. It provides for the period of limitation being extended in case the plaintiff was hindered by a cause serious enough to have prevented him from initiating proceedings.
Continuous Running of Time in Limitation Act, 1963
Once the calculation or counting of time starts, it shall not be discontinued by any ensuing disability or incapacity that arises. This condition will hold true only when and if the same conditions persist; when the cause of action has been taken away or a right altered, the very reason for calculation of the limitation period fails.
Bar of limitation in Limitation Act, 1963
Bar of limitation implies that a person is given the right to approach the courts in any matter within a set time frame. Beyond that, it is not that his legal right regarding that matter extinguishes; it is just that the courts will not be able to help him in that matter anymore.
Learn and Read More CS Executive JIGL Question and Answers
Persons under legal disability in Limitation Act, 1963
These are people who are unable to approach the courts within the limitation period because of some legal requirements that they cannot currently or ever fulfill.
The effect of part payment on limitation period in Limitation Act, 1963
A fresh limitation period begins from the date of part payment or the payment of interest on a debt. The original limitation period stands extended when part payment occurs.
Doctrine of sufficient cause in Limitation Act, 1963
This doctrine covers grounds on which, the limitation period can be extended. It can be on the grounds of a legal or physical disability, for example, if the person needs to submit some papers to be obtained from a government department that are not received on time, the limitation period can be extended, as that is not something within his control.
CS Executive Limitation Act, 1963 Descriptive Questions
Question 1: Explain the ‘doctrine of sufficient cause’ for condonation of delay as provided in section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Answer:
The ‘doctrine of sufficient cause’ for condonation of delay as provided in section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963
Extension of limitation period is covered under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which covers the Doctrine of Sufficient Cause. It provides for the period of limitation being extended in case the plaintiff was hindered by a cause serious enough to have prevented him from initiating proceedings.
In this case, while going to the court, Amar met with an accident, which prevented him from presenting the plaint in time. Now he filed an application for condonation of the delay on grounds of sufficient cause.
Under Section 5, ‘sufficient cause’ is seen as something of a serious nature that prevents the person concerned from initiating or carrying on the proceedings within the required or prescribed time.
He cannot claim extension of time, as the Section does not apply to suits and to applications made under Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908.
Question 2: Comment the following: Computation of period of limitation for an appeal or an application for leave to appeal.
Answer:
Computation of period of limitation for an appeal or an application for leave to appeal
Sections 12 to 19 and Section 24, which are contained in Part III of the Limitation Act, 1963, titled “Computation of Period of Limitation”, provide the details for this.
They are as under -Section 12 It says that the time required for filing a suit, appeal or application, either against a decree or order or otherwise, is exclusive of the day from which the limitation period is calculated.
Moreover, the time needed for obtaining a copy of the order being appealed against is also to be excluded.
The following are to be excluded while calculating this period –
In calculating the period of limitation for any suit, appeal or application, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be excluded.
In computing the period of limitation for an appeal or an application for to leave to appeal or for revision or for review of a judgment, the day on which the judgment was pronounced and the time required for obtaining a copy of the decree, sentence or order appealed from shall be excluded.
Where a decree or order is appealed from for sought to be revised or reviewed, or where an application is made for leave to appeal from a decree or order, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the judgment 45 on which the decree or order is based or from which it is sourced, shall be excluded.ad wow
In computing the period of limitation for an application to set aside an award, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the award shall be excluded.
However, in computing under this section the time requisite for obtaining a copy of a decree or an order, any time taken by the court to prepare the decree or order before an application for a copy thereof is made shall not be excluded.
Question 3: The Law of Limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963 bars the remedy but it does not extinguish the right. Explain in brief.
Answer:
The Law of Limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963 bars the remedy but it does not extinguish the right
The law relating to limitation is incorporated in the Limitation Act, 1963, which prescribes different periods of limitation for suits, petitions or applications. In the case of Bombay Dying & Mfg. Co. Ltd. v.
State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 328 the Supreme Court held that the Law of limitation bars the remedy in a Court of law only when the period of limitation has expired, but it does
not extinguish the right that it cannot be enforced by judicial process.
Thus if a claim is satisfied outside the Court of law after the expiry of period of limitation, that is not illegal.
Section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides that any suit, appeal or application if made beyond the prescribed period of limitation, it is the duty. of the Court not to proceed with such suits irrespective of the fact whether the plea of limitation has been set up in defence or not, The provisions of Section 3 are mandatory.
The Court can suo motu take note of question of limitation. The question whether a suit is barred by limitation should be decided on the facts as they stood on the date of presentation of the plaint.
Question 4: What is the effect of acknowledgment on the period of limitation? Discuss.
Answer:
The effect of acknowledgment on the period of limitation
Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 deals with the effect of acknowledgment of liability in respect of property or right on the period of limitation.
The Court might then overlook the delay and accept the application in all regularity, as if it were submitted within the specified time. However, this power is a discretionary power, only to be exercised by the Courts where they feel that the case so warrants.
Question 5: Describe in brief the provisions of Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 regarding the effect of payment on account of debt or of interest on legacy.
Answer:
The provisions of Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 regarding the effect of payment on account of debt or of interest on legacy
Section 18 This section states that in case of an acknowledgment regarding any property or right in relation to which any claim has been made against him, a fresh period of limitation will commence from the date of such acknowledgment.
The effect of acknowledgment as per Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, is to extend the period of limitation. A fresh period of limitation begins from the date of acknowledgment of liability with regard to any property or right.
The only conditions are that the person signing the acknowledgment has to give it in writing and it has to be regarding a claim of a property or right against him. In order to bind him, it has to have the effects of an admission.
Section 19 This records the cases of a debt or interest on legacy, on account of which if interest is paid, it results in a fresh period of limitation commencing from the date of such payment.
According to Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a fresh limitation period begins from the date of part payment or the payment of interest on a debt. The original limitation period stands extended when part payment occurs, but the payment has to take place within the original period of limitation applicable on the debt.
For this to happen, an acknowledgment given by the creditor is mandatory, as proof of part payment.
Question 6: The decision of a Court allowing a suit which had been instituted after the period prescribed is not vitiated for want of jurisdiction. Discuss it in the light of provisions under section 3 relating to Bar of Limitation under Limitation Act, 1963.
Answer:
Bar of Limitation – Decision of a court
Bar of limitation: Bar of limitation implies that a person is given the right to approach the courts in any matter within a set timeframe. Beyond that, it is not that his legal right regarding that matter extinguishes; it is just that the courts will not be able to help him in that matter anymore.
If he is able to settle the matter out of court i.e. through arbitration, conciliation etc., he will definitely still be within his bounds. Hence, in civil matters, the law of Limitation provides a limit to the time within which courts can be approached. Section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Moreover, it is based on the principle that the law cannot and will not protect people who are themselves not vigilant about their rights. (Vigilantibus non domientibus jur A subventiunt).
The Limitation Act, 1963 provides for fixed periods of time for different civil and criminal proceedings that take place in a court of law. It covers all suits, petitions and applications. The intention of this Act is to put a limit to the period when the remedy is available to the aggrieved.
However, it does not bar the right, but merely the remedy. The Limitation Act, 1963 has been made keeping public policy in mind, and the general principles of “repose, peace and justice” as per the Supreme Court case of Prashar vs.
Vasantsen. This indicates that the statute of limitation is used to limit the number of cases with the courts, by limiting at least those that have become stale by crossing the limits of time within which they should have been initiated.
Moreover as per the general principles of justice, law should support those who are alert as to their rights and exercise them within the required period.
Hence, this statute is for establishing a limit to the time within which an aggrieved can apply for a remedy enforced by a court, thus freeing the courts of an endless duty to accept cases as and when they are filed.
Hence, the decision of a court allowing a suit after the limitation period is not vitiated for want of jurisdiction.
Question 7: What is the effect of acknowledgment on the period of limitation under the section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963? Explain.
Answer:
The effect of acknowledgment on the period of limitation under the section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963
The effect of acknowledgement as per Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, is to extend the period of limitation. A fresh period of limitation begins from the date of acknowledgement of liability with regard to any property or right.
The only conditions are that the person signing the acknowledgement has to give it in writing and it has to be regarding a claim of a property or right against him. In order to bind him, it has to have the effects of an admission.
This section states that in case of an acknowledgement regarding any property or right in relation to which any claim has been made against him, a fresh period of limitation will commence from the date of such acknowledgement. The effect of acknowledgement as per Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, is to extend the period of limitation.
A fresh period of limitation begins from the date of acknowledgement of liability with regard to any property or right. The only conditions are that the person signing the acknowledgement has to give it in writing and it has to be regarding a claim of a property or right against him.
In order to bind him, it has to have the effects of an admission.
Question 8: What is maximum and minimum period of limitation prescribed by Limitation Act, 1963 and also state that in which kind of suits it is provided?
Answer:
Period of limitation: This is the period during which, a suit can be filed or a case initiated in a court of law. Different periods have been prescribed for different matters and issues, as per the Limitation Act.
For example, if it is a matter of a tort, one can approach the courts within three years, if it is a matter related to mortgages, the period of limitation is sixty years, and so on. The prescribed limitation periods for various purposes are as under:
- 30 years- This is the maximum period of limitation prescribed by the Limitation Act; provided only for three kinds of suits
- Suits by mortgagors for the redemption or recovery of possession of immovable property mortgaged;
- Suits by mortgagee for foreclosure;
- Suits by or on behalf of the Central Government or any State Government including the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
- 12 years For various kinds of suits relating to immovable property, trusts and endowments.
- 3 years – For suits relating to accounts, contracts, and declaratory suits, suits relating to decrees and instruments and suits relating to movable property.
- 3 years – For suits relating to torts and other miscellaneous matters and suits for which no period of limitation is provided in the Schedule to the Act.
- 90 to 10 days – This category has the following distinctions –
- 10 days from the date of service of the summons – For application for leave to appear and defend a suit under summary procedure.
- 30 days For appeals against a sentence of death passed by a court of session or a High Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction.
- 60 days – For appeal to High Court against any sentence other than a sentence of death or any order not being an order of acquittal.
- 30 days – For appeal to any other Court against any sentence other than a sentence of death or any order not being an order of acquittal.
- 60 days from the date of the decree – To appeal in forma pauperies to the High Court.
- 30 days from the date of the decree – To appeal in forma pauperies to any other Court.
Hence, the maximum period of limitation is 30 years and the minimum period of limitation is 10 days, under the Act.
CS Executive Limitation Act, 1963 Practical Questions
Question 1: The driver of a petrol lorry, while transferring petrol from the lorry to an underground tank at a garage, struck a matchstick in order to light a cigarette and then threw it, still alight on the floor. An explosion and a fire ensued. Who is liable for the damage so caused? Decide giving case law on this point.
Answer:
This case pertains to the Law of Torts, i.e. the law pertaining to vicarious liability. Under these rules, the principal is liable for the wrongs of his agents, based on the maxim –
Qui facit per alium facit per se (He who acts through an agent acts himself, i.e.
Even if someone is acting through an agent, and the agent is acting as per the principal’s directions, it can be assumed that the principal is acting himself). In this case, the employer will be liable for the acts of his agent, i.e. the driver.
This matches the case of Century Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Northern Ireland Road Transport Board, in which it was decided that the driver although doing an authorized work, was doing it in an unauthorized manner.
This will not, however, exempt the employer and the employer will be held liable for the wrong of the driver.
Question 2: Manoj died on 3rd August, 2016 before a right to institute a suit accrued, leaving behind a minor son of the age of 15 years. Decide the time from where the period of limitation shall be calculated under Limitation Act, 1963.
Answer:
Persons under legal disability:
These are people who are unable to approach the Courts within the limitation period because of some legal requirements that they cannot currently or ever fulfill. E.g. A minor, who cannot by himself file a suit till he attains majority, a person who is mentally incapable, etc.
As per Section 6 of the Limitation Act, 1963, persons under legal disabilities can approach Courts within a specific time period. Sections 7 and 8 supplement Section 6 by providing for the disability of one of several persons and the exceptions respectively.
The effect of all these sections taken together is that in situations where the period of limitation expires before the disability ceases, a fresh period of limitation begins from when the disability ends.
For example, a minor gains a fresh period of disability from when he attains to majority. w. evig of Also, Section 16 of the Act provides for such a situation – If a person dies before he can institute a suit, the right shall not lapse and shall be construed from a legal representative of the deceased can be made available for instituting the suit.
Hence, in this case, the period of limitation would be calculated from when the minor comes of age.
CS Executive Limitation Act, 1963 Descriptive Questions
Question.1: What is the effect on Limitation Period in case of part payment?
Answer:
The effect on Limitation Period in case of part payment
According to Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a fresh limitation period begins from the date of part payment or the payment of interest on a debt.
The original limitation period stands extended when part payment occurs, but the payment has to take place within the original period of limitation applicable on the debt. For this to happen, an acknowledgment given by the creditor is mandatory, as proof of part payment.
Question.2: Can the Limitation Period be extended? Under what circumstances is it possible?
Answer:
Extension of limitation period and the Doctrine of Sufficient Cause Extension of limitation period is covered under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which covers the Doctrine of Sufficient Cause.
It provides for the period of limitation being extended in case the plaintiff was hindered by a cause serious enough to have prevented him from initiating proceedings. In this case, while going to the court, Amar met with an accident, which prevented him from presenting the plaint in time.
Now he filed an application for condonation of the delay on grounds of sufficient cause. Under Section 5, ‘sufficient cause’ is seen as something of a serious nature that prevents the person concerned from initiating or carrying on the proceedings within the required or prescribed time.
He cannot claim extension of time, as the Section does not apply to suits and to applications made under Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Space to write important points for revision
Question.3: What is the Bar of limitation in Limitation Act, 1963?
Answer:
Bar of limitation in Limitation Act, 1963 – Bar of limitation implies that a person is given the right to approach the courts in any matter within a set timeframe. Beyond that, it is not that his legal right regarding that matter extinguishes; it is just that the courts will not be able to help him in that matter anymore.
If he is able to settle the matter out of court i.e. through arbitration, conciliation etc., he will definitely still be within his bounds. Hence, in civil matters, the law of Limitation provides a limit to the time within which courts can be approached, Moreover, it is based on the principle that the law cannot and will not protect people who are themselves not vigilant about their rights. (Vigilantibus non domientibus jur A subventiunt).
Persons under legal disability in Limitation Act, 1963These are people who are unable to approach the courts within the limitation period because of some legal requirements that they cannot currently or ever fulfill. E.g. A minor, who cannot by himself file a suit till he attains majority, a person who is mentally incapable, etc.
Continuous running of time in Limitation Act, 1963 – The limitation period, once it starts to run, is recorded continuously. What is means is that once the limitation period starts,there are no stoppages to it;the advent of the limitation period culminates only when it finishes.
Question.4: Define Limitation Period. What is the purpose for defining it?
Limitation Period in Limitation Act, 1963
The Limitation Act, 1963 provides for fixed periods of time for different civil and criminal proceedings that take place in a court of law. It covers all suits, petitions and applications. The intention of this Act is to put a limit to the period when the remedy is available to the aggrieved.
However, it does not bar the right, but merely the remedy. The Limitation Act, 1963 has been made keeping public policy in mind, and the general principles of “repose, peace and justice” as per the Supreme Court case of Prashar vs. Vasantsen.
This indicates that the statute of limitation is used to limit the number of cases with the courts, by limiting at least those that have become stale by crossing the limits of time within which they should have been initiated.
Moreover as per the general principles of justice, law should support those who are alert as to their rights and exercise them within the required period. Hence, this statute is for establishing a limit to the time within which an aggrieved can apply for a remedy enforced by a court, thus freeing the courts of an endless duty to accept cases as and when they are filed.
Question.5: What are the rules regarding the calculation of Limitation Period?
Answer:
Calculation of Limitation Period in Limitation Act, 1963
Section 9 of the Limitation Act, 1963 says that once the calculation or counting of time starts, it shall not be discontinued by any ensuing disability or incapacity that arises can stop the running of time.
This condition will hold true only when and if the same conditions persist; when the cause of action has been taken away or a right altered, the very reason for calculation of the limitation period fails. This is known as Continuous Running of Time.
Applicability in Limitation Act, 1963 :
It applies to cases where the cause of action continues; when that is varied, a fresh period of limitation will begin from the date of variation.
This Section applies only to suits and applications, and not to appeals, which are generally allowed unless expressly covered under some other section. Cases of property being vested in trusts and in legal representatives will be included only in the instance of the property being vested for a specific purpose.
Sections 12 to 19 and Section 24, which are contained in Part III of the Limitation Act, 1963, titled “Computation of Period of Limitation”, provide the details for this. They are as under –
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 12 It says that the time required for filing a suit, appeal or application, either against a decree or order or otherwise, is exclusive of the day from which the limitation period is calculated. Moreover, the time needed for obtaining a copy of the order being appealed against is also to be excluded.
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 13 – The time during which the suit for being adjudged a pauper is applied for but not decided.
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 14- The period that was taken by a court that had no jurisdiction on a matter that was under question, and the plaintiff had applied to that court in the mistaken belief that it had power to entertain that suit.
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 15- Under this Section certain other situation in which there would be an extension of time in calculating the period of limitation are given. For example, in case of the defendant being out of India and arriving after the suit has been instituted, only the time when he is in India shall be included.
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 16 – In case the plaintiff’s right to appeal is hindered by his death, the period shall be calculated from the time when there is a representative appointed for the plaintiff.
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 17 – In case the suit or application has been initiated on the basis of some fraud, the period of limitation would be counted from the date when the fraud is discovered.
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 18 This section states that in case of an acknowledgment regarding any property or right in relation to which any claim has been made against him, a fresh period of limitation will commence from the date of such acknowledgment.
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 19 This records the cases of a debt or interest on legacy, on account of which if interest is paid, it results in a fresh period of limitation commencing from the date of such payment.
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 24- all periods shall be calculated in accordance with the standard Gregorian calendar.
Question 6: Explain the Doctrine of Sufficient Cause.
Answer:
The Doctrine of Sufficient Cause
The Doctrine of Sufficient Cause It provides for the period of limitation being extended in case the plaintiff was hindered by a cause serious enough to have prevented him from initiating proceedings.
‘Sufficient cause’ implies a cause relevant and serious enough as to cause an extension of the time required to conduct the legal action.
This doctrine is provided in Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which says that any appeal or application may be admitted after the prescribed period if the appellant or the applicant is able to prove to the satisfaction of the court that he had sufficient cause for not filing the appeal or making the application within such period.
This extension does not apply to an application under any of the provisions of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
The following would count as sufficient cause
If the appellant misinterprets a court order, practice or judgment, he might have issues in computing the period. However, the Court cannot admit a time barred suit. It does provide though, that the prescribed period should be over.
- It must be a cause which is beyond the control of the party. In Ramlal v. Rewa Coal Fields Ltd., the Supreme Court decided that “once the period of limitation expires then the appellant has to explain the delay made thereafter for day by day and if he is unable to explain the delay even for a single day, it would be deemed that the party did not have sufficient cause for delay.”
- It is a discretionary power of the Court to extend or not to extend the period of limitation even after sufficient cause has been proven.
- Wrong practice of High Court which misled the appellant or his counsel in not filing the appeal can safely be regarded as sufficient cause. In some cases, bona fide mistake of counsel may be taken into consideration for constructing sufficient cause.
- Wrong advice given by advocate Mistaken establishment or exercising of the right given by law may be considered as sufficient cause; ignorance of law will not be considered a valid excuse. Similarly, negligence of the party or the legal adviser may not always constitute a sufficient cause.
- Imprisonment or serious illness of the party may be considered as a valid reason. Time taken for acquiring certified copies of the decree or the judgment against which the appeal is to be filed.
- Non-availability of the case file to the State counsel or Panel lawyer is not a valid ground for delay. Ailment of father during which he required the care of appellant is held to be a sufficient and genuine cause.
It is to be kept in mind that the quasi-judicial tribunals, labour courts or executive authorities have no power to extend the period under this Section; this power is afforded only to courts.
Question.7: How is the period of limitation applicable to acquisition of ownership by possession?
Answer:
Acquisition of Ownership of Easements by Possession
Section 25 indirectly provides for the same. It is applicable to acquisition of easements and says that if the right to access and use of light or air or water, access way, watercourse, pathway or any other easement which has been peaceably enjoyed without interruption for twenty years (thirty years in case the property belongs to Government) acquisition of ownership by possession shall be absolute and indefeasible.
The following are some of the easements that can be acquired under this Section, as derived from cases that elucidate the Section –
- A right of fishing in another’s waters. (Lokenath v. Jahnia Bibi).
- The right to ply a ferry over the property of another. (Parmeshari v. Mahomed).
- The right of pasture over the landlord’s wastelands by long term user. (Bholanath v. Midnapur Zemindary).
- A right to the supply of water from a natural stream may be acquired by 20 years’ use under Section 25. (Abdul Rahman v. Muhammad Alam). Space to write important points for revision
Question.8: How does the period of limitation apply to writs?
Answer:
Limitation and writs under the constitution
This is covered under Entry 13, List III of the Constitution of India. This Entry gives the Legislature the authority to prescribe limitation periods for various purposes, without violating the Fundamental Rights.
This does not limit the access to legal remedy; it merely makes the appellant more vigilant, so that actions are given definite timeframes and the aggrieved takes prompt action for redressal, making it easier for the courts as well.
However, there is no bar of limitation on the aggrieved approaching the Supreme Court under Article 32 for filing a writ petition, or approaching a High Court under Article 226 for the same purpose.
In accepting such applications though, the courts do have regard for the promptness displayed by the applicant in seeking remedy. In case of inordinate and unexplained delay, they might refuse to accept the application on grounds of limitation.
(Tilokchand Motichand v. H.P. Munshi, State of M.P. v. Bhai Lal Bhai). Where a corresponding remedy is available in an ordinary that is subject to the bar of limitation, the Court usually
imposes the same limitation in the writ jurisdiction also.
Question.9: Explain the classification of period of limitation.
Answer:
Classification of period of limitation
The prescribed limitation periods for various purposes are as under:
- 30 years This is the maximum period of limitation prescribed by the Limitation Act; provided only for three kinds of suits –
- Suits by mortgagors for the redemption or recovery of possession of immovable property mortgaged;
- Suits by mortgagee for foreclosure;
- Suits by or on behalf of the Central Government or any State Government including the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
- 12 years For various kinds of suits relating to immovable property, trusts and endowments.
- 3 years – For suits relating to accounts, contracts, and declaratory suits, suits relating to decrees and instruments and suits relating to movable property.
- 1 to 3 years – For suits relating to torts and other miscellaneous matters and suits for which no period of limitation is provided in the Schedule to the Act.
- 90 to 10 days – This category has the following distinctions –
- 10 days from the date of service of the summons – For application for leave to appear and defend a suit under summary procedure.
- 30 days For appeals against a sentence of death passed by a court of session or a High Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction.
- 60 days – For appeal to High Court against any sentence other than a sentence of death or any order not being an order of acquittal.
- 30 days – For appeal to any other Court against any sentence other than a sentence of death or any order not being an order of acquittal.
- 60 days from the date of the decree – To appeal in forma pauperies to the High Court.
- 30 days from the date of the decree – To appeal in forma pauperies to any other Court.