CS Company Law Transparency And Disclosures Question and Answers

Transparency And Disclosures

The annual report is a comprehensive report provided by most public companies to disclose their corporate activities over the past year. The report is typically issued to shareholders and other stakeholders who use it to evaluate the firm’s performance including both operating and financial highlights.

Such annual report shall contain the following:

  • audited financial statements i.e. balance sheets, profit and loss accounts etc, and Statement on Impact of Audit Qualifications, if applicable;
  • consolidated financial statements audited by its statutory auditors;
  • cash flow statement presented only under the indirect method as prescribed in Accounting Standard-3 or Indian Accounting Standard 7, as applicable, specified in Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013
  • directors report;
  • management discussion and analysis report – either as a part of directors report or addition thereto;
  • for the top five hundred listed entities based on market capitalization

Board’s Report in Companies Act, 2013

The Board’s Report is the most important means of communication by the Board of Directors of a company with its shareholders. It is a comprehensive document which serves to inform the shareholders about the performance and various other aspects of the company, its major policies, relevant changes in management, future programmes of expansion, modernization and diversification, capitalization or reserves, etc.

It is mandatory for the Board of Directors of every company to present financial statement to the shareholders along with its report, known as the “Board’s Report” at every annual general meeting.

Disclosure in Board’s Report pursuant to the Companies Act, 2013

  • Disclosures under Section 134(3)
  • Details of Employees Stock Option Scheme – section 62(1)(b)
  • Voluntary revision of Financial Statements or Board’s Report- Section 131(1)
  • Resignation of Director – Section 168(1)
  • Issue of Equity Shares with differential rights
  • Restrictions on purchase by company or giving of loans by it for
  • Corporate Social Responsibility – Section 135
  • Composition of Audit Committee – Section 177(8)
  • Issue of Sweat Equity Shares
  • Disclosures pertaining to Consolidated Financial Statements
  • Re-Appointments of an Independent Director – Section 149(10)
  • Details of Vigil Mechanism – Section 177(10)
  • Disclosures pertaining to remuneration of directors and employees – Section 197(12)
  • Policy relating to the remuneration for the directors, key managerial personnel and other employees – Section 178(4)
  • Remuneration received by MD and WTD from holding or subsidiary companies-Section 197(14)
  • Related party transactions – Section 188(2) (xvii) Secretarial Audit Report – Section 204(1)
  • Additional Disclosures by Producer Company

Signing of Board’s Report [Section 134(6)]

Company Law Transparency And Disclosures Board's Report

Annual Return in Companies Act, 2013

As per Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013, every company is required to prepare the Annual Return in Form No. MGT-7 containing the particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year. Annual Return is to be filed with the Registrar within 60 days from the date on which Annual General Meeting (AGM) is actually held or from the last day on which AGM should have been held.

  • As provided in sub-Section (2) of Section 384, the provisions of Section 92 regarding filing of annual return apply to a foreign company subject to such exceptions, modifications and adoptions as may be provided for in the Rules.
  • Rule 7 of the Companies (Registration of Foreign Companies) Rules, 2014 provides that every foreign company shall prepare and file, within a period of sixty days from the last day of its financial year, to the Registrar annual return in Form FC-4 along with fee, containing the particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year.

Signing of Annual Return in Companies Act, 2013

Under section 92(1) of the Act, the Annual Return is required to be signed both by a director and the Company Secretary, or where there is no Company Secretary, by a Company Secretary in Practice.

The Annual Return of One Person Company and Small Company shall be signed by the Company Secretary or where there is no company- secretary, by the director of the company. The Act authorises the Central Government.

CS Company Law Transparency And Disclosures

Website Disclosures in Companies Act, 2013

Companies Act, 2013 does not mandate companies to have an active website, but SEBI (LODR), 2015 requires all the listed entities shall maintain a functional website containing the following information about the listed entity:

  • details of its business;
  • financial information including complete copy of the annual report including balance sheet, profit and loss account, directors report etc;
  • email address for grievance redressal and other relevant details;
  • name of the debenture trustees with full contact details;
  • the information, report, notices, call letters, circulars, proceedings, etc. concerning non-convertible redeemable preference shares or non convertible debt securities;
  • all information and reports including compliance reports filed by the listed entity;

Transparency And Disclosures Short Notes

Question 1. Write a note on the following:

Directors’ responsibility statement in Companies Act, 2013

Answer:

Company Law Transparency And Disclosures Provisions of Section 134

Transparency And Disclosures Descriptive Questions

Question 1. The Directors’ Report of Ayush Ltd. for the financial year ended 31st March, 2012 has been dated 15th May, 2012, whereas the Auditors’ Report for the same period is dated 16th May, 2012. Is this in order? Explain.

Answer:

Company Law Transparency And Disclosures Date of Directors report and auditors report

Question 2. Narrate briefly the importance of Corporate Governance Report and also state who can certify such report.

Answer:

Company Law Transparency And Disclosures Companies that Required to submit Quarterly CGR

Question 3. The Board of directors of Charming Ltd. seek your advice on the matters to be included in the directors’ responsibility statement forming part of the company’s annual report to shareholders. As the Company Secretary of Charming Ltd., advise the Board.

Answer:

Company Law Transparency And Disclosures Provsions of Section 134 of Companies

Question 4. Comment on the following:

Every company is required to disclose the details of vigil mechanism in the Board Report.

Answer:

According to Section 177(9) of Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 7 of Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014 the following companies are required to establish a vigil mechanism for their directors and employees to report their genuine concerns or grievances.

  • Every listed company;
  • The Companies which accept deposits from the public;
  • The Companies which have borrowed money from banks and public financial institutions in excess of fifty crore rupees.

Further the sub-section (10) provides that the details of establishment of such mechanism shall be disclosed by the company on its website, if any, and in the Board’s report.

Question 5. What are the ‘related party disclosures’ required to be made by listed entities as per SEBI Regulations?

Answer:

According to SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, the Annual Report shall make certain provisions of Related Party Disclosures. Further as per Regulation 27(2) of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 details of all material transactions with related parties shall be disclosed along with the quarterly compliance report on corporate governance in the format as prescribed by the Board from time to time to the recognised Stock Exchange(s) within fifteen days from end of the quarter.

  • The listed entity shall make disclosures in compliance with the Accounting Standard on “Related Party Disclosures”.
  • The disclosure requirements shall be given below:-

Disclosures of amounts at the year end and the maximum amount of loans/advances/ investments outstanding during the year, in the books of accounts of:

  • Holding Company:-
    • Loans and advances in the nature of loans to subsidiaries by name and amount.
    • Loans and advances in the nature of loans to associates by name and amount.
    • Loans and advances in the nature of loans to firms/companies in which directors are interested by name and amount.
  • Subsidiary:-Same disclosures as applicable to the parent company in the accounts of subsidiary company.
  • Holding Company:- Investments by the loanee in the shares of parent company and subsidiary company, when the company has made a loan or advance in the nature of loan.

For the purpose of above disclosures directors’ interest shall have the same meaning as given in Section 184 of the Companies Act, 2013. Disclosures of transactions of the listed entity with any person or entity belonging to the promoter/promoter group which holds 10% or more shareholding in the listed entity, in the format specified in the relevant accounting standards for annual results.

Question 6. Comment on the following:

Annual Return is a significant document in relation to the company.

Answer:

Annual Return is an important document in relation to the company Annual Return is an important document for the stakeholders of a company as it provides a very exhaustively information about the different aspects of a company. It is perhaps the most significant document required’ to be filed by every company with the Registrar of Companies.

Apart from the Financial Statements, this is the only document to be mandatory filed with the Registrar of Companies, every year irrespective of any events/happenings in the company.

While the Financial Statements give information on the financial performance of a company, it is the Annual Return which gives substantial disclosure and greater insight into the non-financial matters of the company and the people entrusted with the management of the company.

Under Section 92(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 Annual Return contains the following information:

  • its registered office, principal business activities, particulars of its holding, subsidiary and associate companies;
  • its shares, debentures and other securities and shareholding pattern;
  • its indebtedness [omitted by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017)];
  • its members and debenture-holders along with changes therein since the close of the previous financial year;
  • its promoters, directors, key managerial personnel along with changes therein since the close of the previous financial year;
  • meetings of members or a class thereof, Board and its various committees along with attendance details;
  • remuneration of directors and key managerial personnel;
  • penalty or punishment imposed on the company, its directors or officers and details of compounding of offences and appeals made against such penalty or punishment;
  • matters relating to certification of compliances, disclosures as may be prescribed;
  • such other matters as may be prescribed.

Question 7. Comment on the following:

Every Company is required to comply the disclosure requirements under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 in their Board Report.

Answer:

Under Section 134 read with Rule 8(5) (x) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, every company except (Small Companies and One Person Companies) is required to include the following in its Director’s Report:

Statement that the company has complied with provisions relating to the constitution of Internal Complaints Committee under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013

Disclosure Requirements under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition & Redressal) Act, 2013

  • The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 is applicable to every workplace, establishment, company or organisation employing 10 or more employees irrespective of its location or nature of industry.
  • The said Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal Act,) 2013 provides for constitution of a Committee to be known as the “Internal Complaints Committee”.
  • Section 21 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 mandates that Internal Committee shall prepare an Annual Report
  • Section 22 of the said Act provides that the employer shall include in its report the number of cases filed, if any, and their disposal under this Act in the Annual Report.

As Per Rule 14 of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition & Redressal) Rules, 2013 provides that the annual report which the Complaints Committee is required to prepare under Section 21 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition & Redressal) Act, 2013 shall contain the following details:

  • Number of complaints of sexual harassment received in the year;
  • Number of complaints disposed off during the year;
  • Number of case’s pending for more than 90 days;
  • Number of workshops or awareness programme against sexual harassment carried out;
  • Nature of action taken by the employer or District Officer.

Question 8. Every company is required to have active website. Comment.

Answer:

The Companies Act, 2013 does not mandate companies to have an active website, but the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 requires that all listed entities shall maintain a functional website containing the basic information about the listed entity:

As per the provisions of the SEBI (LODR) Regulation, 2015, the listed entity shall disseminate the prescribed informations under a separate section on its website, including:

  • details of its business;
  • terms and conditions of appointment of independent directors;
  • composition of various committees of board of directors;
  • code of conduct of board of directors and senior management personnel;
  • details of establishment of vigil mechanism/ Whistle Blower policy;
  • criteria of making payments to non-executive directors, if the same has not been disclosed in annual report;
  • policy on dealing with related party transactions;
  • policy for determining ‘material’ subsidiaries;
  • details of familiarization programmes imparted to independent directors including the following details:-
    • number of programmes attended by independent directors (during the year and on a cumulative basis till date),
    • number of hours spent by independent directors in such programmes (during the year and on cumulative basis till date), and
    • other relevant details.
  • the email address for grievance redressal and other relevant details;
  • contact information of the designated officials of the listed entity who are responsible for assisting and handling investor grievances;
  • financial information including:
    • notice of meeting of the board of directors where financial results shall be discussed;
    • financial results, on conclusion of the meeting of the board of directors where the financial results were approved;
    • complete copy of the annual report including balance sheet, profit and loss account, directors report, corporate governance report etc.
  • shareholding pattern;
  • details of agreements entered into with the media companies and/or their associates, etc.;
  • the information, report, notices, call letters, circulars, proceedings, etc. concerning non- convertible redeemable preference shares or non-convertible debt securities;
  • all information and reports including compliance reports filed by the listed entity;
  • information with respect to the following events:
    • default by issuer to pay interest on or redemption amount;
    • failure to create a charge on the assets;
    • revision of rating assigned to the non-convertible debt securities.

It is important that the listed entity ensures the contents of the website are correct and updated at any given point of time.

Question 9. Comment on the following:

Signing of the Board’s Report can be done by any one of the directors and be filed within 60 days of AGM.

Answer:

As per Section 134(6) of the Companies Act, 2013, the Board’s report and any annexures thereto, shall be signed by the Chairperson of the company if he is authorised by the Board and where he is not so authorised, shall be signed by at least two directors, one of whom shall be a managing director, or by the director where there is one director.

As per Section 137(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 states that a copy of financial statements, including consolidated financial statement, if any, along with all documents required to be attached to such financial statements under the Companies Act, 2013, duly adopted at the annual general meeting (AGM) or adjourned annual general meeting of the company shall be filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within 30 days of annual general meeting or adjourned annual general meeting along with the prescribed fees.

The Board’s Report has to be attached to the financial statements. Although, where the financial statements are not adopted at annual general meeting (AGM) or adjourned annual general meeting, such unadopted financial statements along with the required documents shall be filed with the Registrar within thirty days of the date of annual general meeting.

In case of a One Person Company (OPC) a copy of the financial statements duly adopted by its member, along with all the documents which are required to be attached to such financial statements, shall be filed within one hundred eighty days from the closure of the financial year.

Transparency And Disclosures Practical Questions

Question 1. Pioneer Fisheries Ltd. has borrowed an amount of * 50 crore from a financial institution. The annual general meeting of the company was held on 1st September, 2015. Examining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, state as to who will sign and certify the annual return while filing the same with the Registrar of Companies after the annual general meeting. 

Answer:

Company Law Transparency And Disclosures Section 92

Question 2. Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017

Revised Section 92(1)-

“Every company shall prepare a return (hereinafter referred to as the annual return) in the prescribed form containing the particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year regarding:

  • its registered office, principal business activities, particulars of its holding, subsidiary and associate companies;
  • its shares, debentures and other securities and shareholding pattern;
  • its members and debenture-holders along with changes therein since the close of the previous financial year;
  • its promoters, directors, key managerial personnel along with changes therein since the close of the previous financial year;
  • meetings of members or a class thereof, Board and its various committees along with attendance details;
  • remuneration of directors and key managerial personnel;
  • penalty or punishment imposed on the company. its directors or officers and details of compounding of offences and appeals made against such penalty or punishment;
  • matters relating to certification of compliances, disclosures as may be prescribed;
  • details, as may be prescribed, in respect of shares held by or on behalf of the Foreign Institutional Investors; and
  • such other matters as may be prescribed, and signed by a director and the company secretary. or where there is no company secretary, by a company secretary in practice:

Provided that in relation to One Person Company, small company and such other class or classes of companies as may be prescribed, the annual return shall be signed by the company secretary, or where there is no company secretary, by the director of the company.

Provided further that the Central Government may prescribe abridged form of annual return for One Person Company, small company and such other class or classes of companies as may be prescribed.”

Question 3. Priya, a nominee director on the Board of Aroma Ltd., a listed company, informed the Board of directors during a Board meeting that the next annual report of the company shall contain a ‘Management Discussion and Analysis Report’. You being the Company Secretary have been asked by the Board to prepare the said report. State the matters you would include in the report.

Answer:

A Management Discussion and Analysis Report (MDAR) should form part of the Annual Report to the shareholders. This Management Discussion and Analysis should include discussion on the following matters within the limits set by the company’s competitive position:

  • Industry structure and developments.
  • Opportunities and Threats.
  • Segment-wise or product-wise performance.
  • Outlook.
  • Risks and concerns.
  • Internal control systems and their adequacy.
  • Discussion on financial performance with respect to operational performance.
  • Material developments in Human Resources/Industrial Relations front, including number of people employed.

Question 4. Fabulous Ltd. is in the process of finalisation of its annual return. It is a listed company with paid-up capital 1 crore. The company seeks your advice on the following:

  1. Who will sign the return on behalf of the company?
  2. What are the requirements of certification of annual return by a practising Company Secretary. 

Answer:

  • As per Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013, every company shall prepare its annual return containing the required particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year and shall be signed by a director and the Company Secretary, or where there is no Company Secretary, by a Company Secretary in practice.
  • Whereas in case of One Person Company and small company, the annual return shall be signed by the Company Secretary, or where there is no Company Secretary, by the director of the company.
  • Every listed company, or a company with paid up share capital of 10 crore or more or a company with turnover of 50 crore or more, shall be required to get a certificate by the Practicing Company Secretary (PCS) stating the facts that the requirements of the Companies Act, 2013 and rules thereto have been complied with and Annual Return discloses the facts correctly and adequately.

Question 5. Phosphate Ltd. has suffered a major loss of * 100 crore in May, 2018 on the dealing of commodity exchange. The annual accounts and Board’s report for the year 2017-18 are under finalization.

The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the company does not want to disclose this loss in the Board’s report for year 2017-18 because this loss does not pertain to said financial year. Is the view of CFO correct? The Board of Directors seek your advice in this matter.

Answer:

According to Section 134(3)(k) all material changes and commitments, if any, affecting the financial position of the company which have occurred between the end of the financial year of the company to which the financial statements relate and the date of the report should form part of the Board’s Report.

The Director’s Report shall, therefore, contain material changes pertaining to post-financial statement events impacting the operations and performance of the Company. Thus, in present case view of Chief Financial Officer is incorrect. Loss of 100 Crore incurred during May, 2018, i.e. post financial year, shall be included in the Board’s Report for the year 2017-18. -Space to write important points for revision

Transparency And Disclosures Short Notes

Question 1. Write short note on Certification of Annual Return.

Answer:

Certification of Annual Return:

Certification of Annual Return under sub-section (2) of Section 92 of the Act read with Rule 11(2) of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014, the Annual Return of a listed company or of a company having a paid up share capital of 10 Crores or more or turnover of 50 Crores or more shall be certified by a Company Secretary in Practice in the Form No. MGT-8. The certificate shall state that the annual return discloses the facts correctly and adequately and that the company has complied with all the provisions of this Act.

The Companies (Management and Administration) Amendment Rules, 2021:

The MCA has notified the Companies (Management and Administration) Amendment Rules, 2021 to further amend the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014.

In Section 92 of the Principal Act, for sub-Section (5), the following sub- Section shall be substituted, namely:

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020

If any company fails to file its annual return under Section 92(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, before the expiry of the period specified therein, such company and its every officer who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of ₹10,000 and in case of continuing failure, with further penalty of ₹100 for each day during which such failure continues, subject to a maximum of 2 lakhs in case of a company and 50,000 in case of an officer who is in default.

Question 2. Write short note on website disclosure.

Answer:

Website Disclosure:

  • details of its business;
  • financial information including complete copy of the annual report including balance sheet, profit and loss account, directors report etc;
  • contact information of the designated officials of the listed entity who are responsible for assisting and handling investor grievances;
  • email address for grievance redressal and other relevant details;
  • name of the debenture trustees with full contact details;
  • the information, report, notices, call letters, circulars, proceedings, etc concerning non-convertible redeemable preference shares or non convertible debt securities;
  • all information and reports including compliance reports filed by the listed entity:
  • information with respect to the following events:
    • default by issuer to pay interest on or redemption amount;
    • failure to create a charge on the assets;
    • revision of rating assigned to the non convertible debt securities:

It is important that the listed entity ensures the contents of the website are correct and updated at any given point of time. Space to write important points for revision

Transparency And Disclosures Descriptive Questions

Question 3. What information is required to be disclosed in Annual Report.

Answer:

Annual Report:

The annual report is a comprehensive report provided by most public companies to disclose their corporate activities over the past year. The report is typically issued to shareholders and other stakeholders who use it to evaluate the firm’s performance including both operating and financial highlights.

Such annual report shall contain the following:

  • audited financial statements i.e. balance sheets, profit and loss accounts otc, and Statement on Impact of Audit Qualifications, if applicable;
  • consolidated financial statements audited by its statutory auditors;
  • cash flow statement presented only under the indirect method as prescribed in Accounting Standard-3 or Indian Accounting Standard 7, as applicable, specified in Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013
  • directors report;
  • management discussion and analysis report – either as a part of directors report or addition thereto;
  • for the top five hundred listed entities based on market capitalization Further it is provided that the annual report shall contain any other disclosures specified in Companies Act, 2013 along with other requirements as specified in Schedule V of above mentioned regulations.

As per SEBI (LODR), the annual report shall contain the following additional disclosures:

  • Related Party Disclosure:
  • Management Discussion and Analysis:
  • Corporate Governance Report
    • A brief statement on listed entity’s philosophy on code of governance.
    • Board of directors:
    • Audit committee
    • Nomination and Remuneration Committee:
    • Remuneration of Directors:
    • Stakeholders’ grievance committee:
    • General body meetings:
    • Means of communication:
    • General shareholder information:
  • Declaration signed by the chief executive officer stating that the members of board of directors and senior management personnel have, affirmed compliance with the code of conduct of board of directors and senior management.
  • Compliance certificate from either the auditors or practicing company secretaries regarding compliance of conditions of corporate governance shall be annexed with the directors’ report.
  • Disclosures with respect to demat suspense account/ unclaimed suspense account

Question 4. Describe the contents and signing of Annual Return.

Answer:

Annual Return:

  • As per Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013, every company is required to prepare the Annual Return in Form No. MGT-7 containing the particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year.
  • Annual Return is to be filed with the Registrar within 60 days from the date on which Annual General Meeting (AGM) is actually held or from the last day on which AGM should have been held.
  • As provided in sub-Section (2) of Section 384, the provisions of Section 92 regarding filing of annual return apply to a foreign company subject to such exceptions, modifications and adoptions as may be provided for in the Rules.
  • Rule 7 of the Companies (Registration of Foreign Companies) Rules, 2014 provides that every foreign company shall prepare and file, within a period of sixty days from the last day of its financial year, to the Registrar annual return in Form FC-4 along with fee, containing the particulars as they stood on the close of the financial.year.

Contents of Annual Return

Annual Return shall contain the following particulars in consonance with the Section 92(1) of the Act:

  • its registered office, principal business activities, particulars of its holding, subsidiary and associate companies;
  • its shares, debentures and other securities and shareholding pattern;
  • its members and debenture-holders along with changes therein since the close of the previous financial year;
  • its promoters, directors, key managerial personnel along with changes therein since the close of the previous financial year;
  • meetings of members or a class thereof, Board and its various committees along with attendance details;
  • remuneration of directors and key managerial personnel;
  • penalty or punishment imposed on the company, its directors or officers and details of compounding of offences and appeals made against such penalty or punishment;
  • matters relating to certification of compliances, disclosures as may be prescribed;
  • details, as may be prescribed, in respect of shares held by or on behalf of the Foreign Institutional Investors and such other matters as may be prescribed.

Signing of Annual Return

Under section 92(1) of the Act, the Annual Return is required to be signed both by a director and the Company Secretary, or where there is no Company Secretary, by a Company Secretary in Practice.

The Annual Return of One Person Company and Small Company shall be signed by the Company Secretary or where there is no company secretary, by the director of the company. The Act authorises the Central Government.

CS Company Law Distribution Of Profits Question and Answers

Distribution Of Profits

Section 2(35)

Under section 2(35) of the Companies Act, 2013, ‘dividend’ includes any interim dividend.

Dividend in Companies Act, 2013

The dividend is the share of the company’s profit distributed among the members.

Declare Interim Dividend in Companies Act, 2013

The Board may declare an interim dividend during any financial year out of the surplus in the Profit and Loss Account at any time between two AGMs of the company.

Final Dividend in Companies Act, 2013

Final Dividend means a Dividend which was declared at the Annual General Meeting of the company.

Inadequacy of Profits in Companies Act, 2013

In case of inadequacy of profits, the company can declare the dividend under Rule 3 of Companies (Declaration and Payment of Dividend) Rules 2014.

Amount of Dividend in Companies Act, 2013

The amount of the dividend shall be deposited in a scheduled bank in a separate account within 5 days from the date of declaration.

Unpaid Dividend Account in Companies Act, 2013

Where the dividend is not paid or claimed within 30 days, the company shall, within 7 days transfer the amount to the Unpaid Dividend Account which shall be opened in a scheduled bank.

Investor Education and Protection Fund in Companies Act, 2013

The amount remaining unpaid along with interest accrued thereon for 7 years shall be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

Utilization of Investor Education and Protection Fund in Companies Act, 2013

Section 125 (3) provides the Fund shall be utilized for

  • The refund in respect of unclaimed dividends, matured deposits, matured debentures, the application money due for refund, and interest thereon;
  • Promotion of investors’ education, awareness, and protection;
  • Reimbursement of legal expenses incurred in pursuing class action suits under sections 37 and 245 by members, debenture-holders, or depositors as may be sanctioned by the Tribunal.

Distribution Of Profits

Punishment for Failure to Distribute Dividends in Companies Act, 2013

Section 127 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that when a dividend has been declared by a company but has not been paid or the warrant in respect thereof has not been posted within thirty days from the date of declaration to any shareholder entitled to the payment of the dividend, every director of the company shall, if he is knowingly a party to the default, be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to two years and with fine which shall not be less than one thousand rupees for every day during which such default continues and the company shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of eighteen percent. per annum during the period for which such default continues.

List of Important Forms in Companies Act, 2013

Company Law Distribution Of Profits List Of Important Forms

Distribution Of Profits Short Notes

Question 1. Write a note on the following:

Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF) in Companies Act, 2013

Answer:

Company Law Distribution Of Profits What shall be credited to IEPF

Question 2. Write a note on the following: Punishment for failure to distribute dividends and exceptions in the Companies Act, 2013
Answer:

Company Law Distribution Of Profits Punishment for Failure

Distribution Of Profits Distinguish Between

Question 3. Distinguish between the following:

‘Interim dividend’ and ‘final dividend’ in Companies Act, 2013

Answer:

Company Law Distribution Of Profits Basis Meaning

Distribution Of Profits Descriptive Questions

Question 1. Comment on the following:

Dividends can be paid out of capital only if the articles of association of a company authorize such payment. 

Answer:

Company Law Distribution Of Profits Authenticity of statement

Question 2. The Board of Directors of a company in a meeting held on 30th April 2013 declared an interim dividend. In another meeting held on 18th May 2013, the Board revoked the interim dividend declared without assigning any reason. Advise the company in the matter.

Answer:

Company Law Distribution Of Profits Interim Dividend

Question 3. Due to the inadequacy of profits, the Board of Directors of Rise Ltd. decided not to recommend any dividend for the financial year ending 31st March 2015.

Certain shareholders of the company complained to the NCLT regarding mismanagement of the affairs of the company, since the Board of the company did not recommend any dividend. Explaining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, examine whether the contention of the shareholders is tenable.

Answer:

Company Law Distribution Of Profits Basis of Petition

Question 4. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 advise a public company that declared a dividend on 30th September 2018 as to the procedures to be followed in this regard for payment of dividend. Whether any intervening holidays in October 2018 shall be taken into account in calculating the time limit?

Answer:

  • Section 123(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the amount of the dividend, including interim dividend shall be deposited in a scheduled bank in a separate account within five days from the date of declaration of the dividend.
  • However, in the case of a Government Company sub Section 4 of Section 123 shall not apply in which the entire paid-up share capital is held by the Central Government, or by any State Government or Governments by the Central Government and one or more State Governments or by one or more Government Company.
  • Inferring from Section 124(1) dividend must be paid to any shareholder entitled to the payment of the dividend, within 30 days from the date of declaration of dividend.
  • Secretarial Standard-3(SS-3) hereby clarifies that the Dividend shall be deposited in a separate bank account within five days from the date of declaration and shall be paid within 30 days of declaration. The intervening holidays, if any, falling during ‘such a period shall be included.
  • Therefore in the given illustration, the dividend shall be deposited into a separate bank account of a scheduled bank on or before 05.10.2018 and the same must be paid to the registered shareholder or his order or his banker on or before 30.10.2018.

Question 5. Manish, a shareholder of a company has not claimed his dividends from the company for the last 10 years due to different reasons. He wants to know whether he will be able to recover the dividends declared by the company for all these years. Explain to him, the relevant legal provisions.

Answer:

  • According to Section 124 of the Companies Act, 2013 dividends must be paid within 30 days from the date of declaration and if any amount remains unpaid or unclaimed then the company is required to transfer the unpaid dividend to a special account, known as Unpaid Dividend Account opened by the company in any scheduled bank within seven days from the date of expiry of thirty days.
  • If any money transferred to this account remains unpaid or unclaimed for seven years from the date of transfer to such account it shall be transferred by the company to the Investor Education and Protection Fund established under Section 125 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013 maintained and administered by the Central Government.
  • In the present case, the amount of the dividend for the first 3 years must have been transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund. The amount for the remaining period must be in the Unpaid Dividend Account of the Company.
  • According, to Section 125 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 7 of the IEPF(Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016, the person whose amounts have been transferred to Investor Education and Protection Fund, shall be entitled to get a refund out of the fund in respect of such claims by submitting an online application in Form IEPF-5.
  • Manish should approach the company for the amount of dividends for the last 7 years.

Question 6. Comment on the following:

Dealing with dividends is the prerogative of the Board of Directors. However, there are certain parameters included in the dividend distribution policy of a company. Answer:

Regulation 43A of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 provides for the formulation of policy for dividend distribution which broadly specifies the external and internal factors including parameters that may be considered while declaring dividends and the circumstances under which the shareholders of the company may or may not expect a dividend. The dividend distribution policy shall include the following parameters:

  • the circumstances under which the shareholders of the listed entities may or may not expect dividends;
  • the financial parameters that shall be considered while declaring dividends;
  • internal and external factors that shall be considered for the declaration of dividend;
  • policy as to how the retained earnings shall be utilized; and
  • parameters that shall be adopted about various classes of shares.

Hence, the top 500 listed entities based on market capitalization (calculated as of March 31 of every financial year) are required to formulate a dividend distribution policy which shall be disclosed in their annual reports and as well as on their websites.

The listed entities other than the top five hundred listed entities based on market capitalization may also disclose their dividend distribution policies voluntarily in their annual reports and on their website.

Distribution Of Profits Practical Questions

Question 1. A company for the financial year 2011-12 declared a dividend on 19th September 2012 but failed to distribute the same within the prescribed period. A case was filed against a director in this regard. The director has contended that he had resigned before the declaration of the dividend. Decide the fate of the director in light of the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

Company Law Distribution Of Profits Punishment for Failure to distribute dividends

Question 2. In Evergreen Ltd., the Board of Directors declared an interim dividend but could not distribute the dividend due to objections of the audit committee that the accounts considered by the Board were false; and true financial results were inflated by not incorporating outstanding liabilities and over-valuation of inventories.

A shareholder filed a suit for non-payment of dividends. One of the directors contended that he never attended the Board meeting where the issue relating to the payment of the interim dividend was declared based on false accounts. Discuss the validity of the contention of the director.

Answer:

The contention of the absentee director is correct and he is not liable for the payment of dividends on false accounts declared in a meeting where the director to become liable was absent. The facts of the case are similar to the case law of Nagendra Prabhu v. the Popular Bank ZLR (1961) 1 Ker 340.

Question 3. Rise Ltd., a company with diversified interests, has constituted an Investor Education and Protection Fund as required under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. The company has so far not deposited any amount to the fund. The President (Finance) has asked you, the Company Secretary, to submit a note on amounts payable to the credit of the fund and the period within which the amount shall be paid. Prepare the said note.

Answer:

  Rise Limited

The President (Finance)                                                             Date ________

Sir,

Sub: Details on the amount payable to the Investor Education and Protection Fund constituted under the Companies Act, 2013.

According to Section 125(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government shall establish a Fund to be called the Investor Education and Protection Fund. Therefore, the company is not required to constitute such a fund.

According to Section 125(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 the following amounts shall be credited to the Fund established by the Government by the company:

  • the amount is given by the Central Government by way of grants after due appropriation made by Parliament by law on this behalf for being utilized for the Fund;
  • donations given to the Fund by the Central Government, State Governments, Companies, or any other institution for the Fund;
  • the amount in the Unpaid Dividend Account of companies transferred to the Fund under sub-section (5) of Section 124;
  • the amount lying in the Investor Education and Protection Fund.
  • the interest or other income received out of investments made from the Fund;
  • the amount received under sub-section (4) of Section 38;
  • the application money received by companies for allotment of any securities and due for refund;
  • matured deposits with companies other than banking companies;
  • matured debentures with companies;
  • interest accrued on the amounts referred to in clauses (h) to (i);
  • sale proceeds of fractional shares arising out of issuance of bonus shares, merger, and amalgamation for seven or more years;
  • redemption amount of preference shares remaining unpaid or unclaimed for seven or more years; and
  • such other amount as may be prescribed:
    Provided that no such amount referred to in clauses (h) to (j) shall form part of the Fund unless such amount has remained unclaimed and unpaid for seven years from the date it became due for payment.

This is for your information and record, please.

Best Regards

Company Secretary

Question 4. The Board of Directors of AVB Limited wants to declare a dividend. 15 lakhs out of capital profits for the year ended 31st March 2017, without making provisions for depreciation. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, you being the Secretary of the Company advise the board whether it can go ahead with its proposal.

Answer:

  • By the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, as contained in the third proviso to Section 123(1), no dividend shall be declared or paid by a company from its reserves other than free reserves. As per Section 2(43) of the Companies Act, 2013, “free reserves” means such reserves which, as per the latest audited balance sheet of a company, are available for distribution as dividends.
  • Further according to Section 123(2), for declaration of dividend by a company as per Section 123(1) (a), depreciation shall be provided by the provisions of Schedule II.
  • Therefore, in the given case, AVB Limited can neither declare dividends from capital profit nor it can declare dividends without making provision for depreciation.

Question 5. The Board of Directors of American Express Ltd. declared an interim dividend third time during the financial year 2015-16. After the declaration, the Board of Directors decided to revoke the third interim dividend as they noticed that the company’s financial position did not permit payment of such an interim dividend. The Board of Directors seeks your advice in this matter. Please advise the Board as a company secretary. Would your advice be different in case it was a regular dividend instead of an interim dividend?

Answer:

  • The Board of Directors may declare an interim dividend and the amount of the dividend including the interim dividend shall be deposited in a separate bank account within 5 days from the date of declaration of such dividend.
  • A dividend when declared becomes debt and a shareholder is entitled to sue for recovery of the same after the expiry of the 30 days prescribed under Section 127.
  • Section 2(35) defines ‘Dividend’ to include interim dividend. Therefore, the interim dividend once declared cannot be revoked except with the consent of the shareholders.
  • Based on the aforesaid facts, the Board of Directors of American Express Limited cannot revoke the interim dividend and should pay the same.
  • No, Regular dividends also cannot be revoked even by the shareholders. It’s a statutory debt against the company once it is declared.

Question 6. The Board of Directors of Peculiar Ltd. proposes to recommend a final dividend of 25 each to all the equity shareholders of the company. The company seeks your opinion on the following:

  1. The company wants to deposit the dividend amount to a cooperative bank.
  2. The company is a defaulter in the repayment of deposits and proposes to repay all deposits after the payment of the dividend within 10 days.
  3. Dividends will be declared out of the capital reserves of the company.
  4. The company wants to pay such dividends through the cash counter by way of a cash voucher.

Answer:

Peculiar Ltd. has to follow the below procedure for recommending the final dividend:

  • Referring to Section 123(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, the amount of the dividend has to be deposited in a scheduled bank. The company should first ensure that said Co-operative bank is a scheduled bank from the list of scheduled banks available on the RBI website, and then it may deposit the dividend amount in the scheduled Co-operative Bank.
  • Referring to Section 123(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 a company that fails to comply with the provisions relating to acceptance and repayment of deposits shall not, so long as such failure continues, declare any dividend on its equity shares. Hence Peculiar Ltd. cannot declare dividends till the failure persists.
  • Referring to the third proviso to Section 123(1), no dividend shall be declared or paid by a company from its reserves other than free reserves.
    Free reserves, as per Section 2(43), means such reserves which, as per the latest audited balance sheet of a company, are available for distribution as dividends: Provided that:

    • Any amount representing unrealized gains, notional gains, or revaluation of assets, whether shown as a reserve or otherwise, or
    • Any change in the carrying amount of an asset or of a liability recognized in equity, including surplus in profit and loss account on measurement of the asset or the liability at fair value, shall not be treated as free reserves;
    • Hence dividends cannot be declared out of the capital reserves of the company.
  • Referring to Section 123(5) dividends shall not be payable in cash. Hence company’s proposal to pay dividends through the cash counter by way of a cash voucher is not permitted under law.

Question 7. A company declared a dividend on 21st November 2018. It reported on 22nd December 2018 that it could not pay dividends to 46 members as they have not been traceable for the last three years. Advise the company about unpaid dividends under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

Company Law Distribution Of Profits Provisions of Section 126

Question 8. While adopting accounts for the year, the Board of Directors of Prima Ltd. decided to consider the interim dividend @ 12% as the final dividend and did not consider the transfer of profit to reserves. Explain whether the decisions of the Board were justified by referring to relevant provisions.

Answer:

  • Section 123 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that for the provisions relating to the declaration of dividends.
  • Since an interim dividend is also a dividend, companies should provide for depreciation under Section 123 of the Companies Act, 2013. before the declaration of the interim dividend.
  • However, the first proviso to Section 123(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that a company may, before the declaration of any dividend in any financial year, transfer such percentage of its profits for that financial year as it considers appropriate to the reserves of the company irrespective of the size of declared dividend i.e. company is not compulsory required to transfer the profit to reserves, and it is only an option made available to the company to transfer such percentage of profit to reserves.
  • In the above case, the Board has decided to pay an interim dividend of @12% of the paid-up capital. Assuming the company has complied with the depreciation requirement and other applicable provisions, the interim or final dividend can be declared without transferring such percentage of its profits as it may consider appropriate to the reserve of the company.
  • Hence, it may be end that Prima Ltd. is under no contravention of law by not transferring i.e. the company is free to transfer any amount of its profit to the reserves, without any compulsion or restriction before the declaration of any dividend.
  • Section 123(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 states that the Board of Directors of a company may declare an interim dividend during any financial year or at any time during the period from the closure of the financial year till the holding of the annual general meeting out of the surplus in the profit and loss account or out of profits of the financial year for which such interim dividend is sought to be declared or out of profits generated in the financial year till the quarter preceding the date of declaration of the interim dividend.
  • The amount of dividend including interim dividend should be deposited in a separate bank account within five days from the declaration of such dividend for compliance with Section 123(4) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Question 9. The following summarized information is available in respect of a company for the year ended 31st March 2019:

Company Law Distribution Of Profits Lakhs

The company has paid dividends to the equity shareholders @ 8%, 10%, and 12% during the immediately preceding three financial years. Advise the Board of Directors on the maximum amount they can pay this year by way of dividends.

Answer:

As per Section 123 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013, a company can distribute dividends out of profits of the current year or from profits of previous financial years.

In the event of inadequacy or absence of profits in any financial year, if the company wants to propose a declaration of dividend, it can pay it out of accumulated profits earned by it in previous years and transferred by the company to the free reserves, according to the conditions prescribed under Rule 3 of the Companies (Declaration and Payment of Dividend) Rules, 2014.

In the above case, the net loss for the year 2018-19 is 25000. According to Rule 3 of the Companies (Declaration and Payment of Dividend) Rules, 2014 the following conditions must be fulfilled:

  • The rate of dividend cannot exceed the average of the rates at which the dividend was declared in the three years immediately preceding that year i.e. (8%+10% +12%) / 3 = 10%, so in this case, the amount of dividend should not exceed 1 Lakh.
  • The total amount to be drawn from such accumulated profits shall not exceed one-tenth of the sum of its paid-up share capital and free reserves as appearing in the latest audited financial statement. Thus the company can draw only upto 1.2 lakh.
  • The balance of reserves after such withdrawal shall not fall below 15% of its paid-up capital as appearing in the latest audited balance sheet. Accordingly, the maximum that may be withdrawn cannot exceed 50000.
  • However, the amount so withdrawn must be used to set off losses of the current year i.e. ₹ 25000.

Hence, the maximum amount in this instant case that can be paid by way of dividend is ₹ 25000.

Question 10. Examine the validity of the following:

  1. XYZ Ltd. wants to declare the dividend out of the current year’s profit without adjusting the previous year’s carry-forward losses and depreciation.
  2. The Board of Directors of XYZ Ltd. wants to declare an interim dividend after the end of the financial year.

Answer:

Declaration of Dividend:

  • Section 123(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 states that the dividend shall be declared or paid by a company for any financial year out of the profits of the company for that year arrived at after providing for depreciation or out of the profits of the company for any previous financial year or years arrived at after providing for depreciation and remaining undistributed, or out of both.
    Proviso to this section provides that a company shall not declare dividends unless carried over previous losses and depreciation not provided in the previous year or years are set off against profits of the company for the current year.
    Hence, XYZ Ltd has to set off the previous year’s carry-forward loss and depreciation from the current year’s profit before the declaration of the dividend.
  • As per section 123(3), the board of directors of a company may declare an interim dividend during any financial year or at any time during the period from the closure of the financial year till the holding of the annual general meeting out of surplus in the profit and loss account or out of profits of the financial year for which such interim dividend is sought to be declared or out of profits generated in the financial year till quarter preceding the date of declaration of the interim dividend.

Short Notes

Question 1. Write a short note on Punishment for failure to distribute dividends.

Answer:

Section 127 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that when a dividend has been declared by a company but has not been paid or the warrant in respect thereof has not been posted within thirty days from the date of declaration to any shareholder entitled to the payment of the dividend, every director of the company shall, if he is knowingly a party to the default, be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to two years and with fine which shall not be less than one thousand rupees for every day during which such default continues and the company shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of eighteen percent. per annum during the period for which such default continues.

Distribution Of Profits Descriptive Questions

Question 2. State the procedure for the transfer of unpaid or unclaimed dividends to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

Answer:

Any money transferred to the Unpaid Dividend Account of a company in pursuance of Section 124 which remains unpaid or unclaimed for seven years from the date of such transfer shall be transferred by the company along with interest accrued if any, thereon to the Investor Education and Protection Fund and the company shall send a statement in the prescribed form of the details of such transfer to the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority and it shall issue a receipt to the company as evidence of such transfer.

  • Every company shall within ninety days after holding the Annual General Meeting or the date on which it should have been held as per the provisions of section 96 of the Act and every year thereafter till completion of the seven years, identify the unclaimed dividend, as on the date of holding of Annual General Meeting or the date on which it should have been held as per the provisions of section 96 of the Act, separately furnish and upload on its website and also on website of Authority or any other website as may be specified by the Government, a statement or information through Form No. IEPF-2, separately for each year, contains the following information, namely:
    • the names and last known addresses of the persons entitled to receive the sum;
    • the nature of the amount;
    • the amount to which each person is entitled;
    • the due date for transfer into the Invest or Education and Protection Fund; and
    • such other information as may be considered relevant for the purposes.
  • The amount of unclaimed or unpaid dividend required to be credited by the companies to the Fund shall be remitted into the specified branches of Punjab National Bank, which is the accredited Bank of the Pay and Accounts Office, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, and other authorized banks engaged by the MCA-21 system, within thirty days of such amounts becoming due to be credited to the Fund.
  • The amount shall be tendered by the companies along with challan (in triplicate) to the specified Bank Branches of Punjab National Bank and other authorized banks under the MCA-21 system who will return two copies of the challan, duly stamped in token of having received the amount, to the Company. The third copy of the challan will be forwarded along with the daily credit scroll by the receiving branch to its Focal Point Branch of the Bank for onward transmission to the Pay and Accounts Office, Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
  • Every company shall file with the concerned Authority one copy of the challan referred to in point (3) indicating the deposit of the amount to the Fund and shall fill in the full particulars of the amount tendered, including the head of the account to which it has been credited.
  • The company shall, along with the copy of the challan as required under point(4), furnish a Statement in Form No. IEPF 1 contains details of such transfer to the Authority within thirty days of submission of challan.
  • The amount may also be remitted by Electronic Fund Transfer in such manner, as may be specified by the Central Government.
  • On receipt of the statement, the Authority shall enter the details of such receipt in a Register maintained physically or electronically by it in respect of each company every year, and reconcile the amount so remitted and collected, with the concerned designated bank every month.
  • Each designated bank shall furnish an abstract of such receipts during the month to the Authority within seven days after the close of every month.
  • The company shall maintain a record consisting of the name, last known address, amount, folio number or client ID, certificate number, beneficiary details, etc. of the persons in respect of whom unpaid or unclaimed amount has remained unpaid or unclaimed for seven years and has been transferred to the Fund and the Authority shall have the powers to inspect such records. Space to write important points for revision

Question 3. Enumerate the procedure for declaration of dividend out of Reserve.

Answer:

  • Give notice to all the directors of the company for holding a Board meeting. In the meeting, decide to declare dividends out of the company’s reserves because of inadequacy or absence of profits and also fix the date, time, and place of the Annual General Meeting. Authorize the Company Secretary or any competent person if the company does not have a company secretary to issue the notice of the AGM on behalf of the Board of Directors of the company to all the members, directors, and auditors of the company and other persons entitled to receive the same.
  • Ensure that the Companies (Declaration and Payment of Dividend), Rules, 2014 are complied with.
  • While calculating the profits of the previous years, take only the net profit after tax.
  • Ensure that while computing the amount of profits, the amount transferred from the Development Rebate Reserve is included and all items of capital reserves including reserves created by revaluation of assets are excluded.
  • In the case of listed companies, inform the Stock Exchange with which the shares of the company are listed within 30 minutes of the closure of the Board meeting about the decision to recommend the declaration of dividend out of the Company’s Reserves. [Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015].
  • Issue notices in writing at least 21 days before the date of the Annual General Meeting hold the meeting and pass the necessary resolution.
  • In the case of listed companies, forward copies of the notice and a copy of the proceeding of the general meeting to the Stock Exchange.
  • Open a separate bank account for making dividend payments and credit. the said bank account with the total amount of dividend payable within five days of declaration of dividend.
  • Issue dividend warrants within 30 days from the date of declaration of dividend. The rest of the procedural steps are the same as in the case of payment of the final dividend.

CS Company Law – Inter Corporate Loans Investments Guarantees Question and Answers

An Overview Of Inter Corporate Loans, Investments, Guarantees And Security, Related Party Transactions

Investments

Investments have been used in a limited sense in the lesson to mean the investing of money in shares, stock, debentures, or other securities.

Loans and Investments by Companies (Section 186)

A company shall unless otherwise prescribed, invest in not more than two layers of investment companies. [Sub-section (1) of section 186]

However, the aforesaid provisions shall not affect-

  • A company from acquiring any other company incorporated in a country outside India if such other company has investment subsidiaries beyond two layers as per the laws of such country;
  • a subsidiary company from having any investment subsidiary for meeting the requirements under any law or under any rule or regulation framed under any law for the time being in force. [Proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 186]

Limits for Loans, Guarantees, Security and Investment – Section 186(2)

No Company shall, directly or indirectly:

  • Give any loan to any person or other body corporate;
  • Give any guarantee, or provide security, in connection with a loan to any other body corporate or person; and
  • Acquire, by way of subscription, purchase, or otherwise the securities of any other body corporate;

exceeding 60% of its paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account or 100% of its free reserves and securities premium account, whichever is more unless the same is previously authorized by a special resolution passed in a general meeting.

Non-Applicability of Section 186

Sub-section (11) of Section 186 provides that nothing contained in this section, except sub-section (1), shall apply-

  • To any loan made, any guarantee given any security provided, or any investment made by a banking company, an insurance company, a housing finance company in the ordinary course of its business, or a company established with the object of and engaged in the business of financing industrial enterprises, or of providing infrastructural facilities;
  • To any investment-
    • made by an investment company;
    • made in shares allotted in pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 62 or in shares allotted in pursuance of rights issues made by a body corporate;
    • made, in respect of investment or lending activities, by a non-banking financial company registered under Chapter 3-B of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and whose principal business is the acquisition of securities.

Penalty for Contravention of Section 186

If a company contravenes the provisions of this section, the company shall be punishable with a fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years and with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees.

Investments to be held in the company’s own home

As per the Act, all investments made or held by a company in any property, security, or other asset shall be made and held by it in its name. This requirement is confined to only those investments which are made by it on its behalf and not on behalf of someone else. However, in certain circumstances, the Act exempts the companies from complying with the above provisions.

Investment not held in the company’s own home

When any shares or securities in which a company has made investments are not held by it in its name as a beneficial owner when such investments are held in the name of a depository according to permissible conditions given in the Act, the company shall forthwith enter in a register maintained by it for the purpose, particulars as specified in the Act.

Related Party Transactions

According to Section 2(76) of the Companies Act, 2013, “related party”, concerning a company, means-

  • A director or his relative;
  • A key managerial personnel or his relative;
  • A firm, in which a director, manager or his relative is a partner;
  • A private company in which a director or manager or his relative is a member or director;
  • A public company in which a director or manager is a director and holds along with his relatives, more than two percent (2%) of its paid-up share capital;
  • Anybody corporate whose Board of Directors, managing director, or manager is accustomed to act by the advice, directions, or instructions of a director or manager;
  • Any person on whose advice, directions, or instructions a director or manager is accustomed to act:
  • Provided that nothing in sub-clauses (6) and (7) shall apply to the advice, directions, or instructions given in a professional capacity;
  • Anybody corporate which is-
    • a holding, subsidiary, or an associate company of such company;
    • a subsidiary of a holding company to which it is also a subsidiary; or
    • an investing company or the venturer of the company.

Nature of Related Party Transactions

The scope of dealing with Related Party Transactions has been widened in the Companies Act, 2013. Section 188 (1) of the Act provides that except with the consent of the Board of Directors given by a resolution at a meeting of the Board and subject to such conditions as prescribed under Rule 15 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, no company shall enter into any contract or arrangement with a related party with respect to-

  • Sale, purchase, or supply of any goods or materials;
  • Selling or otherwise disposing of, or buying, property of any kind;
  • Leasing of property of any kind;
  • Availing or rendering of any services;
  • Appointment of any agent for the purchase or sale of goods, materials, services, or property;
  • Such related party’s appointment to any office or place of profit in the company, its subsidiary company, or associate company; and
  • Underwriting the subscription of any securities or derivatives thereof, of the company:

List of Important Forms

Company Law An Overview Of Inter Corporate Loans Investments List of Important forms

Distinguish Between

Question 1. Distinguish between the following:

  1. ‘Free Reserves’ and ‘Net Worth’ under the provisions of the Companies Act,
  2. ‘Related Party’ and ‘Relative’ as defined and applied under the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

Free Reserves

As per Section 2(43) “free reserves” means such reserves which, as per the latest audited balance Sheet of a company, are available for distribution as dividends:

Provided that:

  • any amount representing unrealized gains, notional gains or revaluation of assets, whether shown as a reserve or otherwise, or
  • any change in the carrying amount of an asset or of a liability recognized in equity, including surplus in profit and loss account on measurement of the asset or the liability at fair value, shall not be treated as free reserves.

Whereas “Net Worth” means the aggregate value of the paid-up share capital and all reserves created out of the profits and securities premium account, after deducting the aggregate value of the accumulated losses, deferred expenditure and miscellaneous expenditure not written off, as per the audited balance sheet, but does not include reserves created out of revaluation of assets, write-back of depreciation and amalgamation.

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 account and debit or credit balance of profit and loss account, after deducting the aggregate value of the accumulated losses, deferred expenditure and miscellaneous expenditure not written off, as per the audited balance sheet, but does not include reserves created out of revaluation of assets, write-back of depreciation and amalgamation.

According to Section 2(76) of the Companies Act, 2013, “related party”, about a company, means:

  • A director or his relative;
  • A key managerial personnel or his relative;
  • A firm, in which a director, manager or his relative is a partner;
  • A private company in which a director or manager or his relative is a member or director;
  • A public company in which a director or manager is a director and holds along with his relatives, more than two percent (2%) of its paid-up share capital;
  • Anybody corporate whose Board of Directors, managing director, or manager is accustomed to act per the advice, directions, or instructions of a director or manager;
  • Any person on whose advice, directions, or instructions a director or manager is accustomed to act:
  • Provided that nothing in sub-clauses (vi) and (vii) shall apply to the advice, directions, or instructions given in a professional capacity;
  • Any company which is-
    • A holding, subsidiary, or an associate company of such company; or
    • A subsidiary of a holding company to which it is also a subsidiary;
    • According to Notification No. GSR 464(E), dated 05/06/2015 in the case of Private Companies this subclause shall not apply concerning Section 188.
  • Such other person as may be prescribed;

Rule 3 of the Companies (Specification of Definitions Details) Rules, 2014 prescribes, that a director other than an independent director or key managerial personnel of the holding company or his relative about a company, shall be deemed to be a related party.

According to Section 2(77), ‘relative’ concerning any person means anyone who is related to another, if: (i) they are members of a HUF; (ii) they are husband and wife; or (iii) one person is related to the other in such manner as may be prescribed.

According to Rule 4 of the Companies (Specification of Definitions Details) Rules, 2014, a person shall be deemed to be the relative of another, if he or she is related to another in the following manner, namely:

  • Father: Provided that the term “Father” includes step-father.
  • Mother: Provided that the term “Mother” includes the stepmother.
  • Son: Provided that the term “Son” includes the stepson.
  • Son’s wife.
  • Daughter.
  • Daughter’s husband.
  • Brother: Provided that the term “Brother” includes the step-brother;
  • Sister: Provided that the term “Sister” includes the step-sister. -Space to write important points for revision

Descriptive Questions

Question 1. Your company, which is a public limited company wishes to make investments in shares of a company. The total investment exceeds the statutory limit stipulated by the Companies Act, 2013. What are the formalities to be complied with in this regard?

Answer:

Company Law An Overview Of Inter Corporate Loans Investments Provisions of Sec. 186

Question 2. What transactions are considered as ‘related party transactions’ under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013? Explain.

Answer:

Provisions of the Companies Act Regarding Related Party Transaction

Meaning of related party. Sec. 2(76) of Companies Act, 2013

Concerning company, the term ‘related party’ means and includes the following:

  • a director or his relative,
  • KMP or their relative,
  • a firm in which a director, manager, or his relative is a partner,
  • a private company in which a director or manager is a director or member,
  • a public company in which a director or Manager is a director or holds along with his relatives more than 2% of its paid-up share capital.
  • a person on whose advice, directions, or instruction (except given in a professional capacity) a director or manager is accustomed to act,
  • a holding/ subsidiary or associate company, subsidiary’s subsidiary, and such person as would be prescribed.

Related Party Transaction Sec. 188

The escape of dealing with related party transactions has been given in the Companies Act, 2013, stating that the contracts or arrangements with above mentioned related party which comes to the following shall be covered under the scope of the provision:

  • Sale, purchase, or supply of any goods or materials;
  • Selling or otherwise disposing of, or buying, property of any kind;
  • Leasing of property of any kind;
  • Availing or rending of any services;
  • Appointment of any agent for the purchase or sale of goods, materials, services, or property;
  • Such, related party’s appointment to any office or place of profit in the company, its subsidiary company or associate company; and Underwriting the subscription of any securities or derivatives thereof, of the company.

Ordinary Resolution

  • Provided that no contract or arrangement, in the case of a company having a paid-up share capital of not less than such amount, or transactions not exceeding such sums, as may be prescribed, shall be entered into except with the prior approval of the company by an ordinary resolution.
  • Provided further that no member of the company shall vote on such ordinary resolution, to approve any contract or arrangement that may be entered into by the company, if such member is a related party. (This proviso is not applicable on private companies)

When Prior Approval of

Company by Ordinary Resolution Required for Related Party Transactions [Rule 15 of Companies (Meeting of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014]

  • Transaction
    • Sale, purchase, or supply of any goods or materials, directly or through the appointment of an agent.
    • Selling or otherwise disposing of or buying property of any kind, directly or through the appointment of an agent.
    • Leasing of property of any kind
    • Availing or rendering of any services, directly or through the appointment of an agent
    • Is for appointment to any office or place of profit in the company, its subsidiary company, or associate company
    • Is for remuneration for underwriting the subscription of any 6. securities or derivatives thereof, of the company
  • When Ordinary Resolution is Required
    • Exceeding ten percent of the turnover of the company or rupees one hundred crore, whichever is lower.
    • Exceeding ten percent of the net worth of the company or rupees one hundred crore, whichever is lower.
    • Exceeding ten percent of the net worth of the company or ten percent. of turnover of the company or rupees one hundred crore, whichever is lower
    • Exceeding ten percent. of the turnover of the company or rupees fifty crore, whichever is lower
    • At a monthly remuneration exceeding two and a half lakh rupees
    • Exceeding one percent of the net worth.

Question 3. Who is a “related party” as defined in Section 2(76)?
Answer: According to Section 2(76) of the Companies Act 2013, “related party”, about a company, means-

  • A director or his relative:
  • A key managerial personnel or his relative;
  • A firm, in which a director, manager or his relative is a partner;
  • A private company in which a director or manager or his relative is a member or director;
  • A public company in which a director or manager is a director and holds along with his relatives, more than two percent (2%) of its paid-up share capital;
  • Any body corporate whose Board of Directors, managing director, or manager is accustomed to act by the advice, directions, or instructions of a director or manager;
  • Any person on whose advice, directions, or instructions a director or manager is accustomed to act: Provided that nothing in sub-clauses (6) and (7) shall apply to the advice, directions, or instructions given in a professional capacity:
  • Any body corporate which is
    • A holding, subsidiary, or an associate company of such company;
    • A subsidiary of a holding company to which it is also a subsidiary; or
    • An investing company or the venturer of the company.

Explanation: For this clause, “the investing company or the venturer of a company” means a body corporate whose investment in the company would result in the company becoming an associate company of the body corporate Such other person as may be prescribed.

Question 4. A company passed a special resolution in its general meeting for the grant of a loan to another body corporate more than the limits specified in section 186(2). However, one of the directors contended that prior approval of their financial institution is also required for such lending. Explain whether the contention of the director is acceptable.

Answer:

Section 186(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that no investment shall be made loan guarantee, or security given by the company unless the resolution sanctioning it is passed at a meeting of the Board with the consent of all the directors present at the meeting and the prior approval of the public financial institution (PFI) concerned where any term loan is subsisting, is procured.

Although the prior consent of a Public Financial Institution shall not be needed where the aggregate of loans and investments so far made, the amounts for which guarantee or security so far provided to or in all other bodies corporate, along with the investments, loans, guarantee or security proposed to be made or given does not exceed the limit of 60% of its paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account or 100% of its free reserves and securities premium account, whichever is higher and there is no default in repayment of loan installments or payment of interest thereon as per the terms and conditions of such loan to the public financial institution.

In the above case, the Company is passing the special resolution under Section 186(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, indicating thereby that the proposed loan together with the loans already given is already more than the limits given under Section 186 (2) of Companies Act, 2013. Therefore the contention of the director is correct as the company aggregate of loans and investments so far made, exceed the limit under Section 186(2) of the Companies Act, 2013.

However, if the aggregate loans/ investments are well within the limits of consent and the company is passing the Special Resolution either in terms of its Article of Association (AOA) or voluntarily only due to some other commercial requirement other than Section 186(2) of Companies Act, 2013, then the prior consent from Financial Institution will not be required.

CS Company Law – Inter Corporate Loans Investments Guarantees Question and Answers

Practical Questions

Question 1. The board of directors of Joy Ltd., by a resolution passed at its meeting, decided to provide a loan of 50 crores to Happy Ltd. The paid-up share capital of Joy Ltd. on the date of resolution was 100 crore and the aggregate balance in the free reserves and securities premium account stood at 40 crore. Examining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, decide whether the Board’s resolution to provide a loan of 50 crores to Happy Ltd. is valid.

Answer:

Company Law An Overview Of Inter Corporate Loans Investments Provisions of Sec.186(2)

Question 2. Virat, a person of 21 years of age is pursuing MBA (Finance) course at a reputed recognised business school. He is not a shareholder of Grow (Pvt.) Ltd. He wishes to inspect the register of investments in securities not held in company’s name and annual return of Grow (Pvt.) Ltd. He also wants to take copies thereof. Examining the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, advise Virat whether he would be successful in this regard.

Answer:

Company Law An Overview Of Inter Corporate Loans Investments Section 187

Question 3. Barkha Ltd. has four directors on its Board. A Board meeting was convened which was attended by only two directors, where Rekha was appointed as an additional director. Rekha is related to both the directors. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, examine the validity of the appointment. 

Answer:

Company Law An Overview Of Inter Corporate Loans Investments Section 188 of Companies

Question 4. RR Limited has decided to make investments in other companies for ₹ 50 lakhs, which is over 60% of the company’s paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account. The company has 5 directors. Four directors were present in the Board meeting, three directors have given their consent but one director abstained from voting. The decision of the Board was noted in the minutes of Board meeting and decided to make such an investment by passing of Board resolution with the majority. Referring to the provisions of Companies Act, 2013, examine the validity of the Board’s decision.

Answer:

By the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, as contained in Section 186 (5), no investment shall be made or loan or guarantee or security given by the company unless the resolution sanctioning it is passed at a meeting of the Board with the consent of all the directors present at the meeting and the prior approval of the public financial institution concerned where any term loan is subsisting, is obtained.

Further, under the provisions of Section 186(2) and 186(3), the loan amount must not exceed 60% of its paid-up capital, free reserves, and securities premium account or 100% of free reserves and securities premium account, whichever is more. In case, the company wishes to exceed the said limit, prior approval, of the company through special resolution would be acquired.

In the given case, in the absence of adequate information, even if we assume that 50 lakh does not exceed 100% of free reserves and securities premium account, RR Limited has not complied with the provisions of Section 186 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013 where consent of all-the directors present is required. The resolution of the Board of Directors, therefore, is not valid and has no legal effect.

Question 5. XYZ Ltd., a company, has a paid-up share capital of * 60 crores and free reserves of 25 crores. It desires to make a loan of 20 crores to M Ltd. The company XYZ Ltd. has already made investments in many other companies including loans to the extent of 35 crores. Can the company go ahead with a loan to M Ltd.? Please advise the company about the procedure to be followed by it.

Answer:

As per Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 a company shall make investments up to 60 percent of paid-up share capital and free reserves or 100 percent of free reserves and securities premium account whichever is more.

In this case, the company can make a maximum investment of 60% (60+25) = 51 crores.

Since the company has already invested 35 crores it can further invest 16 crores only.

To invest upto 20 crores they need to take approval of shareholders through a special resolution.

Question 6. HIJ Engineers Ltd. has a paid-up capital of * 20 lahks, Free Reserves of 3 lakh, and a Securities Premium of 2 lakh. It has granted a loan of 14 lakh to KLM Traders Ltd. The Board of Directors is proposing the following transactions without securing approval of the members:

  1. Sanctioning a loan of 2 lakh to KLM Cement Ltd. and
  2. Sanctioning a loan of ₹ 3 lakh to an employee of the company.

Can the Board of Directors sanction the aforesaid loans?

Answer:

According to Section 186 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that, no company shall directly or indirectly give any loan to any person or other body corporate exceeding 60% of its paid-up share capital, free reserves and securities premium account or 100% of its free reserves and securities premium account, whichever is higher.

As per Section 186(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 states that where the aggregate of the loans and investment so far made, along with the investment or loan, proposed to be made or given by the Board, exceed the limits specified under section 186(2), no investment or loan shall be made unless previously authorised by a special resolution passed in a general meeting.

Therefore, as per section 186(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, the limits for the loan and investment will be the amount whichever is higher of the following:

  1. 60% of paid up share capital, free reserves and securities premium account 15 lakh or
  2. 100% of free reserves and securities premium account = 5 lakh In the above case, since the company has already given loans of 14 lakh to KLM Traders Ltd and further proposed to grant loan, of 2 Lakh to KLM Cement Ltd, it will exceed the limit of 15 lakh, therefore prior approval by special resolution in the general meeting will be required to be passed by HIJ. Engineers Ltd. in terms of Section 186(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.

As per Explanation w.r.t. to Section 186(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, the word person, used under this sub-section does not include any individual who is in the employment of the company.

Accordingly, there are no limit imposed on the right of a company to sanction a loan to an employee of the company under Section 186(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, the Board of directors can grant a loan of 3 lakhs to the employee. No need to require any approval from the members.. Space to write important points for revision

Question 7. Jupiter Ltd. Intends to acquire shares in another company. How much amount can be invested by Jupiter Ltd. without passing special resolution considering the facts mentioned below?

 

Company Law An Overview Of Inter Corporate Loans Investments Jupiter Limited

Answer:

As per section 186(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, no company shall, directly or indirectly:

  • give any loan to any person or other body corporate;
  • give any guarantee or provide security in connection with a loan to any other body corporate or person; and
  • acquire by way of subscription, purchase or otherwise, the securities of any other body corporate, exceeding 60% of its paid-up share capital, free reserves and securities premium account or 100% of its free reserves and securities premium account, whichever is higher.

Further, where the aggregate of the loans and investment so far made, the amount for which guarantee or security so far provided to or in all other bodies corporate along with the investment, loan, guarantee or security proposed to be made or given by the Board, exceed the limits specified under Section 186(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, no investment or loan shall be made or guarantee shall be given or security shall be provided unless previously authorised by a special resolution passed in a general meeting.

Company Law An Overview Of Inter Corporate Loans Investments Particulars

Hence, a further investment that can be made by Jupiter Ltd. without passing a special resolution will be higher of (iv) or (v) or E reduced by investment already made i.e. (864-78084 Crore)

Question 8. XYZ Ltd. is an investment company whose principal business is the acquisition of shares and debentures of other companies. The following figures were derived from the books of XYZ Ltd.:

Assets:

Investment in shares and debenture      ₹ 95 Lakh

Other Assets                                           ₹ 105 Lakh

Total                                                        ₹ 200 Lakh

Income:

Income from investment business        ₹ 12 Lakh

Other Income                                        ₹ 18 Lakh

Total                                                      ₹ 30 Lakh

Whether the company is an investment company as per section 186 and eligible to claim exemption given thereunder?

Answer:

As per explanation to Section 186 (13) of the Companies Act, 2013; the expression “investment company” means a company whose principal business is the acquisition of shares, debentures or other securities and a company will be deemed to be principally engaged in the business of acquisition of shares, debentures or other securities, if its assets in the form of investment in shares, debentures or other securities constitute not less than fifty percent. of its total assets, or if its income derived from investment business constitutes not less than fifty per cent. as a proportion of its gross income.

Conclusion: Since no condition is satisfied, XYZ Limited cannot be categorized as an Investment Company and hence cannot claim exemption given thereunder.

Question 9. The Board of Directors of XYZ Ltd is considering the proposal for making the investment in ABC Ltd. The company has 5 directors on board and in the board meeting 4 directors were present, three of them given consent to the proposal and one director abstained from voting. Comment on the same. 

Answer:

Under section 186(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, no investment shall be made or loan or guarantee or security given by the company, unless the resolution sanctioning it is passed at a meeting of the Board of Director with the consent of all the directors present at the meeting and the prior approval of the public financial institution (PFI) concerned where any term loan is subsisting is obtained.

Conclusion:

In the above problem, the Board of Directors of XYZ Ltd. while considering the proposal for making the investment in ABC Ltd. has not complied with the provision of section 186(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, where the consent of all the directors present at the meeting is required.

The resolution of the board of directors therefore is not valid and has no legal effect.

Short Notes

Question 1. Write short note on the following:

  1. Related Party not to vote on resolution
  2. Arm’s length transaction

Answer:

Second Proviso to Section 188 (1) of the Act provides that no member of the company shall vote on such resolution, to approve any contract or arrangement which may be entered into by the company, if such member is a related party.

This shall not apply to a company in which ninety per cent. or more members, in number, are relatives of promoters or are related parties.

  • Exemption to Private Companies: In case of private companies second proviso shall not apply (Notification No. GSR 464(E) dated5-6-2015).
  • Exemption to Government Companies: In case of Government companies above mentioned Second Proviso to the section 188 (1) of the Act shall not apply to –
    • a Government company in respect of contracts or arrangements entered into by it with any other Government company or with Central Government or any State Government or any Combination thereof;
    • a Government company other than a listed company, in respect of contracts or arrangements other than those referred to in clause (a), in case such company obtains approval of the Ministry or Department of the Central Government which is administratively in charge of the company, or, as the case may be the State Government before entering into such contract or arrangement. (Notification No. GSR 463(E) dated5-6-2015).
  • As per the explanation (2) to Section 188(1) of the Act, the expression “arm’s length transaction” means a transaction between two related parties that is conducted as if they were unrelated, so that there is no conflict of interest.
  • The phrase ‘on an arm’s length basis’ is in fact ‘at arm’s length’ or ‘an arm’s length relationship’ which means avoiding intimacy or close contact. The phrase ‘at arm’s length’ in relation to dealings between two parties is used to refer to dealings when neither party is controlled by the other.
  • Arm’s length is the condition or fact that the parties to a transaction are independent and on an equal footing. Arm’s length transaction is a transaction between unrelated persons or organizations, in which there is no improper influence exercisable by one party over another, and no conflict of interests of or relating to dealings between two parties who are not related or not on close terms and who are presumed to have roughly equal bargaining power; not involving a confidential relationship.
  • Parties are said to deal at “arm’s length” when they conduct the business without being subject to the other’s control or overmastering influence. An arm’s length transaction is a transaction between companies or people that do not have close contact or any financial connections and be or deal at arm’s length means without a close relationship with a person or a company.
  • The burden to establish that a transaction was at arm’s length would be on the company and there must be sufficient and pertinent material to prove that the terms of the transaction with a related party were purely commercial and the same as in the case of a transaction between the company and a non- related party and there were no extra-commercial considerations.

Descriptive Questions

Question 2. Discuss the role of Audit Committee in Related Party transactions.

Answer:

Section 177(4)(iv) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the terms of reference of Audit Committee shall include approval or any subsequent modification of transactions of the company with related parties;

Provided that the Audit Committee may make omnibus approval for related party transactions proposed to be entered into by the company subject to such conditions as may be prescribed;

Thus, it is the responsibility of the audit committee to approve the transactions of the company with related parties.

As per Rule 6A of Companies (Meeting of Board and its Powers) Second Amendment Rules, 2015, the audit committee may make omnibus approval for all related party transactions proposed to be entered into by the company subject to the following conditions, namely –

  • The Audit Committee shall, after obtaining approval of the Board of Directors, specify the criteria for making the omnibus approval which shall include the following, namely:
    • maximum value of the transactions, in the aggregate, which can be allowed under the omnibus route in a year;
    • the maximum value per transaction that can be allowed;
    • extent and manner of disclosures to be made to the Audit. Committee at the time of seeking omnibus approval;
    • review, at such intervals as the Audit Committee may deem fit, related party transactions entered into by the company pursuant to each of the omnibus approvals made;
    • transactions that cannot be subject to the omnibus approval by the Audit Committee.
  • The Audit Committee shall consider the following factors while specifying the criteria for making omnibus approval, namely:
    • The repetitiveness of the transactions (in the past or future);
    • Justification for the need for omnibus approval.
  • The Audit Committee shall satisfy itself on the need for omnibus approval for transactions of a repetitive nature and that such approval is in the interest of the company.
  • The omnibus approval shall contain or indicate the following:-
    • Name of the related parties;
    • Nature and duration of the transaction;
    • The maximum amount of transactions that can be entered into;
    • The indicative base price or current contracted price and the formula for variation in the price, if any; and
    • Any other information relevant or important for the Audit Committee to decide on the proposed transaction:
      Provided that where the need for related party transaction cannot be foreseen and aforesaid details are not available, the audit committee may make ‘omnibus approval for such transactions subject to their value not exceeding rupees one crore per transaction.
  • Omnibus approval shall be valid for a period not exceeding one financial year and shall require fresh approval after the expiry of such financial year.
  • Omnibus approval shall not be made for transactions in respect of selling or disposing of the undertaking of the company. Space to write important points for revision

Question 3. Which companies are exempt from the provisions about loans and investments by companies?

Answer:

Non Applicability of Section 186

Exemptions

Sub-section (11) of Section 186 provides that nothing contained in this section, except sub-Section (1), shall apply-

  • to any loan made, any guarantee given any security provided or any investment made by a banking company, an insurance company, a housing finance company in the ordinary course of its business, or a company established with the object of and engaged in the business of financing industrial enterprises, or of providing infrastructural facilities;
  • to any investment-
    • made by an investment company;
    • made in shares allotted in pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 62 or in shares allotted in pursuance of rights issues made by a body corporate;
    • made, in respect of investment or lending activities, by a non-banking financial company registered under Chapter III-B of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and whose principal business is the acquisition of securities.

Exemption from Applicability of Section 186 to Government Company Given the Central Government’s notification dated 5th June 2015 under Section 462 of the Companies Act, 2013, Section 186 shall not apply to:

  • a Government company engaged in defense production;
  • a Government company, other than a listed company, in case such company obtains approval of the Ministry or Department of the Central Government which is administratively in charge of the company, or, as the case may be, the State Government before making any loan or giving any guarantee or providing any security or making any investment under the section.

Penalty for Contravention of Section 186

If a company contravenes the provisions of this section, the company shall be punishable with a fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years and with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees.

CS Company Law – Accounts Audit And Auditors Question and Answers

 Accounts, Audit And Auditors

Books of Accounts

Proper books of accounts shall be deemed to have been kept by a company if such books exhibit and explain the transactions and financial position of the business of the company, including books containing sufficiently detailed entries of daily cash receipts and payments.

Kept Book of A/c

Every company is required to keep books of account at its registered office in respect of specified transactions. However, all or any of the books of accounts may be kept at such other place in India as the Board of directors may decide.

Inspection Book of A/c

As per the Act, books of account and other books and papers should be available for inspection by any director on working days during business hours.

Persons Responsible to Maintain Books

  • Managing Director,
  • Whole-Time Director, in charge of finance
  • Chief Financial Officer; or
  • Any other person of a company charged by the Board with duty of complying with provisions of Section 128.

Financial Statement Section 129

This section provides that the financial statements shall give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company or companies in the form as provided for different class or classes in Schedule III and shall comply with accounting standards notified under Section 133 of the Act.

Insurance companies, banking company, companies engaged in generation/supply of electricity or any other class of companies shall make financial statements in the form as has been specified in or under the Act governing such companies.

The financial statement shall be laid in the annual general meeting of that financial year. [Section 129(2)]

Consolidated Financial Statements

The Companies Act, 2013 has made preparation of consolidated accounts mandatory for all companies including unlisted companies and private companies having one or more subsidiaries or associates or joint ventures.

Signature of Financial Statement

The financial statement, including consolidated financial statement, if any, shall be approved by the Board of Directors before they are signed on behalf of the Board by the chairperson of the company where he is authorised by the Board or by two directors out of which one shall be managing director, if any, and the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the company secretary of the company, wherever they are appointed, or in the case of One Person Company, only by one director, for submission to the auditor for his report thereon.

The auditors’ report shall be attached to every financial statement. A report by its Board of Directors shall also be attached to statements laid before a company in general meeting.

National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)

Through Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government has introduced a new regulatory authority named as National Authority for Financial Reporting known as National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) with wide powers to recommend, enforce and monitor the compliance of accounting and auditing standards.

NFRA shall be responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance of auditing and accounting standards and for that purpose, oversee the quality of professions associated with ensuring such compliances. The Authority shall investigate professional and other misconducts which may be committed by Chartered Accountancy members and firms.

Accounting Standards

The Act provides that every financial statement of the company shall comply with the accounting standards.

Object of Audit

The main object of audit is to ensure that the statement of accounts of the relevant financial year truly and fairly reflect the state of affairs of the company. Audit also provides a moral check on those who are entrusted with the task of running business and of keeping and maintaining the books of account of the company. An audit of accounts is conducted with two-fold purpose:

  • detection and prevention of errors;
  • detection and prevention of fraud.

Appointment of Auditors

The Act provides that every company shall, at each annual general meeting appoint an auditor or auditors to hold office from the conclusion of that meeting until the conclusion of next annual general meeting. The Act also provides for methods of appointment of auditors along with their qualifications and disqualifications.

Auditor’s Report

The Act provides that the auditor’s report shall be signed only by the person appointed as an auditor of the company..

Appointment of First Auditor [Section 139(6)]

Appointment of first auditor in case of every company except government company or company owned/ controlled by Central Government/State Government/Central Government and State Government [Section 139(6)]:

  • The first auditor of a company, other than a Government company, shall be appointed by the Board within thirty days from the date of registration of the company and if the Board fails to appoint such auditor, it shall inform the members of the company and the members shall make the appointment of first auditor within ninety days of information at an extra ordinary general meeting and such auditor shall hold office till the conclusion of the first annual general meeting.
  • Appointment of first auditor shall be made by Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) within sixty days of registration of the company. If CAG fails to appoint the first auditor within given time then Board of such company shall appoint first auditor within next 30 days. If Board fails to appoint the first auditor within given time then it shall inform to members and members shall make the appointment of first auditor within 60 days of information at an extra ordinary general meeting. The First Auditor shall hold office till the conclusion of first AGM.

Appointment of auditors at AGM (first AGM and subsequent AGM)

Appointment of auditor shall be made by members at First AGM and every subsequent 6th AGM. At the first AGM, every company shall appoint an individual or a firm as an auditor. The auditor so appointed shall hold office from the conclusion of first AGM till the conclusion of 6th AGM.

Rotation of Auditor

In case of an individual as auditor:

  • No individual shall be appointed or re-appointed as auditor for more than 1 term of 5 consecutive years.
  • An individual auditor, who has completed his term of 5 consecutive years, shall not be eligible for re-appointment as auditor in the same company for 5 years from the date of completion.

In case of a firm as an auditor:

  • No audit firm shall be appointed or re-appointed as auditor for more than 2 terms of 5 consecutive years.
  • An audit firm which has completed its 2 terms of 5 consecutive years, shall not be eligible for re-appointment as auditor in the same company for 5 years from the completion of such terms.
  • If any firm/LLP which has one or more partners who are also partners in the outgoing audit firm/LLP, cannot be appointed as auditors during the 5 year period.

Appointment of an Auditor in Casual Vacancy

Casual vacancy arising by other than resignation: Whereas casual vacancy is arising by other than resignation then vacancy shall be filled by the Board within 30 days.

Casual vacancy arising due to resignation: If casual vacancy is arising due to the resignation of auditor, it shall be filled within 30 days by the Board of Directors, and the appointment made by the Board shall be approved in a general meeting convened within 3 months from the date of recommendation of the Board.

Appointment of auditor in Casual Vacancy in case of Govt. Company

Casual vacancy shall be filled by the CAG within 30 days. If CAG fails to fill the vacancy within given time then BOD shall fill the vacancy within next 30 days.

Auditors not to render certain services

  • accounting and book keeping services;
  • internal audit;
  • design and implementation of any financial information system;
  • actuarial services;
  • investment advisory services;
  • investment banking services;
  • rendering of outsourced financial services;

Cost Auditor

  • Every company referred to in sub-rule (1) shall inform the cost auditor concerned of his or its appointment as such and file a notice of such appointment with the Central Government within a period of thirty days of the Board Meeting in which such appointment is made or within a period of one hundred and eighty days of the commencement of the financial year, whichever is earlier, through electronic mode, in form CRA-2,
  • After the expiry of thirty days, the company shall issue formal letter of appointment to the cost auditor.
  • Every cost auditor, who conducts an audit of the cost records of a company, shall submit the cost audit report along with his or its reservations or qualifications or observations or suggestions, if any, in form CRA-3.
  • Every cost auditor shall forward his report to the Board of Directors of the company within a period of one hundred and eighty days from the closure of the financial year.
  • Every company covered under these rules shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of the cost audit report, furnish the Central Government with such report alongwith full information and explanation on every reservation or qualification contained therein, in form CRA-4 along with fees specified in the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.

The company shall disclose full particulars of the cost auditor, along with the due date and actual date of filing of the cost audit report by the cost auditor, in its Annual Report for each relevant financial year.

Branch Audit Section 143 (8) and Rule 12

Branch Auditor: Accounts of branch office can be audited by-

  • The company’s auditor; or
  • Any other person, qualified to be and appointed as an auditor as per the provisions of the Act as branch auditor; or
  • In case of foreign branch, by the company ‘s auditor or by an accountant or a competent person appointed in accordance with the prevailing laws of the foreign country.

The branch auditor shall prepare a report on the accounts of the branch examined by him and the company’s auditor shall deal with such report in his audit report in a manner as he considers necessary.

Secretarial Audit

Secretarial Audit is a compliance audit and it is a part of total compliance management in an organisation. The Secretarial Audit is an effective tool for corporate compliance management. It helps to detect non-compliance and to take corrective measures.

Secretarial Audit is an independent, objective assurance intended to add value and improve an organisation’s operations. It helps to accomplish the organisation’s objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.

As per rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, the prescribed class of companies is as under:

  • every public company having a paid-up share capital of fifty crore rupees or more; or
  • every public company having a turnover of two hundred fifty crore rupees or more.

Note: As per Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Amendment Rules, 2020

  • with this insertion in Rule 9(1) of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, now every company having outstanding loans or borrowing from banks or public financial institutions of one hundred crore rupees or more is also required to annex the Secretarial Audit report with its Boards Report. MCA has also clarified that for the purpose of this rule paid up share capital, turnover, or outstanding loans or borrowings as the case may be, existing on the last date of latest audited financial statement shall be taken into account.

List of Important Forms

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors List Of Important Forms

Short Notes

Question 1. Write a short note on ‘appointment of cost auditor’.

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Appointment of Cost Auditor

Question 2. Write a note on the following:

Intangible assets

Answer:

Intangible means “that cannot be touched.”

Some of the assets are such which cannot be touched and do not have physical existence and are called intangible assets.

For example:

  • Goodwill
  • Brands/trademarks
  • Computer software
  • Mining rights
  • Recipes formulae, models, designs and proto types.

Question 3. Write a note on the following:

Approval and signing of the financial statement.

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Financial Statement

Question 4. Write a note on the following:

Qualifications and disqualifications of auditors.

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Qualifications of Auditor

Question 5. Distinguish between the following:

‘Internal Audit’ and ‘Secretarial Audit’.

Answer:

‘Internal Audit’ and ‘Secretarial Audit’

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Internal Audit

Descriptive Questions

Question 1. Comment on the following:

It is not obligatory for every company to preserve its books of account.

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Authenticity of the Statement

Question 2. Comment on the following:

Adoption of accounts is an important business to be transacted only at general meetings. 

Answer:

  • An important business to be transacted at an annual general meeting is adoption of the accounts including:
    • Financial Statement (including consolidated financial statement)
    • Director Report and
    • Auditor Report
  • The financial statements are required to be placed only at an annual general meeting and not at any other general meeting.
  • In case, if the financial statements are not ready for laying at the annual general meeting, the company may adjourn the said annual general meeting to a subsequent date. This may be done by adopting an appropriate resolution adjourning the said annual general meeting to a specified date or to a date to be specified later. -Space to write important points for revision

Question 3. Comment on the following:

Where a company has a branch office, whether in India or abroad, the original books of account, records, etc. of the branch office will have to be maintained in the registered office of the company.

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Registered office of the company

Question 4. Comment on the following:

A director of a company has an absolute right of inspection of the books of account.

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Section 128(3)

Question 5. Mention the importance of ‘notes on accounts’. Will it convey any meaning to stakeholders?

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Notes on Accounts

Question 6. “Financial statements shall be signed only by the Chairperson of the company.” Explain.

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Section 134

Note:

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017

Revised Section 134(1)-

“The financial statement, including consolidated financial statement, if any, shall be approved by the Board of Directors before they are signed on behalf of the Board by the chairperson of the company where he is authorised by the Board or by two directors out of which one shall be managing director, if any, and the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the company secretary of the company, wherever they are appointed, or in the case of One Person Company, only by one director, for submission to the auditor for his report thereon.”

Revised Section 134(3)(a)-

“(a) the web address, if any, where annual return referred to in sub-section (3) of Section 92 has been placed;”

Revised Section 134(3)(p)-

“(p) in case of a listed company and every other public company having such paid-up share capital as may be prescribed, a statement indicating the manner in which formal annual evaluation of the performance of the Board, its Committees and of individual directors has been made.”

Provison to Revised Section 134(3)-

“Provided that where disclosures referred to in this sub-section have been included in the financial statements, such disclosures shall be referred to instead of being repeated in the Board’s report:

Provided further that where the policy referred to in clause (e) or clause (0) is made available on company’s website, if any, it shall be sufficient compliance of the requirements under such clauses if the salient features of the policy and any change therein are specified in brief in the Board’s report and the web- address is indicated therein at which the complete policy is available.”

Section 134(3A)-

“(3A) The Central Government may prescribe an abridged Board’s report, for the purpose of compliance with this section by a One Person Company or small company.”

Question 7. Explain the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to ‘secretarial audit’. State whether ‘secretarial audit’ is mandatory for all companies.

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Secretarial audit

Answer the following by explaining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to ‘internal audit’:

  1. Whether a private company is mandatorily required to appoint an internal auditor?
  2. Who may be appointed as an internal auditor? Whether a Practicing Company Secretary (PCS) can be appointed as an internal auditor?

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Section 138

Question 8. Explain with reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, the meaning and importance of ‘secretarial audit’. Which companies are required to get the ‘secretarial audit’ conducted?

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Secretarial audit conducted

Question 9. Comment on the following:

The time gap between the date of approval of financial statements by the Board of directors of a company and the date of notice of annual general meeting should be 45 days. 

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Section 101

Question 10. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, explain whether the Company Secretary being a Chief Financial Officer of the company can be held liable for maintenance of books of account of the company. 

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Persons responsible to maintain books

Question 11. Comment on the following:

  1. Consolidation of financial statements is mandatory for all companies including unlisted companies and private companies.
  2. A statutory auditor of a private limited company is restricted to take up any other assignment in the companies. 

Answer:

The Companies Act, 2013 has made preparation of consolidated accounts mandatory for all companies including unlisted companies and private companies having one or more subsidiaries or associates or joint ventures.

In accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, as contained in Section 129(3), where a company has one or more subsidiaries or associates or joint ventures, it shall, in addition to its financial statements for the financial year, prepare a consolidated financial statement of the company and of all the subsidiaries or associates or joint ventures in the same form and manner as that of its own which shall also be laid before the annual general meeting of the company along with the laying of its financial statements, a separate statement containing the salient features of the financial statements of its subsidiaries or associate (s) or joint venture (s) in Form AOC -1 (Rule 5).

However, for intermediate holding company, the provisions of Rule 6 of Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 inter alia provide certain conditions, compliance of which ensures exemption from consolidation of accounts to such intermediate holding company. These conditions are:-

  • intimation to all members for not consolidating the accounts.
  • shares being unlisted or not in process of listing on any stock exchanges and filing of consolidated financial statement by the ultimate Indian holding company whose 100% subsidiary is the intermediate holding company.

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 Revised Section 129(3)-

“Where a company has one or more subsidiaries or associate companies, it shall, in addition to financial statements provided under sub-section (2), prepare a consolidated financial statement of the company and of all the subsidiaries and associate companies in the same form and manner as that of its own and in accordance with applicable accounting standards, which shall also be laid before the annual general meeting of the company along with the laying of its financial statement under sub-section (2):

Provided that the company shall also attach along with its financial statement, a separate statement containing the salient features of the financial statement of its subsidiary or subsidiaries and associate company or companies in such form as may be prescribed:

Provided further that the Central Government may provide for the consolidation of accounts of companies in such manner as may be prescribed.”

An auditor appointed under this Act shall provide to the company only such other services as are approved by the Board of Directors or the audit committee, as the case may be, (of the company concerned) but which shall not include any of the following services (whether such services are rendered directly or indirectly to the company or its holding company or subsidiary company, namely:

  • accounting and book keeping services
  • internal audit
  • design and implementation of any financial information system
  • actuarial services
  • investment advisory services
  • investment banking service
  • rendering of outsourced financial services
  • management services and
  • any other kind of services as may be prescribed.

Question 12. Comment on the following:

Appointment and rotation of statutory auditor is mandatory for one person company and small company.

Answer:

As per Section 139(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 inter alia provides that every company shall, at the first annual general meeting, appoint an individual or a firm as an auditor who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of its sixth annual general meeting and thereafter till conclusion of every sixth meeting.

The Companies Act, 2013 has introduced the system of rotation of auditors under Section 139. As per Rule 5 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, rotation of auditors is applicable to:

  • All listed companies;
  • All unlisted public companies having paid up share capital of 10 crore or more;
  • All private limited companies having paid up share capital of ₹ 50 crore or more;
  • All companies having paid up share capital of below threshold limit mentioned in (a) and (b) above, but having public borrowings from financial institutions, banks or public deposits of 50 crore or more. In view of the above it is clear that appointment is applicable on all the Companies including one person companies and small companies, however, the provisions of rotation of auditors shall not apply to one person companies and small companies.

Question 13. Perfect Pvt. Ltd. wishes to appoint its Secretary, Satish, as an internal auditor. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 advise the company.

Answer:

According to Section 138(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the Rule 13 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, following persons may be appointed as an internal auditor of the company:

  • a Chartered Accountant or;
  • a Cost Accountant or;
  • such other professional as may be decided by the Board to conduct internal audit of the functions and activities of the Company.

Further, Rule 13 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 inter alia provides that the internal auditor may or may not be an employee of the Company. Mr. Satish being the Secretary of Perfect Ltd. may be appointed as an internal auditor of the company only if so decided by the Board to conduct internal audit of the functions and activities of the Company.

Question 14. Who will appoint Secretarial Auditor of the company: Board of Directors or Shareholders? What is the duty of Board of Directors towards secretarial auditor and audit report?

Answer:

  • According to Section 204, every listed company and every public company having paid up share capital of fifty crore rupees or more; or public company having a turnover of two hundred fifty crore rupees or more shall attach a Secretarial Audit Report given by Practicing Company Secretary (PCS).
  • As per Section 179 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 8 of the Companies (Meeting of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, the Board of Directors, only by means of resolutions passed at meetings of the Board, shall appoint a Secretarial Auditor.
  • It shall be the duty of the company to give all assistance and facilities to the Company Secretary in Practice (Secretarial Auditor), for auditing the secretarial and related records of the company. (Section 204(2))
  • The Board of Directors, in their report shall explain in full any qualification or observation or other remarks made by the company secretary in practice in his report.

Question 15. Comment on the following:

Chief Financial Officer is responsible to maintain books of account of the company.

Answer:

As per Section 128 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that to maintenance of Books of accounts by the company. According to sub section. (6) of Section 128 if the Managing Director, the Whole-Time Director in charge of finance, the Chief Financial Officer or any other person of a company charged by the Board with the duty of complying with the provisions of Section 128, fails to comply with the provisions shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees.

Accordingly it is the responsibility of the Chief Financial Officer along with Managing Director and whole time director in charge of finance of the company to maintain the Books of Accounts of the company. -Space to write important points for revision

Question 16. Every financial statement of the company must give true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company at the end of the financial year. 

Answer:

As per provisions of sub-Sections (1) and (2) of Section 129 of the Companies Act 2013 every financial statement of the company must give true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company at the end of financial year. True and Fair view in respect of financial statement means-

  • Financial statements and items contained should comply with accounting standards notified under Section 133;
  • Financial statement shall be in form or forms as provided for different ‘class or classes of companies in Schedule III;
  • Financial statement shall not be treated as not disclosing a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company, merely by the reason of the fact that they do not disclose-
    • in the case of an insurance company, any matters which are not required to be disclosed by the Insurance Act, 1938, or the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999;
    • in the case of a banking company, any matters which are not required to be disclosed by the Banking Regulation Act, 1949;
    • in the case of a company engaged in the generation or supply of electricity, any matters which are not required to be disclosed by the Electricity Act, 2003;
    • in the case of a company governed by any other law for the time being in force, any matters which are not required to be disclosed by that law.

Question 17. An application has been made by a shareholder of a company to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) that the company which has been just incorporated has supplied incorrect information in the documents filed for incorporation. Examine what action can be taken by the NCLT if the contention of the shareholder is proved to be true?

Answer:

Under Section 7(7) of the Companies Act, 2013, where a company has got incorporated by furnishing any false or incorrect information or representation or by suppressing any material fact or information in any of the documents or declaration filed or made for incorporating such company or by any fraudulent action, the National Company Law Tribunal may on an application made to it, on being satisfied that the situation so warrants:

  • Pass such orders as it may think fit for regulation of the management of the company including changes, if any, in its Memorandum and Articles, in public interest or in the interest of the company and its members and creditors; or
  • Direct that the liability of the members shall be unlimited; or
  • Direct removal of the name of the company from the register of companies; or
  • Pass an order for winding up of the company; or
  • Pass any such orders as it deems fit.

Question 18. Books of account have to be kept only at the registered office of the company. As a corporate consultant give your comments in this regard. 

Answer:

According to Section 128(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 requires every company to prepare and keep the books of accounts and other relevant books and papers and financial statements for every financial year at its registered office.

Although, all or any of the books of accounts and other relevant papers may be kept at such other place in India as the Board of Directors may decide.

  • When the Board of Directors so decides, the company shall, within 7 days of such decision, file with the Registrar of Companies, a notice in writing giving full address of that other place.
  • Such intimation is to be made in e-form AOC 5 to the Registrar of Companies.

Therefore, Board of Directors of the company may decide any place, other than the Registered office of the company for keeping the books of accounts.

Question 19. Comment on the following:

National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has wide powers to recommend, enforce and monitor the compliance of accounting and auditing standards.

Answer:

National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)

  • Through Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government has introduced a new regulatory authority named as National Authority for Financial Reporting known as National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) with wide powers to recommend, enforce and monitor the compliance of accounting and auditing standards.
  • NFRA is responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance of auditing and accounting standards and for that purpose, oversee the quality of professions associated with ensuring such compliances. The Authority has power to investigate professional and other misconducts which may be committed by Chartered Accountancy members and firms. There is also a provision for appellate authority.
  • The National Financial Reporting Authority is a quasi-judicial body to regulate matters related to accounting and auditing. With increasing demand of non-financial reporting, it may be referred to as a National level business Reporting Authority to regulate standards of all kind of reporting-financial as well as non-financial, by the companies in future.
  • National Financial Reporting Authority shall give its recommendations on accounting standards and auditing standards. It shall only recommend and it is the Central Government who shall prescribe such standards.
  • The objectives of National Financial Reporting Authority are as follows:
    • Make recommendations on formulation of accounting and auditing policies and standards for adoption by companies, class of companies or their auditors;
    • Monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards and auditing standards;
    • Oversee the quality of service of professionals associated with ensuring compliance with such standards and suggest measures required for improvement in quality of service; and
    • Perform such other functions as may be prescribed in relation to aforementioned objectives.

Practical Questions

Question 1. The Board of directors of Grow More Ltd., a public company, has duly delegated its power to approve the financial statements of the company for the year 2011-12 to a committee of directors. The said committee considered the financial statements and approved the same before the accounts were handed over to the statutory auditor of the company. Will you accept such approval of financial statements?

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Analysis of the statement

Question 2. An auditor of a company signed the financial statement including Financial Statement and schedules/notes and furnished the auditors report on the same date on which the reports were signed by the directors on behalf of the Board. One of the directors raised objection stating that the audit can not be completed and certified in a day. Do you agree with the director and if not, why? 

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Section 141(3)

Question 3. A director of the company along with another director was prosecuted for their failure to file annual return, financial statements and audited balance sheet required to be laid before the AGM. The directors filed petition before the Tribunal to quash the prosecution initiated by the Registrar of Companies. As a Company Secretary in Practice, advise in the matter.

Answer:

  • Section 137 requires every company to file the financial statements including consolidated financial statement together with Form AOC-4
  • with the Registrar within 30 days from the day on which the annual general meeting held and adopted the financial statements with such fees or additional fee as specified in Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.
  • If the financial statements are not adopted at the annual general meeting or adjourned annual general meeting, such unadopted financial statements along with the required documents be filed with the Registrar with in thirty days of the date of annual general meeting. The Registrar shall take them in his record as provisional, until the adoption at annual general meeting.
  • The One Person Company shall file the copy of financial statements duly adopted by its members within a period of one hundred and eighty days from the closure of financial year.
  • The company shall also attach the accounts of subsidiaries incorporated outside India and which have not established their place of business in India with the financial statements.
  • The class of companies as may be notified by the Central Government from time to time, shall mandatorily file their financial statement in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) format and the Central Government may specify the manner of such filing under such notification for such class of companies [Rule 12(2).]
  • If annual general meeting has not been held, the financial statement duly signed along with the statement of facts and reasons for not holding the annual general meeting shall be filed with the Registrar within thirty days of the last days before which the annual general meeting should have been held.
  • If company fails to comply with the requirement of submission of financial statement before Registrar, the company shall be liable to penalty of one thousand rupees for every day during which failure continues subject to maximum of rupees ten lakh.
  • The managing director and CFO if any, and, in the absence of such managing director or CFO, any other director who is charged by the Board with the responsibility of complying with the provisions of this
  • section, in the absence of such director, all directors of the company shall be liable to a penalty of 10,000 and in case of continuing failure, with a further penalty of 100 for each day after the first during which such failure continues, subject to a maximum of 50,000. As per Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020.

Question 4. Vir is a director in DJA Ltd. (the company). The company holds 75% shares of MRN Ltd. Vir wants to inspect the books of MRN Ltd. Examining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 advise whether Vir, the director of DJA Ltd. can be allowed to inspect the books of MRN Ltd.

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Analysis of given the case

Question 5. Manohar, the auditor of Belle Ltd. appointed by the company in its last general meeting has resigned from the office of auditor of the company for some personal reasons. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, answer the following:

  1. Who is the competent authority to accept and approve the resignation?
  2. State the manner in which the vacancy caused by Manohar’s resignation shall be filled in. 

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Section 140(2)

Question 6. Adorable Ltd., incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 has on its Board, 5 Directors and a Managing Director. The company has also appointed a Company Secretary. The financial statements of the company, viz., balance sheet and statement of profit and loss for the year ended 31st March, 2015, were authenticated under signatures of one director and the Company Secretary.

Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, examine the validity of authentication. What shall be your answer in case the company in question is a ‘one person company’?

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Analysis of the Present Case

Question 7. The paid-up equity share capital of Strong Foundry Ltd. is 45 lakh. President (Finance) of the company seeks your advice whether it is possible to re-open its books of account and recast the company’s financial statements of the previous year. You being the Secretary of the company, advise the President (Finance) by preparing a note in this regard.

Answer:

Re-opening of Accounts on Tribunals’s Orders: Section 130 provides for provisions relating to re-opening or re- casting of books of accounts of the company. Accordingly,

  • A company shall not re-open its books of account and shall not recast its financial statements, unless an application in this regard is made by any one or more of the following:
    • the Central Government, or
    • the Income-tax authorities, or
    • the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), or
    • any other statutory regulatory body or authority or any person concerned, and
    • an order in this regard is made by a Tribunal of competent jurisdiction or the Tribunal.
  • The re-opening and re-casting of financial statements is permitted only for the following reasons:
    • the relevant earlier accounts were prepared in a fraudulent manner; or
    • the affairs of the company were mismanaged during the relevant period, casting a doubt on the reliability of financial statements.
  • The Tribunal, as the case may be, shall give the notice to:
    • the Central Government,
    • the Income-tax authorities,
    • the Securities and Exchange Board,
    • any other statutory regulatory body or authority concerned and shall take into consideration the representations, if any, made by Central Government or the income tax authorities, Securities and Exchange Board or the body or authority concerned before passing any order under this section.
  • Director’s report of the year in which such provisions are invoked, should provide for the reasons or circumstances in which. such revisions were warranted.

Further, Section 131 deals with power of Board to make application to tribunal and obtain approval for voluntary revision of financial statements and Board’s Report of any of the preceding three financial years.

Hence, one time revision of financial accounts of the company may be made after, obtaining approval of the tribunal subject to applicability and enforceability of Section 131 of Companies Act, 2013.

This is for information and record please.

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 Section 130(3): No order shall be made under sub-section (1) in respect of re-opening of books of account relating to a period earlier than eight financial years immediately preceding the current financial year:

Provided that where a direction has been issued by the Central Government under the proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 128 for keeping of books of account for a period longer than eight years, the books of account may be ordered to be re-opened within such longer period.

Question 8. Peculiar Ltd., an unlisted company, did not prepare its financial statements for the year ended 31st March, 2016 in conformity with some of the mandatory accounting standards. With reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, state the responsibilities of the directors and statutory auditors of the company in this regard.

Answer:

  • In accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 as contained in Section 129 read with Section 133 financial statements of a company shall be prepared in compliance with the accounting standards.
  • Section 129(5) states that where the financial statements of the company do not comply with accounting standards, such companies shall disclose in its profit and loss account and the balance sheet-
  • the deviation from the accounting standards;
  • the reasons for such deviation; and
  • the financial effects, if any, arising out of such deviation. The Board of Directors is required under Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013 to include, in Board’s report, a Director’s Responsibility Statement indicating therein that in the preparation of the financial statements, the applicable accounting standards have been followed along with proper explanation relating to material departures.
  • As per this provision the directors need to ensure that the financial statements are prepared in accordance with the accounting standards.
  • The statutory auditor of the company has a duty to state if, in his opinion, the financial statements are not in compliance comply with accounting standards.

Question 9. Novel LLP, Trademark and Patent Attorneys, have been successfully running their business for the last five years. They have fixed assets in the form of intangibles (software) worth 75 lakh in their balance sheet. Advise as to whether their accounts are to be audited. 

Answer:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Section 34(4)

Question 10. Board of Directors of Anil Limited has decided not to preserve the books of accounts and other related records of accounts, for more than five years immediately preceding the relevant financial year of 2016-17 due to shortage of space in the office premises. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, examine the validity of the Board’s decision. 

Mr. X is a director is Greenfield Industries Limited. He is a man of wide knowledge of commercial matters. The company has not filed financial statements with the Registrar of Companies for the years ended 31st March, 2014, 31st March, 2015 and 31st March, 2016. However, it has filed the annual returns for those years in compliance of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Considering Mr. X’s huge experience, Redfield Industries Limited wants to induct him as a director on its Board. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 examine the validity of such proposition.

Answer:

According to sub-section (5) of Section 128 of the Companies Act, 2013, the books of accounts, together with vouchers relevant to any entry in such books are required to be preserved for a period of not less than eight financial years immediately preceding a financial year. Where the company had been in existence for a period less than eight years, the books of account in respect of all the preceding years together with the vouchers relevant to any entry in such books of account shall be kept in good order.

The provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 shall also be complied with in this regard. As per proviso to sub-section (5) of Section128, where an investigation has been ordered in respect of the company under Chapter XIV, the Central Government may direct that the books of account may be kept for such longer period as it may deem fit and give directions to that effect.

The decision taken by the Board of Directors of Anil Limited is not in accordance with the provisions of the law and the company cannot do

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 Section 164(2) also provides that no person who is or has been a director of a company which –

  • Has not filed financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of three financial years; or
  • Has failed to repay the deposits accepted by it or pay interest thereon or to redeem any debentures on the due date or pay interest due thereon or pay any dividend declared and such failure to pay or redeem continues for one, year or more, shall be eligible to be re-appointed as a director of that company or appointed in other company for a period of five years from the date on which the said company fails to do so.

In the given case, Greenfield Industries Limited has not filed its financial statements for the financial years ended 31st March, 2014, 31st March, 2015 and 31st March, 2016. Therefore, it has not filed such statements for a continuous period of 3 financial years. However, it has filed annual return for those 3 financial years. Non-filing of any one of financial statements or annual returns for a continuous period of 3 financial years will disqualify such director from being appointed as a director in any other company.

Applying the above provisions of Section 164(2)(a), in the given case, Mr. X, a director of Greenfield Industries Limited cannot be appointed as a director in Redfield Industries Limited till the expiry of five years.

Question 11. CIF Technosystems Private Limited is proposed to be incorporated in Bhubaneshwar, Orissa under the Companies Act, 2013. The company will be a holding company of CIF Holding Private Limited, already incorporated in Brazil under the Company Law of Brazil. The company in Brazil follows financial year 1st January to 31st December of a calendar year. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, state whether the financial year of CIF Technosystem can also be 1st January to 31st December, in order to make it easier to prepare consolidated financial statements.

Answer:

Section 2(41) of the Companies Act, 2013 has defined the term “financial year”. It states that financial year in relation to any company or body corporate, means the period ending on the 31st day of March every year.

The financial year of every company registered under the Companies Act in India has to be from April of a calendar year to March of the next calendar year.

However, proviso to Section 2(41) reads that on an application made by a company or body corporate, which is a holding company or a subsidiary or Associated company of a company incorporated outside India and is required to follow a different financial year for consolidation of its accounts outside India, the Central Government may, if it is satisfied, allow any period as its financial year.

As per Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019

Where a company or body corporate, which is a holding company or a subsidiary or associate company of a company incorporated outside India and is required to follow a different financial year for consolidation of its accounts outside India, the Central Government may, on an application made by that company or body corporate in such form and manner as may be prescribed, allow any period as its financial year, whether or not that period is a year-first proviso to Section 2(41) of Companies Act, 2013 as amended vide the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019.

Earlier, the powers were with NCLT. Applications pending with NCLT as on 2.11.2018 will continue to be dealt by NCLT-second proviso to Section 2(41) of Companies Act, 2013 as inserted vide the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019.

Provision as existing upto 2.11.2018- On an application made by a company or body corporate, which is a holding company or a subsidiary or associate company of a company incorporated outside India and is required to follow a different financial year for consolidation of its accounts outside India, the NCLT may, if it is satisfied, allow any period as its financial year, whether or not that period is a year [first proviso to Section 2(41) of Companies Act, 2013 as existing upto 2.11.2018]. [The words in italics were added w.e.f. 9.2.2018].

On the basis of position of law here in above, CIF Technosystems Private Limited proposed to be incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 has to have its financial year to end on 31st March every calendar year.

However, as it is a holding company of CIF Private Limited, a company in Brazil incorporated outside India, and that company follows its financial year 1st January to 31st December of a calendar year, the Indian company CIF Technosystems Private Limited can apply to Tribunal to allow its financial year to be aligned to end on 31st December for ease of consolidation of financial statement. The Tribunal will decide on the basis of merit in application.

Question 12. XYZ Ltd. has 6 directors on its Board of Directors. Out of 6 directors, 5 are foreigners and they reside in America. The company wants to convene its Board meeting in Mumbai but all the 5 directors are pre- occupied and are not in a position to travel to India. Advice the company regarding conduct of such a Board meeting as per provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and relevant Rules. Will the same Rules or provisions be applicable in case the company wants to approve annual financial statements in the Board meeting.

Answer:

The directors of the company may participate in a meeting of Board/Committee of directors under the Companies Act, 2013 through video conferencing or other audio visual mean. “Video conferencing or other audio visual means” means audio-visual electronic communication facility employed which enables all the persons participating in a meeting to communicate concurrently with each other without an intermediary and tc participate effectively in the meeting.

A director participating in a meeting through use of video conferencing shal be counted for the purpose of quorum. The minutes shall also disclose the particulars of the directors who attend the meeting through electronic mode. Therefore, to convene Board meeting, the director present in India shall ac as Chairman and shall be physically present in Mumbai.

According to Rule 4 of the following matters shall not be dealt with in any meeting held through video conferencing or other audio visual means:

  • the approval of the annual financial statements;
  • the approval of the Board’s report;
  • the approval of the prospectus;
  • the Audit Committee Meetings for 2 consideration of financial statement including consolidated financial statement if any, to be approved by the board under sub-section (1) of Section 134 of the Act; and
  • the approval of the matter relating to amalgamation, merger, demerger, acquisition and takeover.

Therefore, Annual financial statements cannot be approved in a meeting conducted through video conferencing.

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017

Second Proviso to Section 173(2)-

“Provided further that where there is quorum in a meeting through physical presence of directors, any other director -may participate through video conferencing or other audio visual means in such meeting on any matter specified under the first proviso.”

Question 13. Ram is a chartered accountant in practice. His proprietory concern has been appointed as the statutory auditor of a private limited company. Subsequently, it came to light that Mrs. Ram has been holding less than 1% shares of that private limited company. Examine the legal validity of the appointment of statutory auditor.

Answer:

Pursuant to Section 141, a person who himself, or his relative or partner is holding any security of or interest in the company or its subsidiary, or of its holding or associate company or a subsidiary of such holding company is not eligible for appointment of auditor of the company.

Provided that the relative may hold security or interest in the company of face value not exceeding 1,000 or such sum as may be prescribed.

As per Rule 10 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, a relative of an auditor may hold securities in the company of face value not exceeding * 1 lakh.

In accordance with provisions stated above, Mrs. Ram may hold shares of the value not exceeding 1 lakh to render Mr. Ram eligible for appointment as the auditor.

Since the question is silent on the value of the 1% shares of the company, the conclusion regarding the appointment of Ram may be drawn as under: If the holdings of Mrs. Ram exceed 1 lakh based on aforesaid provision of law Mr. Ram cannot be appointed as auditor.

However, if Mrs. Ram holding is less than 1 lakh Mr. Ram can be appointed as auditor.

Question 14. Ram is a practising Chartered Accountant and partner of two audit firms namely PYMG and YE. In the immediately preceding financial year, PYMG has completed its two terms of five consecutive years in Gayatri Pvt. Ltd. having paid-up share capital of 60 crore. Now Gayatri Pvt. Ltd. is considering appointing YE firm as its statutory auditors. Can Gayatri Pvt. Ltd. appoint YE firm as its auditors?

What will be your answer in the following cases?

  1. If appointing company is a one person company;
  2. If appointing company is a small company.

Answer:

Under section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 5 of Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, the following companies are required to appoint and rotate auditors:

  • All listed companies;
  • All unlisted public companies having paid up share capital of rupees ten crore or more;
  • All private limited companies having paid up share capital of rupees fifty crore or more;
  • All companies having paid up share capital of below threshold limit mentioned in (a) and (b) above, but having public borrowings from financial institutions, banks or public deposits of rupees fifty crores or more.
    • An individual auditor who has completed his term as auditor for more than one term of five consecutive years and an audit firm who has completed the term as auditor for more than two terms of five consecutive years shall not be re-appointed as an auditor of the company.
    • It is further provided that as on the date of appointment no audit firm having a common partner or partners to the other audit firm, whose tenure has expired in a company immediately preceding the financial year, shall be appointed as auditor of the same company for a period of five years.

Accordingly in the above case, the company is required to appoint and rotate the auditors on completion of the tenure. Thus Gayatri Ltd. cannot appoint YE audit firm as auditor of the company.

  • In case the appointee company is a One Person Company, rotation of auditor does not apply and hence the appointing company can appoint YE audit firm as auditor.
  • In case the appointee company is a Small Company, rotation of auditor does not apply and therefore the appointing company can appoint YE audit firm as auditor.

Question 15. Vijay is an auditor of XYZ Ltd. a listed public company having paid-up share capital of 10 crore. Advise him as to whether he can render the following services, keeping in mind, the relevant provisions of Companies Act, 2013?

  1. Vijay wants to conduct internal audit of XYZ Ltd. He also wishes to provide actuarial services to XYZ Ltd.
  2. Vijay wishes to “design and implement one financial system” and offer management services to ABC Ltd. the holding company of XYZ Ltd.
  3. What will be your answer in the above two cases if services are provided to PQR Ltd. a subsidiary company of XYZ Ltd.?

Answer:

Section 144 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that an auditor shall provide to the company only such other services as are approved by the Board of Directors/ the audit committee, but which shall not include any of the following services (whether such services are rendered directly or indirectly to the company or its holding company or subsidiary company, namely:

  • accounting and book keeping services;
  • internal audit;
  • design and implementation of any financial information system;
  • actuarial services;
  • investment advisory services;
  • investment banking services:
  • rendering of outsourced financial services;
  • management services; and
  • any other kind of services as may be prescribed.

Therefore based on the above mentioned provisions advice to Vijay will be as under:

  • Vijay cannot conduct internal audit of XYZ Ltd or carry out actuarial services to XYZ Ltd.
  • Vijay cannot provide management services or implementation of financial system to ABC Ltd as such services to the holding company is also not allowed.
  • Providing (i) and (ii) services above to PQR Ltd the subsidiary company of XYZ Ltd is also not allowed. Space to write important points for revision-

Question 16. Reels India Ltd. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wheels India Ltd. The auditor of Wheels India Ltd. has intimated the Board of directors that the company will not be required to prepare consolidated financial statements if provisions of section 129, Companies Act, 2013 are complied with. As a company secretary give your comments in this regard. 

Answer:

The consolidation of financial statements of the company shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Schedule III of the Act and the applicable accounting standards:

In case of a company covered under of Section 129(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 which is not required to prepare consolidated financial statements under the Accounting Standards, it shall be sufficient if the company complies with provisions on consolidated financial statements provided in Schedule III of the Act.

The contention of the Auditor is justifiable as Section 129 (3) of Companies Act, 2013 provides for not preparing the consolidated financial statement if conditions are fulfilled. Which according to second proviso to Rule 6 are as under:

Provided further that nothing in this rule shall apply in respect of preparation of consolidated financial statements by a company if it meets the following conditions:-

  • It is a wholly-owned subsidiary, or is a partially-owned subsidiary of another company and all its other members, including those not otherwise entitled to vote, having been intimated in writing and for which the proof of delivery of such intimation is available with the company, do not object to the company not presenting consolidated financial statements;
  • It is a company whose securities are not listed or are not in the process of listing on any stock exchange, whether in India or outside India; and
  • Its ultimate or any intermediate holding company files consolidated financial statements with the Registrar which are in compliance with the applicable Accounting Standards.

Question 17. ABC & Associates is an audit firm with partners A, B and C. The firm’s tenure as statutory auditor in M Ltd. has expired under Companies Act, 2013. M Ltd. is a listed company. XY & Co. another audit firm is appointed as auditor of M Ltd. for the subsequent year. B joins XY & Co. as partner, 4 months after it was appointed as statutory auditor of M Ltd. Comment with reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

According to Section 139(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that as on date of appointment of Auditors, no audit firm having a common partner or partners to the other audit firm whose tenure has expired in a company immediately preceding the financial year shall be appointed as auditor of the same company for a period of 5 years.

Now M Ltd is a listed entity and therefore rotational provisions are applicable. B is a partner in ABC & associates whose tenure as statutory auditor in M Ltd. has expired. He joined XY & Co. as partner 4 months after XY & Co. was appointed as statutory auditor of M Ltd..

It may be noted that there should not be a common partner in firms as on date of appointment. In the above case, B has joined XY & Co. after 4 months of its appointment as statutory auditor of M Ltd. Thus, XY &Co. can continue as statutory auditor of M Ltd for the remaining term after B joined them as Partner.

Question 18. In the course of business of the company, RST Logistics Ltd. received 2 lakh on 31st March, 2015 as advance towards consideration for providing future services in the form of warranty as per their agreement with Apurva. The period for providing such services in terms of common business practice is 3 years.

The amount is still lying as advance and while auditing the books of accounts for the year ended 31st March, 2019, the statutory auditor had commented about contravention of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in its preliminary findings to the Vice-President (Finance). Advise the Vice-President (Finance) if the comments of the auditor are justified in terms of provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

According to Rule 2(1) (xii) (e) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014. The term ‘deposit’ does not include any advance towards consideration for providing future services in the form of a warranty or maintenance contract as per written agreement or arrangement, if the period for providing such services does not exceed the period prevalent as per common business practice or five years, from the date of acceptance of such service whichever is less.

In the instant case, the amount of 2 lakhs received on March 31, 2015 as advance towards consideration for providing future services in the form of a warranty, is still lying with the company until March 31, 2019 and the period prevalent as per common business practice, for providing such service is 3 years, which has expired.

Accordingly, this amount has come within the ambit of the term ‘deposit’. Hence, the comments of the auditor are justified and the Vice-President (Finance) is advised to immediately refund the advance amount along with the due interest thereon to Apurva.

Question 19. Comment on the following:

Debapriya was appointed as alternate director of Julien in Amal Housing Finance Ltd. The company was served a demand notice by Goods & Service Tax department for 25 lakh for violation of certain provisions of GST law. Due to cash crunch the CEO approached Debapriya for a help of 12 lakh. Debapriya borrowed 7.50 lakh from his sister’s husband and gave to the company. The company recorded the same in its books of account.

Answer:

As per rule 2(1)(c) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 2014, provides that any amount received from a person who, at the time of receipt of the amount, was a director of the company shall not be regarded as deposit, if the director from whom money is received, furnishes to the company at the time of giving the money, a declaration in writing that the amount is not being given out of funds acquired by him by borrowing or accepting loans or deposits from others.

Although, proviso to Section. 73(1) read with Rule 1(3)(iii) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 2014 excludes a housing finance company registered with National Housing Bank established under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 from the provisions of Section 73 to 76A of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014.

Therefore, the transaction of accepting money from the director recorded by Amal Housing Finance Ltd. in its book of account is not considered as non-compliance of the provisions of the Companies Act.

Question 20. Advise whether the internal auditor is required to be appointed in the following scenarios:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Name of the Company

Can the following persons be appointed as internal auditor?

  1. President (HR)
  2. DGM (Finance)

Answer:

According to Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 13 of the Companies(Accounts) Rules, 2014, lay down the following class of companies which is required to appoint an internal auditor namely:

  • Every listed company;
  • Every unlisted public company having:
    • paid up share capital of 50 crore or more during the previous financial year; or
    • turnover of 200 crore or more during the previous financial year; or
    • Outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding 100 crore or more at any point of time during the previous financial year; or
    • Outstanding deposits of 25 crore or more at any point of time during the previous financial year; and
  • Every private company having-
    • Turnover of 200 crore or more during the previous financial year;
      or
    • Outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding 100 crore or more at any point of time during the previous financial year.

Accordingly, in the above case, solution is as under:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors An internal auditor

An internal auditor, shall either be a chartered accountant or a cost accountant, or such other professional as may be decided by the Board to conduct internal audit of the functions and activities of the company. The internal auditor may or may not be an employee of the company. Therefore, if President (HR) and DGM (Finance) satisfying the above criteria, can be appointed as internal Auditor.

Question 21. Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of a conglomerate is of the view that secretarial audit is mandatory for all the companies. He has approached you to determine whether secretarial audit is applicable in case of the following companies:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Chief Financial Officer

Answer:

Considering the increasing significance of Corporate Governance, Section 204 of the Companies Act, 2013 directive every listed company and such other class of prescribed companies to annex a Secretarial Audit Report, given by a Company Secretary in practice in Form MR-3 with its Board’s report.

As per rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, the lay down class of companies is as under:

  • every public company having a paid-up share capital of 50 Crore or more; or
  • every public company having a turnover of ₹250 crore or more; or
  • every company having outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions of 100 crore or more.

Secretarial Audit is also applicable to a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company, and which falls under the prescribed class of companies as indicated above.

Question 22. In light of the given case, applicability is specified in the table below:

Company Law Accounts, Audit And Auditors Applicability of Secretarial Audit

Answer the following with regard to appointment of auditor:

  1. X, a practising chartered accountant holds shares in ABC Ltd. The nominal value of shares is 50,000. Whether ABC Ltd. can appoint him as auditor?
  2. A, a practising chartered accountant has business relationship with XYZ Hotels Ltd. The hotel used to provide services to A frequently on the same price as charged from other customers. Whether XYZ Hotels Ltd appoint A as its auditor?
  3. X, a chartered accountant is working as a General Manager Accounts with ABC Ltd. Could X be appointed as auditor in ABC Ltd?

Answer:

  • According to Section 141(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that a person shall not be eligible for appointment as an auditor of a company when he himself or his relative or partner is holding any security of or interest in the company or its subsidiary, or of its holding or associate company or a subsidiary of such holding company. In the above problem Mr. X, a practicing Chartered Accountant holding shares in ABC Ltd cannot be appointed as Auditor of that company.
  • Section 141(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 10 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 provides that a person shall not be eligible for appointment as an auditor of a company when he has business relationship with the company, or its subsidiary, or its holding or associate company or subsidiary of such holding company or associate company.
  • The term business relationship shall be construed as any transaction entered into for a commercial purpose except –
    • commercial transactions which are in the nature of professional services permitted to be rendered by an auditor or audit firm under the Act and the Chartered Accountant Act, 1949 and the rules or the regulations made under those Act;
    • commercial transactions which are in the ordinary course of business of the company at arm’s length price like sale of products or services to the auditors, as customer, in the ordinary course of business, by companies engaged in the business of telecommunications, airlines, hospitals, hotels and such other similar businesses.
      As the transaction is at the arm length price so Mr. A can be appointed as an auditor of XYZ Hotels Ltd.
  • As per section 141(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that an officer or employee of the company is not eligible for appointment as an auditor of a company.

In the above case Mr. X, is working as a General Manager Accounts with ABC Ltd. so he cannot be appointed as Auditor of that company. Space to write important points for revision-

Short Notes

Question 1. Write short note on the following:

  1. National Finance Reporting Authority
  2. Consolidated Financial Statement

Answer:

National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)

Through Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government has introduced a new regulatory authority named as National Authority for Financial Reporting known as National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) with wide powers to recommend, enforce and monitor the compliance of accounting and auditing standards.

NFRA shall be responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance of auditing and accounting standards and for that purpose, oversee the quality of professions associated with ensuring such compliances. The Authority shall investigate professional and other misconducts which may be committed by Chartered Accountancy members and firms. T

he National Financial Reporting Authority shall be a quasijudicial body to regulate matters related to accounting and. auditing. With increasing demand of non-financial reporting, it may be referred to as a National level business Reporting Authority to regulate standards of all kind of reporting-financial as well as non-financial, by the companies in future.

National Financial Reporting Authority shall give its recommendations on accounting standards and auditing standards. It shall only recommend and it is the Central Government who shall prescribe such standards.

Objective

The objectives of National Financial Reporting Authority inter alia shall be as follows:

  • Make recommendations on formulation of accounting and auditing policies and standards for adoption by companies, class of companies or their auditors;
  • Monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards, monitor and enforce the compliance with auditing standards;
  • Oversee the quality of service of professionals associated with ensuring compliance with such standards and suggest measures required for improvement in quality of service, and
  • Perform such other functions as may be prescribed in relation to aforementioned objectives.

Consolidated Financial Statements

The Companies Act 2013 has made preparation of consolidated accounts mandatory for all companies including unlisted companies and private companies having one or more subsidiaries or associates or joint ventures.

According to sub Section 3 of the Section 129 of the Companies Act, 2013, where a company has one or more subsidiaries or associates companies, it shall, in addition to its financial statements for the financial year, prepare a consolidated financial statement of the company and of all the subsidiaries and associates companies in the same form and manner as that of its own which shall also be laid before the annual general meeting of the company along with the laying of its financial statement under sub Section 2.

The company shall also attach along with its financial statement, a separate statement containing the salient features of the Financial Statement of its subsidiary/ies or associate/s or joint venture/s in Form AOC-1 (Rule 5).

Manner of Consolidation of Accounts

The consolidation of financial statements of the company shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Schedule III of the Act and the applicable accounting standards:

Provided that in case of a company covered under sub-Section (3) of Section 129 which is not required to prepare consolidated financial statements under the Accounting Standards, it shall be sufficient if the company complies with provisions on consolidated financial statements provided in Schedule III of the Act.

Question 2. Write short note on Secretarial Audit.

Answer:

Secretarial Audit:

Secretarial Audit is a compliance audit and it is a part of total compliance management in an organisation. The Secretarial Audit is an effective tool for corporate compliance management. It helps to detect non-compliance and to take corrective measures.

Secretarial Audit is an independent, objective assurance intended to add value and improve an organisation’s operations. It helps to accomplish the organisation’s objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.

As per Rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, the prescribed class of companies is as under:

  • every public company having a paid-up share capital of fifty crore rupees or more; or
  • every public company having a turnover of two hundred fifty crore rupees or more.

As per Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Amendment Rule, 2020

  • with this insertion in Rule 9(1) of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, now every company having outstanding loans or borrowing from banks or public financial institutions of one hundred crore rupees or more is also required to annex the Secretarial Audit report with its Boards Report.
  • MCA has also clarified that for the purpose of this rule paid up share capital, turnover, or outstanding loans or borrowings as the case may be, existing on the last date of latest audited financial statement shall be taken into account.

It shall be the duty of the company to give all assistance and facilities to the company secretary in practice for auditing the secretarial and related records of the company.

Secretarial Audit is also applicable to a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company, and which falls under the prescribed class of companies as indicated above.

Descriptive Questions

Question 3. What is the procedure of report fraud.

Answer:

Reporting of Frauds by Auditor-Section 143(12) to 143 (15) and Rule 13 Section 143(12) and Rule 13 provides that If an auditor of a company, in the course of the performance of his duties as statutory auditor, has reason to believe that an offence of fraud, which involves or is expected to involve individually an amount of rupees one crore or above, is being or has been committed against the company by its officers or employees, the auditor shall report the matter to Central Government.

  • The auditor shall report the matter to the Central Government as under:-
    • the auditor shall report the matter to the Board or the Audit Committee, immediately but not later than two days of his knowledge of the fraud, seeking their reply or observations within forty-five days;
    • on receipt of such reply or observations, the auditor shall forward his report and the reply or observations of the Board or the Audit Committee along with his comments (on such reply or observations of the Board or the Audit Committee) to the Central Government within fifteen days from the date of receipt of such reply or observations;
    • in case the auditor fails to get any reply or observations from the Board or the Audit Committee within forty-five days, he shall forward. his report to the Central Government along with a note containing the details of his report that was earlier forwarded to the Board or the Audit Committee for which he has not received any reply or observations;
  • The report shall be sent to the Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs in a sealed cover by Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due or by Speed Post followed by an e-mail in confirmation of the same.
  • The report shall be on the letter-head of the auditor containing postal address, e-mail address and contact telephone number or mobile number and be signed by the auditor with his seal and shall indicate his Membership Number.
  • The report shall be in the Form ADT-4.
  • In case of a fraud involving lesser than the amount specified above, the auditor shall report the matter to Audit Committee or to the Board immediately but not later than two days of his knowledge of the fraud and he shall report the matter specifying the following:
    • Nature of Fraud with description;
    • Approximate amount involved; and
    • Parties involved.
  • The fraud reported to the Audit Committee or the Board during the year shall be disclosed in the Board’s Report specifying the following-
    • Nature of Fraud with description;
    • Approximate Amount involved;
    • Parties involved, if remedial action not taken; and
    • Remedial actions taken.
  • The provision of this rule shall also apply, mutatis mutandis, to a Cost Auditor and a Secretarial Auditor during the performance of his duties under Section 148 and 204 respectively.
    Note: The following details of each of the fraud reported to the Audit Committee or the Board under sub-rule (3) during the year shall be disclosed in the Board’s Report:

    • Nature of Fraud with description;
    • Approximate Amount involved;
    • Parities involved, if remedial action not taken; and
    • Remedial action taken.

Question 4. ABC Ltd. wants to appoint FMC and Associates as its internal auditor. What are the conditions of such appointment?

Answer:

Internal Audit:

Classes of companies requiring Internal Audit

The following class of companies shall be required to appoint an internal auditor or a firm of internal auditors:-

  • Every listed company;
  • Every unlisted public company having-
    • Paid up share capital of fifty crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
    • Turnover of two hundred crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
    • Outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding one hundred crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year; or
    • Outstanding deposits of twenty five crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year; and
  • Every private company having-
    • Turnover of two hundred crore rupees or more during the preceding financial year; or
    • Outstanding loans or borrowings from banks or public financial institutions exceeding one hundred crore rupees or more at any point of time during the preceding financial year.

The Audit Committee of the company or the Board shall, in consultation with the Internal Auditor, formulate the scope, functioning, periodicity and methodology for conducting the internal audit.

The board may appoint any practicing Chartered Accountant or a Cost Accountant or any other person whom it deems fit to be appointed as its internal auditor. For this purpose, company board may consider the nature and volume of business of company; qualifications, experience and capabilities of such person being appointed as auditor and scope of internal audit.

Who can be an Internal Auditor

  • A Chartered Accountant or;
  • A Cost Accountant or;
  • Such other professional as may be decided by the Board to conduct internal audit of the functions and activities of the Company.

For this sub-section, Chartered Accountant means a Chartered Accountant, who is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and has a valid certificate of practice and Cost Accountant means a member of The Institute of Cost Accountants of India. Other professionals, as may be decided by the company’s board, may also be appointed as an internal auditor.

CS Company Law Paper – Corporate Social Responsibility Question and Answers

Corporate Social Responsibility

Meaning of CSR

Corporate Social Responsibility is an important business strategy because, to some extent a consumer wants to buy products from companies he trusts, a supplier wants to form business partnership with companies he can rely on, an employee want to work for a company he respects, other concerns want to establish business contacts with companies seeking feasible solutions and innovations in areas of common concern.

CSR Applicability

As per Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, the CSR provision is applicable to companies which fulfills any of the following criteria during the immediately preceding financial year:

  • Companies having net worth of rupees five hundred crore or more, or
  • Companies having turnover of rupees one thousand crore or more or
  • Companies having a net profit of rupees five crore or more

Functions of CSR Committee

  • To formulate and recommend to the Board, a CSR Policy which would indicate the activities to be undertaken in areas or subject, specified in Schedule VII of the Act.
  • To recommend the amount of the expenditure to be incurred on the activities undertaken in pursuance of the CSR policy.
  • To institute a transparent monitoring mechanism for implementation of the CSR projects or programs or activities undertaken by the company.
  • To monitor the CSR policy of the company time to time.

List of CSR Activities

  • eradicating hunger, poverty and malnutrition, promoting health care including preventive health care and sanitation including contribution to the Swach Bharat Kosh set-up by the Central Government for the promotion of sanitation and making available safe drinking water.
  • promoting education, including special education and employment enhancing vocation skills especially among children, women, elderly and the differently abled and livelihood enhancement projects.
  • promoting gender equality, empowering women, setting up homes and hostels for women and orphans; setting up old age homes, day care centres and such other facilities for senior citizens and measures for reducing inequalities faced by socially and economically backward groups;
  • protection of national heritage, art and culture including restoration of buildings and sites of historical importance and works of art; setting up public libraries; promotion and development of traditional arts and handicrafts;
  • measures for the benefit of armed forces veteran, war widows and their dependents;
  • training to promote rural sports, nationally recognized sports, para Olympic sports and Olympic sports;
  • rural development projects.

CSR Expenditure

  • The Board of every company shall ensure that the company spends, in every financial year, at least two per cent of the average net profits of the company made during the three immediately preceding financial years, in pursuance of its Corporate Social Responsibility Policy. This amount will be CSR expenditure.
  • If the company fails to spend such amount, the Board shall, in its report specify the reasons for riot spending the amount.
  • The company shall give preference to the local area and areas around it where it operates, for spending the amount earmarked for Corporate Social Responsibility activities.
  • Expenditure incurred on specified activities that are carried out in India only will qualify as CSR expenditure. Such expenditure includes contribution to the corpus or on projects or programs relating to CSR activities.
  • Any surplus arising out of CSR activities will not be considered as business profit for the spending company.

Computation of Net Profit

“Net profit” as per explanation of Section 135(5) means that net profit shall not include such sums as may be prescribed, and shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 198. The net worth, turnover and net profits are to be computed in terms of Section 198 of the 2013 Act as per the profit and loss statement prepared by the company in terms of Section 381 (1) (a) and Section 198 of the 2013 Act.

Every company will have to report its standalone net profit during a financial year for the purpose of determining whether or not it triggers the threshold criteria as prescribed under Section 135(1) of the Companies Act.

 Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Requirements

It is mandatory for companies to disclose in Board’s Report, an annual report on CSR. The report of the Board of Directors attached to the financial statements of the Company would also need to include an annual report on the CSR activities of the company in the format prescribed containing following particulars –

  • A brief outline of the company’s CSR policy, including overview of projects or programs proposed to be undertaken and a reference to the web-link to the CSR policy and projects or programs.
  • The Composition of the CSR Committee.
  • Average net profit of the company for last three financial years
  • Prescribed CSR Expenditure
  • Details of CSR spent during the financial year.
  • In case the company has failed to spend the two per cent of the average net profit of the last three financial years or any part thereof, the company shall provide the reasons for not spending the amount in its Board report.

Paper Corporate Social Responsibility

 Corporate Social Responsibility Descriptive Questions

Question 1. The Companies Act, 2013 has introduced several provisions which would change the way Indian corporates do business and one such provision is spending on corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities which has assumed considerable importance. Discuss the provisions governing CSR as provided in the Companies Act, 2013 and rules made thereunder.

Answer:

The provisions of Corporate Social Responsibility are dealt under Section 135 read with the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 and clarifications issued by the Ministry from time to time. Some of the important provisions are as under:

  • As per Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, every company having net worth of 500 crores or more, or turnover of 1,000 crores or more or a net profit of 5 crores or more during the immediately preceding financial year shall constitute a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the Board consisting of three or more directors out of which at least one director shall be an independent director. There need not be any independent director on the CSR Committee if the Company is unlisted Public Company or a Private Company.
  • In case of Private Company CSR Committee can be formed with two members.
  • CSR Committee shall formulate and recommend Corporate Social Responsibility Policy which shall indicate the activity or activities to be undertaken by the company as specified in Schedule VII and also recommend the amount of expenditure to be incurred on CSR activities. The Board of every company shall ensure that the company spends in every financial year at least 2% of the average net profit of the company made during the three immediately preceding financial years in pursuance of its CSR policy.
  • Net Profit of a company for the purposes of Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 does not include the profit arising from any overseas branch of the company and the dividends received from other companies in India which are complying with Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013.
  • The company shall give preference to local areas where it operates, for spending amount earmarked for CSR activities.
  • The CSR activities shall be undertaken by the company, as per its stated CSR Policy, as projects or programs or activities (either new or ongoing), excluding activities undertaken in pursuance of its normal course of business.
  • The Board of a company may decide to undertake its CSR activities approved by the CSR committee, through a registered trust or a registered society or a company established by the company or its holding or subsidiary or associate company under section 8 of the Act or otherwise.
  • The CSR projects or programs or activities undertaken in India only shall amount to CSR expenditure.
  • The CSR projects or programs or activities that benefit only the employees of the company and their families shall not be considered as CSR activities in accordance with Section 135 of the Act.
  • Contribution of any amount directly or indirectly to any political party under section 182 of the Act, shall not be considered as CSR activity.
  • The CSR Policy of the company is required to be displayed on Company’s website.
  • The term CSR is not defined under the Act but Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013 requires that the CSR policy created by the CSR Committee must involve atleast one of the focus areas as mentioned in that schedule.
  • The CSR activities should be according to the stated CSR policy, as projects or programs or activities (either new or ongoing). The CSR activities may be decided by the Board to be undertaken through a registered trust or a registered society or a company established by the company or its holding or subsidiary or associate company, provided that:
    • if such trust, society or company is not established by the company or its holding or subsidiary or associate company, it shall have an established track record of three years in undertaking similar programs or projects;
    • the company has specified the project or programs to be undertaken through these entities, the modalities of utilization of funds on such projects and programs and the monitoring and reporting mechanism.
  • A company may also collaborate with other company but the reports of such projects shall be separately made as per the rules.
  • CSR projects or programs or activities undertaken in India shall amount to CSR expenditure.
  • CSR projects that benefits only the families of the employees shall not be considered as CSR activities.
  • Companies can either conduct CSR activities by mobilizing their own personnel or through institutions having a track record of at least three years but such expenditure must exceed 5% of total CSR expenditure in one financial year.
  • Contribution made to the any political party shall not be considered as CSR activity.

Question 2. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to ‘corporate social responsibility’ (CSR), answer the following:

  1. Which activities would not qualify as CSR?
  2. Whether the average net profit criteria for CSR is before tax or after tax?

Answer:

Company Law Corporate Social Responsibility Activities which would not be classifies

Question 3. Any expenditure incurred for the benefit of the society will be considered as expenditure in pursuance of corporate social responsibility policy. Comment with reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

As per Section 135 of Companies Act, 2013 provides that a company falling under specified criteria shall put in place a Corporate Social Responsibility Policy specify the activities to be undertaken by the company in areas or subject, specified in Schedule VII of Companies Act, 2013.

It is further provided that the Board of Directors of every company shall make sure that the activities as are included in Corporate Social Responsibility Policy of the company are accept by the company.

The expenditure incurred for the benefit of society shall be considered as expenditure in pursuance to Section 135 of Companies Act, 2013, only if the same falls under Corporate Social Responsibility Policy of the Company.

Logical Solutions Ltd., a listed company, is having a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) committee constituted with the following members:

Rohan-Whole-time director and Chairman of CSR committee and Board

Sohan-Non-executive director

Mohan-Independent director

Question 4. Can company constitute a Nomination and Remuneration committee consisting of same three members of CSR committee with same composition? Discuss.

Answer:

Under section 178 of Companies Act, 2013, the Board of Directors of every listed public company shall constitute the Nomination and Remuneration Committee consisting of three or more non-executive directors out of which not less than one-half shall be independent director.

The Chairperson of the company (whether executive or non-executive) may be appointed as a member of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee but shall not chair such Committee.

In the above case the CSR Committee cannot serve as Nomination and Remuneration committee as the composition is different.

Question 5. Explain whether the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee is entrusted with any specific functions under the Companies Act, 2013?

Answer:

Section 135 (3) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rules made thereunder provides that the following functions shall be carried out by a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee:

  • To formulate and recommend to the Board. a CSR Policy which would indicate the activities to be undertaken in areas or subject, specified in Schedule VII of the Act.
  • To recommend the amount of the expenditure to be incurred on the activities undertaken in pursuance of the CSR policy.
  • To institute a transparent monitoring mechanism for implementation of the CSR projects or programs or activities undertaken by the company.
  • To monitor the CSR policy of the company time to time.

Question 6. DEF Traders Ltd. is incorporated as a small company. State with reference to the relevant legal provisions whether it is required to set up a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee?

Answer:

According to Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, only the following companies are required to constitute a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee which in the immediately preceding financial year have:

  • Net worth of 500 crore or more; or
  • Turnover of 1000 crore or more; or
  • Net profit of 5 crore or more

A small company is defined in section 2(85) of the Companies Act, 2013 to mean a company, other than a public company whose:

  • Paid up share capital does not exceed 50 Lakh or such higher amount as may be prescribed which shall not be more than 10 crore and
  • Turnover of which as per profit and loss account for the immediately preceding financial year does not exceed 2 crore or such higher amount as may be prescribed which shall not be more than 100 crore

As DEF Traders Ltd. is incorporated as small company, it does not meet the criteria specified in section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 and would, therefore not be required to constitute a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee.

Corporate Social Responsibility Practical Questions

Question 1. Brave Ltd. is listed at Bombay Stock Exchange and has a net worth of over 600 crore. The company has constituted a corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee with Jay and Vijay as its members. Both Jay and Vijay are directors of the company, Jay being an independent director.

Explaining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to ‘corporate social responsibility’, examine whether the company has complied with the provisions of the Act in this regard.

Answer:

Company Law Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Social Responsibility

Note: Since the company in question has a net worth of 600 crore which is more than the required sum of 500 crore, the company has to comply with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, presently, company has only two directors, accordingly there is a need to reconstitute the CSR Committee of Brave Ltd.

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 Revised Section 135(1)-

“Every company having net worth of rupees five hundred crore or more, or turnover of rupees one thousand crore or more or a net profit of rupees five crore or more during the immediately preceding financial year shall constitute a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the Board consisting of three or more directors, out of which at least one director shall be an independent director.

Provided that where a company is not required to appoint an independent director under sub-section (4) of Section 149, it shall have in its Corporate Social Responsibility Committee two or more directors.”

Revised Section 135(3)(a)-

“(a) formulate and recommend to the Board, a Corporate Social Responsibility Policy which shall indicate the activities to be undertaken by the company in areas or subject, specified in Schedule VII.”

Revised Explanation to Section 135(5)

“For the purposes of this section “net profit” shall not include such sums as may be prescribed, and shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 198.”

Question 2. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) provisions are applicable to Microskill Ltd. The company finalised the project under its CSR initiatives which require funds beyond the mandated 2% of average net profit of the company for last three financial years. Will such excess expense, when incurred, be counted in subsequent financial years as a part of CSR expenditure? Advise.

Answer:

In terms of Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, the Board of every company to which Section 135 is applicable shall ensure that the company spends in every financial year, at least 2% of the average net profits or where the company has not completed the period of three financial years since its incorporation, during such immediately preceding financial years, in pursuance of its Corporate Social Responsibility Policy.

Provided that the company shall give preference to the local area and areas around it where it operates, for spending the amount earmarked for Corporate Social Responsibility activities.

Provided further that if the company fails to spend such amount, the Board shall, in its report made under clause (o) of sub-section (3) of section 134, is required to specify the reasons for not spending the amount and, unless the unspent amount relates to any ongoing project referred to in section 135(6), transfer such unspent amount to a Fund specified in Schedule VII, within a period of six months of the expiry of the financial year.

There is no provision for carry forward or excess expenditure to the next year(s). The words used in the section are ‘at least’. Therefore, any expenditure over 2% could be considered as “voluntary higher spending”.

Fortune Ltd. had below financial details during the last three financial years:

Company Law Corporate Social Responsibility Three Financial Year

Question 3. Discuss the compliance requirements for the Company on Corporate Social Responsibility. Whether Company requires to spend amount on CSR Activities, and what are the consequences if the Company fails to spend any amount?

Answer:

Section 135(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that every company having net worth of rupees five hundred crore or more, or turnover of rupees one thousand crore or more or a net profit of rupees five crore or more during the immediately preceding financial year shall constitute a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the Board consisting of three or more directors, out of which at least one director shall be an independent director.

Section 135(3) requires that the Committee shall formulate and recommend to the Board, a CSR Policy which shall indicate the activities to be undertaken by the company as specified in Schedule VII. The Committee shall further recommend the amount of expenditure to be incurred on CSR activities and monitor the Policy from time to time.

As per Section 135(5) of the Act, the Board shall ensure that the company spends, in every financial year, at least 2% of the average net profits of the company made during the three immediately preceding financial years, in pursuance of its CSR Policy.

In Section 135 of the principal Act,

  • in sub-section (5),-
    • after the words “three immediately preceding financial years,”, the words “or where the company has not completed the period of three financial years since its incorporation, during such immediately preceding financial years,” shall be inserted;
    • in the second proviso, after the words “reasons for not spending the amount” occurring at the end, the words, brackets, figure and letters “and, unless the unspent amount relates to any ongoing project referred to in sub-section (6), transfer such unspent amount to a Fund specified in Schedule VII, within a period of six months of the expiry of the financial year”.

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020

in sub-section (5), after the second proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-

“Provided also that if the company spends an amount in excess of the requirements provided under this sub-section, such company may set off such excess amount against the requirement to spend under this sub-section for such number of succeeding financial years and in such manner, as may be prescribed.”;

As Per Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019:

After sub-Section (5), the following sub-Sections shall be inserted, namely:

  • “Any amount remaining unspent under sub-Section (5), pursuant to any ongoing project, fulfilling such conditions as may be prescribed, undertaken by a company in persuance of its Corporate Social Responsibility Policy, shall be transferred by the company within a period of thirty days from the end of the financial year to a special account to be opened by the company in that behalf for that financial year in any scheduled bank to be called the Unspent Corporate Social Responsibility.
  • Account, and such amount shall be spent by the company in pursuance of its obligation towards the Corporate Social Responsibility Policy within a period of three financial years from the date of such transfer, failing which, the company shall transfer the same to a Fund specified in Schedule VII, within a period of thirty days from the date of completion of the third financial year.
  • If a company contravenes the provisions of sub-Section (5) or sub- Section (6), the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to twenty-five lakh rupees and every officer of such company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees, or with both.
  • The Central Government may give such general or special directions to a company or class of companies as it considers necessary to ensure compliance of provisions of this Section and such company or class of companies shall comply with such directions.”
  • Accordingly, Fortune Ltd. whose net profits during the current year exceeds rupees five crore is required to comply with the requirements of Section 135 and form a CSR Committee as explained above and spend an amount of rupees eight lakh (being 2% of the average net profits of rupees four crore).
  • However, the company shall seek to give preference to the local area and areas around it where it operates for spending the aforesaid amount. However, if Fortune Ltd. fails to spend such amount, the Board shall, in its report made u/s 134(3)(0), specify the reasons for not spending the amount. Space to write important points for revision

Question 4. From the following information in respect of two companies viz. ZYX Limited and CBA Private Limited, compute the amount the companies are required to spend on account of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR):

Company Law Corporate Social Responsibility Financial Year

Answer:

Section 135(1) read with Section 135(5) of the Companies Act; 2013 provides that every company having net worth of rupees 500 crore or more, or turnover of rupees 1,000 crore or more or a net profit or rupees 5 crore or more during any financial year shall ensure that the company spends, in every financial year, at least 2% of the average net profits of the company made during the three immediately, preceding financial years.

As Per Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019:

After sub-Section (5), the following sub-Sections shall be inserted, namely:

  • “Any amount remaining unspent under sub-Section (5), pursuant to any ongoing project, fulfilling such conditions as may be prescribed, undertaken by a company in persuance of its Corporate Social Responsibility Policy, shall be transferred by the company within a period of thirty days from the end of the financial year to a special account to be opened by the company in that behalf for that financial year in any scheduled bank to be called the Unspent Corporate Social Responsibility.
  • Account, and such amount shall be spent by the company in pursuance of its obligation towards the Corporate Social Responsibility Policy within a period of three financial years from the date of such transfer, failing which, the company shall transfer from the date of completion of the third financial year. the same to a Fund specified in Schedule VII, within a period of thirty days
  • The Central Government may give such general or special directions to a company or class of companies as it considers necessary to ensure compliance of provisions of this Section and such company or class of companies shall comply with such directions.”
  • Where the amount to be spent by a company under sub-section (5) does not exceed fifty lakh rupees, the requirement under sub-section (1) for constitution of the Corporate Social Responsibility Committee shall not be applicable and the functions of such Committee provided under this section shall, in such cases, be discharged by the Board of Directors of such company.”
  • In the given case, in case of ZYX Limited, the net profit for financial year 2016-17 is 18 crore. The average net profit for preceding 3 financial years is (0+6+18) crore/3=24 crore/3=8 crore. It is to be noted that though the company was not incorporated in the financial year 2014-15, yet that year is to be considered for calculation of average net profit. Accordingly, the company has to spend 2% of 8 crore, i.e., 0.16 crore towards CSR activities.
  • In case of CBA Private Limited, the net profit for financial year 2016-17 is 6 crore. The average net profit for preceding 3 financial year is * [(-4)+ (-1)+6] crore/3=1 crore/3 33.33 lakh. It is to be observed that though the company suffered losses in 2 years 2014-15 and 2015-16, yet those 2 years are to be considered for calculation of average net profit. Accordingly, the company has to spend 2% of 33.33 lakh, i.e., 0.67 lakh towards CSR activities.

Question 5. RS Ltd. has incurred 5 lakh for the fulfillment of Labour Law, Land Acquisition Act and Food Safety and Standards Act in the month of May, 2018. The company has accounted for this 5 lakh as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure. Explaining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 discuss whether the company has rightly accounted for the amount in CSR.

Answer:

According to the Provisions of Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 and rules and clarifications thereunder, expenses incurred by companies for the fulfillment of any Act/Statute of regulations (such as Labour Laws, Land Acquisition Act etc.) would not count as CSR expenditure under the Companies Act, 2013.

In accordance with the aforementioned clarification, expenditure of * 5 lacs relating to fulfillment of requirement under Labour Law, Land Acquisition Act and Food Safety and Standard Act by RS Ltd., will not be treated as CSR expenditure.

Question 6. XYZ Ltd. is carrying out a project under its CSR initiatives. Some of its employees are working in this project. The company want to monetize and account it under the head of ‘CSR expenditure’? Advice the company.

Answer:

As per the MCA General Circular No. 01/2016 dated 12th January, 2016, the contribution and involvement of employees in CSR activities of the company will no doubt generate interest/pride in CSR work and promote transformation from Corporate Social Responsibility as an obligation, to Socially Responsible Corporate in all aspects of their functioning. Therefore, should be encouraged to involve their employees in CSR activities. Although, monetization of such services of employees would not be counted towards CSR expenditure.

CS Executive Program Company Law Paper Chapter 1 Company Law Introduction

Chapter 1 Introduction

Company

A company is an association of both natural and artificial persons incorporated under the existing law of a country. A company has a separate legal entity from the persons constituting it.

Characteristics of a company

The main characteristics of a company are corporate personality, limited liability, perpetual succession, separate property, transferability of shares, common seal, capacity to sue and be sued, contractual rights, limitation of action, separate management, termination of existence etc.

Compared to other types of business associations

As compared to other types of business associations, an incorporated company has the advantage of corporate personality, limited liability, perpetual succession, transferable shares, separate property, capacity to sue, flexibility and autonomy.

Disadvantages and inconveniences in incorporation

There are, however, certain disadvantages and inconveniences in incorporation. Some of these disadvantages are formalities and expenses, corporate disclosures, separation of control from ownership, greater social responsibility, greater tax burden in certain cases, cumbersome winding-up procedure.

CS Executive Program Company Law Paper Chapter 1 Company Law Introduction

Doctrine of lifting of or piercing the corporate veil

  • Sometime veil of corporate personality is used for some dishonest and fraudulent purpose in that case NCLT will look into reality and remove the corporate veil.
    • In the following case the Tribunal have lifted the corporate veil.
    • Prevention of fraud and misconduct [Gilford Motor Co. Vs. Horne [1933] Ch 935]
    • The company is in reality an agency or trust for someone else [Re. F G Films Ltd. (1953) 1 All E.R. 615]
    • Protection of public policy [Connors Vs. Connors Ltd. (1940) 4 All E.R. 179]
    • Enemy character of company [Daimler Co. Ltd. Vs. Continental Tyre and Rubber Co. (1916) 2 A.C. 307]
    • To protect labour welfare legislation [Workmen of Associated Rubber Industries Ltd. Vs. Associated Rubber Industries Ltd. A.I.R. 1986 SC 1]
    • Use of corporate veil for hiding criminal activities.
    • To punish for contempt of Court [Jyoti Limited Vs. Kanwaljit Kavr Bhasin 32] (1987) DLT 198]
  • Where a fraudulent and dishonest use is made of the legal entity, the individuals concerned will not be allowed to take shelter behind the corporate personality.
  • The NCLT will break through the corporate shell and apply the principle/doctrine of what is called as “lifting of or piercing the corporate veil”.

LLP

It is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability of a company and the flexibility of a partnership. LLP can continue its existence irrespective of changes in partners.

It is capable of entering into contracts and holding property in its own name. LLP is a separate legal entity, and is liable to the full extent of its assets but liability of the partners is limited to their agreed contribution in the LLP.

Corporation

An organization formed under state law for the purpose of carrying on a business enterprise in such a manner as to make the enterprise distinct from its owners.

Illegal association

As per Section 464 of Companies Act, no association or partnership consisting of more than such number of persons as may be prescribed shall be formed for the purpose of carrying on any business that has for its object the acquisition of gain by the association or partnership or by the individual members thereof, unless it is registered as a company under this Act or is formed under any other law for the time being in force. The number of persons which may be prescribed under this section shall not exceed 100. Rule 10 of Companies (Miscellaneous) Rules, 2014 prescribes 50 persons in this regard.

Effects of an illegal association: An illegal association:

  • Cannot enter into any contract.
  • Cannot sue any member, or outsider, not even if the company is subsequently registered.
  • Cannot be sued by a member, or an outsider for recovery of any debts.
  • Cannot be wound up by an order of the Tribunal. In fact, the Tribunal cannot entertain a petition for winding up as an unregistered company, for if it did, it would be indirectly according recognition to the illegal association. [Raghubar Dayal Vs. Sarafa Chamber A.I.R. 1954 All. 555]

However, an illegal association is liable to be taxed. [Kumara Swamy Chattiar Vs. Income Tax Officer (1957) I.T.R. 457].

Company as a Citizen

The company, though a legal person, is not a citizen under the Citizenship Act, 1955 or under the Constitution of India.

In State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. CTO AIR 1963 SC 1811, the Supreme Court held that the State Trading Corporation though a legal person, was not a citizen and can act only through natural persons.

Nationality & Residence

Though it is established through judicial decisions that a company cannot be a citizen, yet it has nationality, domicile and residence.

In Gasque Vs. Inland Revenue Commissioners (1940) 2 K.B. 88, it was held that a limited company is capable of having a domicile and its domicile is the place of its registration and that domicile clings to it throughout its existence.

Short Notes

Question 1. Write a note on the following: (5) Illegal association.

Answer:

Illegal Association:

Company Law Introduction Illegal Association

Distinguish Between

Question  1. Distinguish between the following:

(a) ‘Company’ and ‘partnership firm’.

Answer:

Company Law Introduction Company And Partner Firm

Question  2. Distinguish between the following:

(c) ‘Limited liability Partnership’ and ‘body corporate’.

Answer:

Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) and Body Corporate

Company Law Introduction Limited Liability Partnership and Body Corporate

Question  3. Distinguish between the following:

(a) ‘Company’ and ‘limited liability partnership’.

Answer:

Company Law Introduction Company And Limited Liability

Descriptive Questions

Question 1. Comment on the following:

(2) A shareholder who holds 99% of the share capital of a company can be held liable for the acts of the company.

Answer:

Company Law Introduction Liable for the acts of the company

Question 2. Comment on the following:

(b) A shareholder is held personally liable for the acts of the company, if he holds virtually the entire share capital of the company.

(d) Common seal acts as the official signature of a company.

Answer:

Company Law Introduction Authenticity of the statement

Question  3. Comment on the following:

(b) Common seal can be used by any employee of the company irrespective of his designation.

Answer:

Company Law Introduction Authenticity of the Statement 1

Amendment Made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015

Company Law Introduction Amendment made by companies

Question 4. Answer the following citing the relevant provisions of law/case law, if any:

“Separate personality of a company is a special privilege. In case of dishonest or fraudulent use of this privilege, corporate veil can be lifted”. Discuss.

Answer:

Doctrine of lifting of or piercing the corporate veil:

Company Law Introduction Doctrine of lifting of or piercing the corporate veil

In the following cases the Tribunal have lifted the corporate veil.

Company Law Introduction Tribunal have lifted the corporate veil

Question 5. In an annual general meeting of Amar (Pvt.) Ltd., all the shareholders were killed in a bomb blast. State, whether the company is still in existence. If so, how?

Answer:

 

Company Law Introduction Perpetual Succession

Question 6. Comment on the following:

(a) A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, being an artificial person, is not entitled to sue a natural person or to sue another company incorporated under the same Act.

(d) A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 never dies except when it is wound-up as per the law.

Answer:

Company Law Introduction Companies Act 2013

However in case of merger, the transferor company is dissolved without winding up.

Question 7. Explain clearly the meaning of ‘lifting of corporate veil’ in relation to a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013. Examining the judicial decisions, state whether ‘corporate veil’ can be lifted in the following cases:

Where the corporate veil has been used for improper conduct; and

Where the acts of a company are opposed to workmen?

Answer:

Company Law Introduction Lifting of Corporate Veil

Question 8. Comment on the following:

Three companies incorporated with the same set of shareholders are treated as same companies under the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

Company Law Introduction Separate Legal Entity

Question 9. One of the subscribers to Memorandum of Association of a company under process of incorporation is a foreign national residing outside India. State the provisions of Companies Act, 2013 regarding authentication of his signature and address. Will the requirement of business visa be applicable to his case if he is a person of Indian origin or overseas citizen of India?

Answer:

Where subscriber to the memorandum is a foreign national residing outside India:

  • in a country in any part of the Commonwealth, his signatures and address on the memorandum and articles of association and proof of identity shall be notarized by a Notary (Public) in that part of the Commonwealth.
  • in a country which is a party to the Hague Apostille Convention, 1961, his signatures and address on the memorandum and articles of association and proof of identity shall be notarized before the Notary (Public) of the country of his origin and be duly apostillised in accordance with the said Hague Convention.
  • in a country outside the Commonwealth and which is not a party to the Hague Apostille Convention, 1961, his signatures and address on the memorandum and articles of association and proof of identity, shall be notarized before the Notary (Public) of such country and the certificate of the Notary (Public) shall be authenticated by a Diplomatic or Consular Officer empowered in this behalf under Section 3 of the Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oaths and Fees) Act, 1948 (40 of 1948) or, where there is no such officer by any of the officials mentioned in Section 6 of the Commissioners of Oaths Act, 1889 (52 and 53 Vic.C.10), or in any Act amending the same;
  • visited in India and intended to incorporate a company, in such case the incorporation shall be allowed if, he/she is having a valid Business Visa.

Explanation: For the purposes of this clause, it is hereby clarified that, in case of Person is of Indian Origin or Overseas Citizen of India, requirement of business Visa shall not be applicable.

Question 10. Comment on the following:

(a) The Companies Act, 2013 does not provide statutory recognition to the doctrine of lifting of corporate veil. Only judicial interpretations disregard the concept of separate personality.

Answer:

It is not correct to State that the Companies Act, 2013 does not provide statutory recognition to the doctrine of lifting of corporate veil and only judicial interpretation disregard the concept of separate personality.

The Companies Act, 2013 itself contains various provisions in Sections 7(7), 251(1) and 339 which lift the corporate veil to reach the real forces of action. Section 7(7) of Companies Act, 2013 deals with punishment for incorporation of company by furnishing incorrect information; Section 251(1) of Companies Act, 2013 provides that liability for making fraudulent application for removal of name of company from the register of companies and Section 339 of Companies Act, 2013 deals with liability for fraudulent conduct of business during the course of winding up.

Ever behind the decision in Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd., generally Courts are reluctant or at least very cautious to lift the veil of corporate personality to see the real persons behind it. Nevertheless, Courts have found it necessary to disregard the separate personality of a company in the different situations:

  • Fraud or Improper conduct: Where the corporate veil has been used for commission of fraud or improper conduct. In this case, Courts have lifted the veil and looked at the realities of the situation. (Case Law:Jones vs. Lipman)
  • Company acting as an agent: Where a corporate facade is really only an agency instrumentality.(Case Law: R.G. Films Ltd.)
  • Conflict with Public Policy: Where the conduct conflicts with public policy, Courts lifted the corporate veil for protecting the public policy. (Case Law: Connors Bros. v. Connors)
  • Enemy Character: A company will be regarded as having enemy character, if the persons having de facto control of its affairs are resident in an enemy country or, wherever they may be, are acting under instructions from or on behalf of the enemy. (Case Law: Daimler Co. Ltd. v. Continental Tyre & Rubber Co.)
  • Evasion of taxes: Where it was found that the sole purpose for which the company was formed was to evade taxes the Court will ignore the concept of separate entity and make the individuals concerned liable to pay the taxes which they would have paid but for the formation of the company.(Case Law: Sir Dinshaw Maneckjee Petit, Vodafone case)
  • Avoidance of welfare legislation: Avoidance of welfare legislation is as common as avoidance of taxation and the approach in considering problems arising out of such avoidance has necessarily to be the same and, therefore, where it was found that the sole purpose for the formation of the new company was to use it as a device to reduce the amount to be paid by way of bonus to workmen, the Supreme Court upheid the piercing of the veil to look at the real transaction. (Case Law: The Workmen Employed in Associated Rubber Industries Limited)
  • Unjust and inequitable: Where it is found that a company has abused its corporate personality for an unjust and inequitable purpose, the Court would not hesitate to lift the corporate veil. Space to write important points for revision

Question 11. Comment on the following:

The privilege of Limited Liability for Business Debts is one of the principal advantage of doing business under the corporate form of organization with some exceptions.

Answer:

“The privilege of limited liability for business debts is one of the principal advantages of doing business under the corporate form of organisation.” The company, being a separate person, is the owner of its assets and bound by its liabilities. The liability of a member as shareholder, extends to the contribution to the capital of the company up to the nominal value of the shares held and not paid by him. Members, even as a whole, are neither the owners of the company’s undertakings, nor liable for its debts.

Exceptions to the principle of limited liability:

  • Members are severally liable in certain cases- If at any time the number of members of a company is reduced, in the case of a public company, below seven, in the case of a private company, below two, and the company carries on business for more than six months while the number of members is so reduced, every person who is a member of the company during the time that it so carries on business after those six months and is cognizant of the fact that it is carrying on business with less than seven members or two members, as the case may be, shall be severally liable for the payment of the whole debts of the company contracted during that time, and may be severally sued therefor. [Section 3A]
  • Where a company has been got incorporated by furnishing any false or incorrect information or representation or by suppressing any material fact or information in any of the documents or declaration filed or made for incorporating such company or by any fraudulent action, the Tribunal may, on an application made to it, on being satisfied that the situation so warrants, direct that liability of the members of such company shall be unlimited. [Section 7(7)(b)]
  • Further under section 339(1), where in the course of winding up it appears that any business of the company has been carried on with an intent to defraud creditors of the company or any other persons or for any fraudulent purpose, the Tribunal may declare the persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business in the manner aforesaid as personally liable, without limitation of liability, for all or any of the debts/liabilities of the company. [Section 339]
  • Under Section 35(3), where it is proved that a prospectus has been issued with intent to defraud the applicants for the securities of a company or any other person or for any fraudulent purpose, every person who was a director at the time of issue of the prospectus or has been named as a director in the prospectus or every person who has authorized the issue of prospectus or every promoter or a person referred to as an expert in the prospectus shall be personally responsible, without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the losses or damages that may have been incurred by any person who subscribed to the securities on the basis of such prospectus
  • As per section 75(1), where a company fails to repay the deposit or part thereof or any interest thereon referred to in section 74 within the time specified or such further time as may be allowed by the Tribunal and it is proved that the deposits had been accepted with intent to defraud the depositors or for any fraudulent purpose, every officer of the company who was responsible for the acceptance of such deposit shall, without prejudice to other liabilities, also be personally responsible, without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the losses or damages that may have been incurred by the depositors.
  • Section 224(5) states that where the report made by an inspector states that fraud has taken place in a company and due to such fraud any director, key managerial personnel, other officer of the company or any other person or entity, has taken undue advantage or benefit, whether in the form of any asset, property or cash or in any other manner, the Central Government may file an application before the Tribunal for appropriate orders with regard to disgorgement of such asset, property, or cash, and also for holding such director, key managerial personnel, officer or other person liable personally without any limitation of liability. Space to write important points for revision-

Practical Questions

Question 1. Six persons are the only members of Tab (Pvt.) Ltd. All of them went to USA on a pleasure trip by aeroplane. On the way, the plane crashed and all the six members died. Does Tab (Pvt.) Ltd. still exist? Decide.

Answer:

 

Company Law Introduction Pleasure trip by aeroplane

Question 2. Comment on the following:

Raman Pvt. Ltd. has only two shareholders, X and Y. All shares were fully paid-up X sold all his shares to Y and the company carries on its business activities thereafter.

Answer:

Company Law Introduction Raman Pvt Ltd

Short Notes

Question 1. Write short note on one person company.

Answer.

Company Law Introduction One Person Company

Distinguish Between

Question 2. Distinguish between Hindu Undivided Family and company.

Answer.

Company Law Introduction Hindu Undivided Family

Question 3. Discuss the new concepts relates to types of companies under companies Act, 2013.

Answer.

Company Law Introduction Conceps relates

CS Executive Program Company Law Paper Chapter 5 Charges

Chapter 5 Charges

Charge

  • A charge is a security given for securing loans or debentures by way of a mortgage on the assets of the company. As mentioned earlier, the power of the company to borrow includes the power to give security also.
  • A charge may be created either through the act of parties or by operation of law.
  • A charge created by operation of law does not require registration. But a charge croated by act of parties requires registration.
  • The charge may be in perpetuity.
  • A charge only gives a right to receive payment out of a particular property.
  • A charge is good against subsequent transferees with notice.
  • In case of charge, no personal liability is created. But where a charge is the result of a contract, there may be a personal remedy.
  • There is no such transfer of interest in the case of a charge.

Two Kinds of Charges

There are two kinds of charges, fixed or specific charge and floating charge.

Fixed Charge

A charge is called fixed or specific when it is created to cover assets which are ascertained and definite or are capable of being ascertained and defined, at the time of creating the charge e.g., land, building, or plant and machinery. A fixed charge, therefore, is a security in terms of certain specific property, and the company gives up its right to dispose off that property until the charge is satisfied.

Floating Charge

A floating charge, as a type of security, is peculiar to companies as borrowers. A floating charge is not attached to any definite property but covers property of a fluctuating type e.g., stock-in-trade and is thus necessarily equitable.

A floating charge is a charge on a class of assets present and future which in the ordinary course of business is changing from time to time and leaves the company free to deal with the property as it sees fit until the holders of charge take steps to enforce their security.

CS Executive Program Company Law Paper Chapter 5 Charges

Crystallisation of Floating Charge

A floating charge attaches to the company’s property generally and remains dormant till it crystallizes or becomes fixed. The company has a right to carry on its business with the help of assets over which a floating charge has been created till the happening of some event which determines this right. A floating charge crystallises and the security becomes fixed in the following cases:

  • when the company goes into liquidation;
  • when the company ceases to carry on its business;
  • when the creditors or the debenture holders take steps to enforce their security e.g. by appointing receiver to take possession of the property charged;
  • on the happening of the event specified in the deed.

Mortgage

  • A mortgage is the transfer of an interest in specific immoveable property for the purpose of securing the payment of money advanced or to be advanced by way of loan, an existing or future debt or the performance of an agreement which may give rise to pecuniary liability.
  • A mortgage is created by the act of the parties.
  • A mortgage requires registration under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
  • A mortgage is for a fixed term.
  • A mortgage is a transfer of an interest in specific immovable property.
  • A mortgage is good against subsequent transferees.
  • A simple mortgage carries personal liability unless excluded by express contract.
  • A mortgage is a transfer of an interest in a specific immovable property.

Registration of Charges- Section 77(1)

Any charge created

  • within or outside India,
  • on its property or assets or any of its undertakings,
  • whether tangible or otherwise, and situated in or outside India Shall be registered.
  • Particulars of charges that is being filed with Registrar of Companies is to be signed by the company creating the charge and the charge holder in Form No. CHG-1 (for other than Debentures) or Form CHG-9 (for debentures) as the case may be.
  • The Charge has to be registered within 30 days of its creation.

As per Companies (Amendment), Act, 2019

Time limit for filing charge created on or after 2.11.2018 reduced The charge should be filed within 30 days from its creation. In case of charges created on or after 2.11.2018, RoC can allow extension upto 30 days (total 60 days from date of creation of charge, on payment of prescribed additional fees.

RoC can allow further extension of 60 days on after payment of such ad valorem fees as may be prescribed – first and second proviso to Section 77(1) of Companies Act, 2013 amended vide the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019.

There is no provision to grant further extension for registration of charges. Section 87 of Companies Act, 2013 has been amended w.e.f. 2.11.2018 to provide that Central Government cannot order rectification of register of charges in such cases.

Provision in respect of charges created before 2.11.2018 Registrar can allow filing of particulars of such registration within 300 days of such creation, on payment of additional fee as prescribed.

He can grant further extension upto 6 months on payment of additional fees as may be prescribed – first and second proviso to Section 77(1) of Companies Act, 2013 amended vide the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019.

Registrar can condone delay upto 300 days on being satisfied that company had sufficient cause for not filing particulars and instrument of charge within 30 days, on payment of additional fee – Rule 4 of Companies (Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014.

If the charge is not filed within 300 days of creation, further extension could be granted by Central Government under section 87 of Companies Act, 2013 second proviso to Section 77(1) of Companies Act, 2013 as existing upto 2.11.2018 [powers delegated to Regional Director]. Now, such extension cannot be granted.

Punishment for not filing charges or giving false information Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 “(1) If any company is in default in complying with any of the provisions of this Chapter, the company shall be liable to a penalty of five lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees.”.

CS Executive Program Company Law Paper, Charges

Satisfaction of Charges

According to Section 82 read with the rules, the company shall give intimation to the Registrar of the payment or satisfaction in full of any charge within thirty days from the date of such payment or satisfaction in Form No. CHG-4 along with the fee.

The Registrar may, on an application by the company or the charge holder, allow such intimation of payment or satisfaction to be made within a period of three hundred days of such payment or satisfaction on payment of such additional fees as may be prescribed.

Notice of Charge

According to Section 80, where any charge on any property or assets of a company or any of its undertakings is registered under Section 77, any person acquiring such property, assets, undertakings or part thereof or any share or interest therein shall be deemed to have notice of the charge from the date of such registration.

The section clarifies that if any person acquires a property, assets or undertaking for which a charge is already registered, it would be deemed that he has complete knowledge of the charge from the date the charge is registered.

Consequences of Non-registration of Charge

According to Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, all types of charges created by a company are to be registered by the ROC, where they are non-compliant and are not filed with the Registrar of Companies for registration, it shall be void as against the liquidator and any other creditor of the company.

Particulars of Charges

The following particulars in respect of each charge are required to be filed with the Registrar:

  • Date and description of instrument creating charge;
  • The total amount secured by the charge;
  • Date of the resolution authorising the creation of the charge; (in case of issue of secured debentures only);
  • General description of the property charged;
  • List of the terms and conditions of the loan; and
  • Name and address of the charge holder.

Central Government can Order Rectification of Register of Charges Only When Delay was in Respect of Filing of Satisfaction of Charge or Mistake Made in Filing Charges

The Central Government can order the rectification of register on any of the | following grounds:

The Central Government on being satisfied that:

  • the omission to give intimation to the Registrar of the payment or satisfaction of a charge, within the time required under this Chapter,
  • the omission or misstatement of any particulars with respect to any such charge or modification or with respect to any memorandum of satisfaction or other entry made in pursuance of section 82 or 83, was accidental or due to inadvertence or some other sufficient cause or it is not of a nature to prejudice the position of creditors or shareholders of the company, it may, on the application of the company or any person interested and on such terms and conditions as the Central Government deems just and expedient, direct that the time for the giving of intimation of payment or satisfaction shall be extended or, as the case may require, that the omission or misstatement shall be rectified Section 87 of Companies Act, 2013 amended vide the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019.
  • Central Government cannot order rectification of register of charges if there was delay in filing of the original charge itself, beyond the specified period or extended period as allowable under section 77 of Companies Act, 2013.
  • Application for rectification can be made by company or any person interested. Thus, secured creditor (Bank or FI) can make application if the charge or its modification was not filed in time, as the secured creditor is certainly interested in registration/modification of charge. Powers to order rectification of register of charges have been delegated to Regional Director vide Notification F No. 1/6/2014 – CL. V dated 21.5.2014.

List of Important Forms

Company Law Charges List Of Important Forms

Short Notes

Question 1. Write a note on the following:

Consequences of non-registration of charge

Answer:

Company Law Charges Consequences of non-registration

Question 2. Distinguish Between

Distinguish between the following:

‘Mortgage’ and ‘charge’.

Answer:

Company Law Charges Mortage And Charge

Question 3. Distinguish between the following:

‘Notice of a charge’ and ‘satisfaction of a charge’.

Answer:

Company Law Charges Satisfaction of Charges

Descriptive Questions

Question 1. What is meant by ‘floating charge’ and how it would be crystallised?

Answer:

Company Law Charges Floating Charge

Question 2. Explain clearly the meaning of the terms ‘fixed charge’ and ‘floating charge’. State the circumstances under which a ‘floating charge’ automatically becomes ‘fixed’.

Answer:

Company Law Charges Fixed Specific Charge

Question 3. Explain whether a Floating charge attached to the company’s property generally remains dormant till it crystallizes or becomes fixed.

Answer:

A floating charge attached to the company’s property generally remains dormant till it crystallizes or becomes fixed. The company has a right to carry on its business with the help of assets over which a floating charge has been created till the happening of some event which determines this right.

Crystallization is the process by which a floating charge converts into a fixed charge. A floating charge crystallises and the security becomes fixed in the following cases:

  • when the company goes into liquidation;
  • when the company ceases to carry on its business;
  • when the creditors or the debenture holders take steps to enforce their security e.g. by appointing receiver to take possession of the property charged;
  • on the happening of the event specified in the deed.

In the aforesaid circumstances, the floating charge is said to become. fixed or to have been crystallised. Until the charge crystallises or attaches or becomes fixed, the company can deal with the property so charged in any manner it likes. Once crystallized, the security cannot be sold, and the lender may take possession of it.

Question 4. Comment on the following:

An unregistered charge shall be void against the liquidator and other creditors of the company.

Answer:

  • Under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, all types of charges created by a company are to be registered with the Registrar of Companies, where they are non-compliant and are not filed with the Registrar for registration, the charge shall be void as against the liquidator and any other creditor of the company.
  • In the case of ONGC Ltd v. Official Liquidators of Ambica Mills Co Ltd (2006), the ONGC had not been able to point out whether the so called charge, on the basis of which it was claiming preference as a secured creditor, was registered or not.
  • It was held that in the light of this failure, ONGC could not be treated as a secured creditor.
  • This does not, however, mean that the charge is altogether void and the debt is not recoverable. So long as the company does not go into liquidation, the charge is good and may be enforced.
  • Void against the liquidator means that the liquidator, on winding up of the company, can ignore the charge for the purpose of ascertaining the priority of payment and can treat the concerned creditor as an unsecured creditor. The property will be treated as free of charge i.e. the creditor cannot sell the property to recover its dues.
  • Void against any other creditors of the company means that if any subsequent charge is created on the same property and the earlier charge is not registered, the earlier charge would have no consequence and the latter charge if registered would enjoy priority over the earlier charge.
  • Hence, non-filing of particulars of a charge as required under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013 does not invalidate the charge against the company as a going concern.
  • It is void only against the liquidator and the creditors at the time of liquidation. The company itself cannot have a cause of action arising out of non-registration.

Question 5. Comment on the following:

An encumbrance may be created by a charge, pledge or a mortgage.

Answer:

An encumbrance means a restriction imposed on the owner’s right over his property. All the three words (charge, mortgage and pledge) used above impose a restriction on the right of the owner over his own property.

  • Charge: As per Clause 16 of Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, charge means an interest or lien created on the property or assets of a company or any of its undertakings or both as security and includes a mortgage.
    • A charge is called fixed or specific when it is created to cover assets which are ascertained and definite or are capable of being ascertained and defined, at the time of creating the charge whereas a floating charge is not attached to any definite property but covers property of a fluctuating type such as stock in trade.
    • On the contrary, in case of a fixed or a floating charge the possession of the assets remains with the borrower. The ownership of the property also remains with the borrower.
    • In case of fixed charge he has no right to sell or transfer the asset except with the consent of the charge holder.
    • In case of a floating charge the borrower can treat his floating assets as if they have not been charged.
    • He loses this right only when he commits a default and the charge holder decides to take action for recovery of the money due. In the above case we say the floating charge crystallizes.
  • Mortgage: A mortgage is the transfer of an interest in specific immoveable property for the purpose of securing the payment of money advanced or to be advanced by way of loan, an existing or future debt or performance of an agreement which may give rise to pecuniary liability.
  • Pledge: In a pledge the borrower loses possession of the goods pledged as a security for repayment of a debt or performance of an obligation. The pledgor remains the owner of the property. He is entitled to get back
    • Although, in all these cases if the borrower commits a default in payment of the principal and interest thereof the lender gets a right to sell the property and recover the amount due to him.
    • Hence, an encumbrance may be created by a charge, pledge or a mortgage.

Question 6. As a Company Secretary, explain the procedure of satisfaction of charge.

Answer:

  • Under Section 82 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 8 of the Companies (Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014, the company shall give intimation to the ROC of the payment or satisfaction in full of any charge within a period of 30 days from the date of such payment or satisfaction in Form No.CHG-4 along with the prescribed fees.
  • The Registrar may, on an application by the company or the charge holder, allow such intimation of payment or satisfaction to be made within a period of three hundred days of such payment or satisfaction on payment of such additional fees as specified.
  • On receipt of intimation of satisfaction of charge, the Registrar of Companies (ROC) shall issue a notice to the holder of the charge calling upon him to show cause within such time not exceeding 14 days, as may be specified in such notice, as to why payment or satisfaction in full should not be recorded as intimated to the Registrar of Companies. (ROC).
  • If no cause is shown, by such holder of the charge, the RoC shall order that a memorandum of satisfaction shall be entered in the register of charges maintained by the RoC under Section 81 of the Companies Act and shall inform the company.
  • Although, if the cause is shown to the Registrar, he shall record a note to that effect in the register of charges and shall inform the company accordingly.
  • Further, Proviso to Section 82(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 states that the aforesaid notice shall not be required to be sent, in case intimation to the Registrar of Companies (ROC) in this regard is in the specified form along with the Letter of the charge holder stating that the amount has been satisfied, which is a compulsory attachment in all cases of CHG-4 and is signed by the holder of charge.
  • Where the Registrar of Companies (ROC) enters a memorandum of satisfaction of charge in full, he shall issue a certificate of registration of satisfaction of charge in Form No.CHG-5. Space to write important points for revision-

Practical Questions

Question 1. Rose Ltd. raised a loan from a State financial institution by creating hypothecation of book debts and also future debts of the company. Incidentally, the charge was not registered with the Registrar of Companies concerned.

State financial institution demanded a certificate of registration of charge for the amount of loan so granted by it. The directors of the company replied to the State financial institution that the charge need not be registered for hypothecation of book debts. Is the action of the directors valid? Give reasons.

Answer:

Company Law Charges Requirement of Registration of Charge

Question 2. XYZ Limited has office building in London. The company has been granted a term loan of 15 crore from a Bank. The company wants to mortgage office building of London. Examining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, answer the following:

  1. Whether the company can mortgage the above office building?
  2. Whether a charge can be created for property situated outside India? 

Answer:

Company Law Charges Provision of Section 77

Question 3. The authorised share capital of Shine Ltd. is 50 lakh. The paid-up capital of the company is 20 lakh. The Board of Directors at its 100th meeting held in the residence of Managing Director of the company resolved to create charge on uncalled share capital of 30 lakh. With reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 ascertain if the resolution is valid. 

Answer:

  • A loan taken by a company may be secured by a charge on uncalled capital; A company does not have implied power of charging its uncalled share capital and a company may charge its uncalled capital if its articles or memorandum authorise it to charge it.
  • The memorandum may give an express power to charge uncalled capital, or the power may be so wide that it can be inferred by implication. In Newton v. Debenture holders of Anglo-Australian Investment Co., (1895) A.C. 224, the memorandum authorised the company to borrow “upon any security of the company”.
  • It was held that the power was wide enough to include a charge on uncalled capital.
  • In present case the company may take a loan secured by charge on uncalled capital only if the article or memorandum of the company so permits.

Question 4. XYZ Limited has an office building in London. The Company has been granted a term loan of 15 crore from a Bank. The Company wants to mortgage office building of London. Examining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, answer the following:

  1. Whether the company can mortgage the above office building?
  2. Whether a charge can be created for property situated outside India?

Answer:

Registration of Charges:

As per Section 77(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 and read with Rule 3 of the Companies (Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014, it shall be the duty of every company creating a charge within or outside India, on its property or assets or any of its undertakings, whether tangible or otherwise, and situated in or outside India, to register the particulars of the charge signed by the company and the charge-holder together with the instruments, if any, creating or modifying such charge in Form No.

CHG-1 (for other than Debenture) or Form No. CHG-9 (For Debentures) as the case may be, and is need to be filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within a period of 30 days of the date of creation or modification of charge along with the specified fees.

  • In the above provisions, XYZ Limited can mortgage the office building situated in London (UK).
  • In the above provisions, a charge can be created for property situated outside India. The e-form prescribed for the purpose of Registration of the charge is Form No. CHG-1 and it will be filled within the prescribed period.

Short Notes

Question 1. Write short note on Particulars of Charge.

Answer:

The following particulars in respect of each charge are required to be filed with the Registrar:

  • date and description of instrument creating charge;
  • total amount secured by the charge;
  • date of the resolution authorising the creation of the charge; (in case of issue of secured debentures only);
  • general description of the property charged;
  • list of the terms and conditions of the loan; and
  • name and address of the charge holder.

Distinguish Between

Question 2. What is the difference between Charge and Pledge?

Answer:

According to the generally accepted definition, a ‘pledge’ is a bailment of personal property as security for some debt or engagement, redeemable on certain terms, and with an implied power of sale on default. It consists of a delivery of goods by a debtor to his creditor as security for a debt or other obligation, to be held until the debt is repaid along with interest or other obligation of the debtor is discharged, and then to be delivered back to the pledger, the title not being changed during the continuance of the pledge.

Unlike a pledge, a ‘charge’ is not a transfer of property of one to another. It is a right created in favour of one, referred to as “the lender” in the immovable property of another, referred to as “the borrower”, as security for repayment of the loan and payment of interest on the terms and conditions contained in the loan documents evidencing charge.

Both a pledge and a charge are the result of voluntary act of parties. Both create security but the nature of the security is different. -Space to write important points for revision-

Descriptive Questions

Question 3. State the procedure to be adopted by the company for satisfaction of a registered charge.

Answer:

Satisfaction of Charges

According to Section 82 read with the rules, the company shall give intimation to the Registrar of the payment or satisfaction in full of any charge within a period of thirty days from the date of such payment or satisfaction in Form No. CHG-4 along with the fee.

The Registrar may, on an application by the company or the charge holder, allow such intimation of payment or satisfaction to be made within a period of three hundred days of such payment or satisfaction on payment of such additional fees as may be prescribed.

On receipt of such intimation, the Registrar shall issue a notice to the holder of the charge calling a show cause within such time not exceeding fourteen days, as to why payment or satisfaction in full should not be recorded as intimated to the Registrar.

If no cause is shown, by such holder of the charge, the Registrar shall order that a memorandum of satisfaction shall be entered in the register of charges maintained by the registrar under section 81 and shall inform the company. If the cause is shown to the Registrar shall record a note to that effect in the register of charges and shall inform the company accordingly.

However the aforesaid notice shall not be sent, in case intimation to the registrar is in specified form and is signed by the holder of charge. [Proviso to Section 82(2)]

Question 4. State the procedure to be followed by a for company for registration of charge.

Answer:

If a company has passed special resolutions under Section 180(2) authorising its Board of directors to borrow funds for the requirements of the company and under Section 180(1)(a), authorising its Board of directors to create charge on the assets and properties of the company to provide security for repayment of the borrowings in favour of the financial institutions/banks or lenders and in exercise of that authority has signed the loan documents and now proposes to have the charge, created it should follow the procedure detailed below:

  • Where the special resolution as required under Section 180 is passed, Form MGT-14 of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 is to be filed with the Registrar.
  • According to Section 77, every company creating any charge created within or outside India on property or assets or any of the company’s undertakings whether tangible or otherwise, situated in or outside India shall have to be registered. For the purpose of creating/ modifying a charge file particulars of the charge with the concerned Registrar of Companies within thirty days of creating the Form No. CHG-1 (for other than Debentures) or Form No. CHG-9 (for debentures including rectification), as the case may be.
  • Attach the following documents with e-Form No. CHG-9/CHG-1:
    • A certified true copy of every instrument evidencing any creation or modification of charge;
    • In case of joint charge and consortium finance, particulars of other charge holders;
    • Instrument(s) evidencing creation or modification of charge in case of acquisition of property which is already subject to charge together with the instrument evidencing such acquisitions.
  • Payment of fees can be made online in accordance with Annexure ‘B’ of. Companies (Registration offices and fees) Rules, 2014. Electronic payments through internet can be made either by credit card or by internet banking facility.
  • If the particulars of charge cannot be filed within thirty days due to unavoidable reasons, then it may be filed within three hundred days of such creation after payment of such additional fee as prescribed under Annexure ‘B’ of Companies (Registration offices and fees) Rules, 2014.
  • Such application for delay to the Registrar shall be made in Form No. CHG-1 and supported by a declaration from the company signed by its secretary or director that such belated filing shall not adversely affect rights of any other intervening creditors of the company.
  • Where a charge is registered Registrar will issue a certificate of registration of such charge in Form No. CHG-2. Where the particulars of modification of charge are registered the Registrar shall issue a certificate of modification of charge in Form No. CHG-3.
  • A company shall within a period of thirty days from the date of the payment or satisfaction in full of any charge registered, give intimation of the same to the Registrar in Form No. CHG-4 along with the fee as prescribed under Annexure ‘B’ of Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.
  • Where the Registrar enters a memorandum of satisfaction of charge in full, obtain a certificate of registration of satisfaction of charge in Form No. CHG-5.
  • Incorporate changes in relation to creation, modification and satisfaction of charge in the register of charges maintained by the company in Form No. CHG.7 and enter therein particulars of all the charges registered with the Registrar on any of the property, assets or undertaking of the company and the particulars of any property acquired subject to a charge as well as particulars of any modification of a charge and satisfaction of charge. Such register is to be kept at the registered office of the company.
  • All the entries in the register shall be authenticated by a director or the secretary of the company or any other person authorised by the Board for the purpose.
  • The register of charges shall be preserved permanently and the instrument creating a charge or modification thereon shall be preserved for a period of eight years from the date of satisfaction of charge by .he company.
  • Where the satisfaction of the charge is not filed with the Registrar within thirty days from the date on such payment of satisfaction, an application for condonation of delay shall be filed with the Central Government in Form No. CHG-8 along with the fee as prescribed under Annexure ‘B’ of Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.
  • Where the instrument creating or modifying a charge is not filed with the Registrar within a period of three hundred days from the date of its creation (including acquisition of a property subject to a charge) or modification an application for condonation of delay shall be filed with the Central Government in Form No. CHG-8 along with the fee as prescribed under Annexure ‘B’ of Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.
  • The order passed by the Central Government shall be required to be filed with the Registrar in Form No. INC.28 along with the fee as per the conditions stipulated in the said order.
  • For all other matters other than condonation of delay, application shall be made to the Central Government in Form No. CHG-8 along with the fee.

Question 5. Draft resolution for creating a charge on the company’s assets and properties.

Answer:

Resolution under Section 180(1)(a) for creating charge on company’s assets and properties

  • To consider and, if thought fit, to pass with or without modification(s), the following as Special Resolution;
    • “Resolved that consent of the Company be and is hereby accorded in terms of Section 180(1) (a) and other applicable provisions, if any, of the Companies Act, 2013 or any modification or re-enactment thereof, to mortgaging and/or charging by the Board of directors of the Company by way of equitable and/or legal mortgage on such immovable and movable properties of the Company, both present and future, together with power to takeover the assets of the Company in certain events, to or in favour of Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI).
    • The Industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd. (IFCI) by way of first pari passu Charge to secure the Rupee Term Loans of 1000.00 lacs and 880.00 lacs respectively granted to the Company together with interest at the agreed rate(s), liquidated damages, front end fees, premia on pre payment, costs, charges, expenses and all other moneys payable by the Company under the Loan Agreements, Deeds of Hypothecation and other documents executed/to be executed by the Company in respect of the Term Loans of IDBI and IFCI.
    • Resolved further that the Board of directors be and is hereby authorised and shall always be deemed to have been authorised to finalise with IDBI and IFCI the documents for creating the aforesaid mortgage and/ or charge and to do all acts, deeds and things as may be necessary for giving effect to the above resolution.”
  • To consider and, if thought fit, to pass with or without modification(s), the following as Special Resolution;
    • “Resolved that consent of the Company be and is hereby accorded in terms of Section 180(1)(a) and other applicable provisions, if any, of the Companies Act, 2013 or any modification or re-enactment thereof, to mortgaging and/or charging by the Board of directors of the Company by way of equitable and/or legal mortgage on such immovable and movable properties of the Company, both present and future, in favour of State Bank of India.
    • New Delhi the Company’s Bankers by way of Second Charge to secure the various fund based/non-fund based credit facilities granted/to be granted to the Company and the interest at the agreed rate, costs, charges, expenses and all other moneys payable by the Company under the Deed(s) of Hypothecation and other documents executed/to be executed by the Company in respect of credit facilities of State Bank of India, in such form and manner as may be acceptable to State Bank of India.
    • Resolved further that the Board of directors be and is hereby authorised and shall always be deemed to have been authorised to finalise with State Bank of India the documents for creating the aforesaid mortgage and/or charge and to do all acts, deeds and things as may be necessary for giving effect to the above resolution.”

CS Executive Program Company Law Paper Chapter 4 Debt Capital

Debt Capital

Borrowing

All companies are given the power to borrow by their articles which fix the maximum limit of borrowings.

Power to borrow

The power to borrow monies and to issue debentures (whether in or outside India) can only be exercised by the Directors at a duly convened meeting.

Ultra vires borrowings

Where the company borrows without the authority conferred on it by the Articles or beyond the amount set out in the Articles, it is an ultra vires borrowing and hence void.

Ultra vires borrowings cannot even be ratified by a resolution passed by the company in a general meeting. In case of ultra vires borrowings the lender has the following remedies: (a) Injunction and Recovery, (b) Subrogation, (c) Suit against Directors.

Debenture

A debenture is a document given by a company under its seal as evidence of a debt to the holder usually arising out of a loan and most commonly secured by a charge.

CS Executive Program Company Law Paper Chapter 4 Debt Capital

Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017

In Section 2 in clause (30), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely: “Provided that-

  • the instruments referred to in Chapter III-D of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; and
  • such other instrument, as may be prescribed by the Central Government in consultation with Reserve Bank of India, issued by a company, shall not be treated as debenture.”

Kinds of debentures

Debentures may be of different kinds, viz. redeemable debentures, registered and bearer debentures, secured and unsecured or naked debentures, and convertible debentures.

Debenture stock

A debenture stock is a borrowed capital consolidated into one mass for the sake of convenience.

Debenture Redemption Reserve

Section 71(4) of the Act requires every company to create a debenture redemption reserve account to which an adequate amount shall be credited out of its profits available for payment of dividends until such debentures are redeemed and shall utilize the same exclusively for the redemption of a particular set or series of debentures only.

Appointment of Debenture Trustees

Section 71(5) read with Rule 18(2) of aforesaid rules, provide that a company before making an issue of a prospectus or an offer or inviting the public or members to more than 500 persons, shall appoint one or more debenture trustees. The names of the debenture trustees shall be stated in the letter of offer inviting subscription for debentures and also in all the subsequent notices or other communications sent to the debenture holders. Before the appointment of a debenture trustee or trustees, written consent shall be obtained from such debenture trustee.

Duties of Debenture Trustees

Section 71(6) read with Rule 18(3) of aforesaid rules provides that a debenture trustee shall take steps to protect the interests of the debenture holders and redress their grievances.

It shall be the duty of every debenture trustee to

  • satisfy himself that the letter of offer does not contain any matter which is inconsistent with the terms of the issue of debentures or with the trust deed;
  • satisfy himself that the covenants in the trust deed are not prejudicial to the interest of the debenture holders;
  • call for periodical status or performance reports from the company;
  • inform the debenture holders immediately of any breach of the terms of the issue of debentures or covenants of the trust deed;
  • ensure the implementation of the conditions regarding the creation of security for the debentures, if any, and debenture redemption reserve;

Debenture trust deed

A debenture trust deed is a document created by the company, whereby debenture trustees are appointed to protect the interest of Debenture holders before they are offered for public subscription.

Company

The company may accept deposits from its members by passing a resolution in a general meeting and subject to conditions as may be prescribed in the Rules including Credit rating, Deposit insurance,, etc.

Eligible company

Eligible company public company may accept deposits, if it has a net worth of not less than 100 crores or a turnover of not less than 500 crore and has obtained the prior consent of the company in a general meeting using a special resolution and also filed the said resolution with the Registrar of Companies and where applicable, with the Reserve Bank of India before making any invitation to the Public for acceptance of Deposits.

Deposit trustees

No company under sub-section (2) of section 73 or any eligible company shall issue a circular or advertisement inviting secured deposits unless the company has appointed one or more deposit trustees to create security for the deposits.

Deposit insurance

Amendment made by companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 Contract providing for deposit insurance at least thirty days before the issue of circular or advertisement.

In Section 73 of the principal Act, in sub-Section (2),-clause (d) shall be omitted;

Foreign investment

Repatriation Capital flows from a foreign country to the country of origin. This usually refers to returning returns on foreign investment in the case of a corporation or transferring foreign earnings home in the case of an individual.

List of Important Forms

Company Law Debt Capital List Of Important Forms

Debt Capital Distinguish Between

Question 1. Distinguish between the following:

‘Debentures’ and ‘shares’.

Answer:

Company Law Debt Capital Debentures and shares

Debt Capital Descriptive Questions

Question 1. Comment on the following:

Issue of unsecured debentures by a company to another company, where the debentures have an option for compulsory conversion into equity shares within seven years, cannot be termed as deposits.

Answer:

Company Law Debt Capital Analysis of the present case

Question 2. Define the term ‘deposits’ and list the receipts of money that are not considered deposits.

Answer:

As per Section 2(31) of the Companies Act, 2013 “deposit” includes any receipt of money by way of deposit or loan or in any other form by a company, but does not include such categories of amount as may be prescribed in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India.

“Deposit” includes any receipt of money by way of deposit or loan or in any other form, by a company, but does not include:

  • Any amount received from the Central Government or a State Government, any amount received from any other source whose repayment is guaranteed by the Central Government or a State Government any amount received from a local authority, or any amount received from a statutory authority constituted under an Act of Parliament or a State Legislature;
  • Any amount received from foreign governments, foreign or international banks, multilateral financial institutions (including, but not limited to, International Finance Corporation, Asian Development Bank, Commonwealth Development Corporation, and International Bank for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction), foreign governments development financial institutions, foreign export credit agencies, foreign collaborators, foreign bodies corporate and foreign citizens, foreign authorities or persons resident outside India subject to the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and rules and regulations made there under;
  • Any amount received as a loan or facility from any banking company or the State Bank of India or any of its subsidiary banks or from a banking institution notified by the Central Government under Section 51 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, or a corresponding new bank as defined in clause (d) of Section 2 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, or in clause (b) of Section (2) of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 or from a co-operative bank as defined in clause (b-ii) of Section 2 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934;
  • Any amount received as a loan or financial assistance from Public Financial Institutions notified by the Central Government on this behalf in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, or any regional financial institutions or Insurance Companies or Scheduled Banks as defined in the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934;
  • Any amount received against the issue of commercial paper or any other instruments issued by the guidelines or notification issued by the Reserve Bank of India;
  • Any amount received by a company from any other company; (vii) any amount received and held under an offer made by the provisions of the Act towards a subscription to any securities, including share application money or advance towards allotment of securities pending allotment, so long as such amount is appropriated only against the amount due on allotment of the securities applied for.
  • Any amount received from a person who, at the time of the receipt of the amount, was a director of the company. The director from whom money is received, furnishes to the company at the time of giving the money, a declaration in writing to the effect that the amount is not being given out of funds acquired by him by borrowing or accepting loans or deposits from others;
  • Any amount raised by the issue of bonds or debentures secured by a first charge or a charge ranking pari passu with the first charge on any assets referred to in Schedule III of the Act excluding intangible assets of the company or bonds or debentures compulsorily convertible into shares of the company within ten years. If such bonds or debentures are secured by the charge of any assets referred to in Schedule Ill of the Act excluding intangible assets, the amount of such bonds or debentures shall not exceed the market value of such assets as assessed by a registered valuer;
  • Any amount received from an employee not exceeding his annual salary, under a contract of employment with the company like non-interest-bearing security deposit;
  • Any non-interest-bearing amount received or held in trust;
  • Any amount received in the course of or for the business of the company:
    • As an advance for the supply of goods or provision of services provided that such advance is appropriated against the supply of goods or provision of services within a period of three hundred and sixty-five days from acceptance of such advance. In case of any advance which is the subject matter of any legal proceedings before any Court of law, the said time limit of three hundred and sixty-five days shall not apply.

CS Executive Program Company Law Paper

    • As advance, accounted for in any manner whatsoever, received in connection with consideration for an immovable property under an agreement or arrangement, provided that such advance is adjusted against the property, by the terms of agreement or arrangement.
    • As a security deposit for the performance of the contract for the supply of goods or provision of services.
    • As advance received under long-term projects for supply of capital goods except those covered under item (b) above. if the amount received under (a), (b) and (d) above becomes refundable (with or without interest) because the company accepting the money does not have the necessary permission or approval to deal in the goods properties, or services for which the money is taken, the amount received shall be deemed to be a Deposit under these rules.
  • Any amount brought in by the promoters of the company by way of an unsecured loan in pursuance of the stipulation of any lending financial institution or a bank subject to fulfillment of the following conditions:
    • The loan is brought in pursuance of the stipulation imposed by the lending institutions on the promoters to contribute such finance; and
    • The loan is provided by the promoters themselves by their relatives or by both and
    • The exemption under this sub-clause shall be available only till the loans of financial institutions or banks are repaid and not thereafter.
  • Any amount accepted by a Nidhi Company by the rules made under Section 406 of the Act.

Question 3. Comment on the following:

A private company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 may issue debentures to any number of persons and can accept deposits from the public.

Answer:

  • According to the definition of a private company under Section 2(68), a private limited company may not make an invitation to the public to subscribe to any securities of the company. However, under Section 42 read with Section 2(68), it may issue such security to any person (number of persons not exceeding 200).
  • In terms of provisions of Section 73(2) read with Exemption Notification dated 5th June 2015, a private company may accept from its members monies not exceeding one hundred percent of the aggregate of the paid-up share capital and free reserves, subject to the passing of a resolution in general meeting and subject to such rules as may be prescribed in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, accept deposits from its members on such terms and conditions, as may be agreed upon between the company and its members, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions, as provided under the Act. -Space to write important points for revision

Question 4. Comment on the following:

A private limited company can accept deposits from its members under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

A private limited company can accept deposits from its members by Section 73 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the rules made thereunder. Moreover, the Government has exempted the private companies vide notification dated 13th June 2017, from applicability of Section 73(1)(a) to (e).

Accordingly, a private company may accept deposits from its members:

  • not exceeding one hundred percent of the aggregate of the paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account; or
  • is a start-up, for five years from the date of its incorporation; or
  • if it full all of the following conditions, namely:
    • is not an associate or a subsidiary company of any other company;
    • if the borrowings of such a company from banks or financial institutions or any body corporate is less than twice its paid-up share capital or fifty crore rupees, whichever is lower; and
    • such a company has not defaulted in the repayment of such borrowings subsisting at the time of accepting deposits under this section:

Provided that the company referred to in clause (A), (B), or (C) shall file the details of monies accepted to the Registrar in such manner as may be specified.

Question 5. Comment on the following:

A public company may issue secured irredeemable debentures.

Answer:

  • A Debenture, in which no time is fixed for the company to pay back the money, is an irredeemable debenture.
  • As per Rule 18(1)(a) Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 an issue of secured debenture may be made for a period of redemption not exceeding ten years from the date of issue. In the case of certain companies such redemption period may exceed ten years but not exceed thirty years.
  • After the commencement of the Companies Act, 2013, no company either public or private can issue perpetual or irredeemable debentures.

A private company and a banking company can freely accept deposits.

Answer:

Rule 1(3) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rule, 2014 made under Sections 73 and 76 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rule, 2014 shall apply to a company other than

  • a banking company;
  • a non-banking financial company as defined in the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 registered with the Reserve Bank of India;
  • a housing finance company registered with the National Housing Bank established under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987; and
  • a company specified by the Central Government under the proviso to sub-Section (1) of Section 73 of the Act.

Accordingly, the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 2014 does not apply to banking companies. Hence, a banking company can freely accept deposits.

A private company is allowed to accept deposits from its members subject to fulfillment of conditions provided under Section 73(2)(a) to (e) of the Companies Act, 2013.

However, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide the notification dated 13th June 2017 provides that Section 73(2)(a) to (e) shall not apply to the following classes of private companies.

  • which accepts from its member’s monies not exceeding one hundred percent of the aggregate of the paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account; or
  • which is a start-up, for five years from the date of its incorporation; or
  • which fulfills all of the following conditions, namely:-
    • which is not an associate or a subsidiary company of any other company;
    • if the borrowings of such a company from banks or financial institutions or anybody corporate is less than twice its paid-up share capital or fifty crore rupees, whichever is lower; and
    • such a company has not defaulted in the repayment of such borrowings subsisting at the time of accepting deposits under this section:

The company referred to in clauses (A), (B), or (C) shall file the details of monies accepted to the Registrar in Form DPT-3.

Question 6. Concerning the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the rules framed there under, state the disqualifications for a Debenture Trustee. Explain whether the following persons can be appointed as Debenture Trustees.

  1. A relative of the whole-time director of the company.
  2. A shareholder who has no beneficial interest.

Answer:

Section 71 of the Companies Act 2013, read along with rule 18(2) of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 provides that a person shall not be appointed as a debenture trustee if he

  • beneficially holds shares in the company;
  • is a promoter, director, or key managerial personnel or any other officer or an employee of the company or its holding, subsidiary, or associated company;
  • is beneficially entitled to money which is to be paid by the company otherwise than as remuneration payable to the debenture trustee;
  • is indebted to the company, or its subsidiary its holding or associated company, or a subsidiary of such holding company;
  • has furnished any guarantee in respect of the principal debts secured by the debentures or interest thereon;
  • has any pecuniary relationship with the company amounting to two percent or more of its gross turnover or total income or fifty lakh rupees or such higher amount as may be prescribed, whichever is lower, during the two immediately preceding financial years or the current financial year;
  • is relative to any promoter or any person who is employed by the company as a director or key managerial personnel.

Accordingly, the explanations to the questions would be as under:

  • A relative of the whole-time director of the company (KMP) cannot be appointed as a debenture trustee.
  • A shareholder who has no beneficial interest can be appointed as a debenture trustee.

Question 7. What are the disqualifications for debenture trustees?

Answer:

Rule 18 of the Companies (Share Capital & Debentures) Rules, 2014, provides that the disqualifications for debenture trustees are as under:

  • Beneficially holds shares in the company;
  • Is a promoter, director or key managerial personnel or any other officer or an employee of the company or its holding, subsidiary, or associate company;
  • Is beneficially entitled to money which is to be paid by the company otherwise than as remuneration payable to the debenture trustee;
  • Is indebted to the company, or its subsidiary its holding or associate company, or a subsidiary of such holding company;
  • Has furnished any guarantee in respect of the principal debts secured by the debentures or interest thereon;
  • Has any pecuniary relationship with the company amounting to 2% or more of its gross turnover or total income or fifty lakh rupees or such higher amount as may be prescribed, whichever is lower, during the two immediately preceding financial years or the current financial year;
  • Is relative of any promoter or any person who is in the employment by the company, as a director, or as a key managerial personnel. Space to write important points for revision-

Question 8. Comment on the following:

A private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, may issue debentures to any number of persons and can accept deposits from the public.

Answer:

Definition of Private Company and Securities:

A private company has been defined under Section 2(68) of the Companies Act, 2013, as a private limited company that is prohibited from making an invitation to the public to subscribe to any securities of the company.

‘Securities’ has been defined under Section 2(81) of the Companies Act, 2013 to mean the securities as defined in Section 2(h) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956. As per Section 2(h) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, “Securities” include debentures, debenture stock, or other marketable securities of a like nature.

However, under Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013, a Private Company may issue such securities on a private placement basis only to a selected group of persons who have been identified by the Board of Directors, and whose number shall not exceed 200 (two hundred) in the aggregate in a financial year excluding the qualified institutional buyers (IB) and employees of the company being offered securities under a scheme of employees stock options subject to prescribed conditions.

Further, as per Sections 73 and 76 of the Companies Act, 2013, only the. following may invite, accept, or renew public deposits from the public:

  • a banking company
  • non-banking financial company (NBFC) as defined in the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934
  • to such other company as the Central Government may, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), specify on this behalf,
  • Public company (Eligible Company) having a Net worth not less than * 100 Crores or a Turnover not less than 500 Crores and which has obtained the prior consent of the company in a general meeting using a resolution and also filed the said resolution with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) before making any invitation to the Public for acceptance of deposits.

So, a Private Company cannot accept deposits from the public. -Space to write important points for revision

Debt Capital Practical Questions

Question 1. Ajay Ltd. borrowed 100 crore from Prem, without the authority conferred on it by the articles of association. Later, the money borrowed by Ajay Ltd. was used by its Board of directors to pay off lawful debts of the company. In this scenario, Prem, the lender seeks your advice for the recovery of his money. Advise him.

Answer:

Company Law Debt Capital Ultra vires borrowing

Question 2. The balance sheet of Duck Ltd. shows a paid-up capital of 5 crore and free reserves of 2 crore. Due to the heavy financial requirements of the company, it plans to apply for a loan of 8 crore with XYZ Bank Ltd. Advise the company on the formalities required to be fulfilled. Also advise on the alternative course of action, if any.

Answer:

Company Law Debt Capital Borrowing power of the company

Question 3. Sun-beam Ltd. failed to pay interest on repayment of deposits. One depositor approached the consumer forum with the request to issue an order against the company for payment of interest on deposits. The company contended that the consumer forum was not a proper authority to issue such directions. Advise the company suitably.

Answer:

Company Law Debt Capital Analysis of given problem

Question 4. Prism Ltd. has accepted 10 lakh as an advance towards the supply of goods to certain parties. As per the agreement, the company will supply the goods after two years from the date of deposit. Later on, internal auditors qualified their report on the ground that the company had violated the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Directors explained that this is required to complete the order. Examining the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 state whether the explanation given by the directors is justified.

Answer:

Company Law Debt Capital Section 2(31)

Question 5. The Board of Directors of Green Field Ltd. decides to accept deposits from the public at a compound interest rate of 12% per annum. Examining the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, advise whether the Board can go ahead with its proposal.

Answer:

Company Law Debt Capital Section 73(2)

Question 6. Suresh, a member of Ruchi Ltd., wants to inspect the register of deposits maintained by the company as required under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. The company refused to provide the register for inspection without assigning any reason. Referring to the provisions of the Act, examine the validity of the company’s refusal. What shall be your answer if the same Register is demanded by the statutory auditors of the company for inspection and audit?

Answer:

Company Law Debt Capital Rule 14 of Companies

Question 7. A company has taken a term loan from a financial institution and is regularly paying the loan installments and interest. The financial institution proposes to convert 20% of the loan into equity shares of the company as per the terms of the agreement. Advise the company, whether the financial institution can enforce such a convertibility clause. Also, examine the validity of such a clause.

Answer:

Section 62(3) states the provisions of Section 62 shall not apply to the increase of the subscribed capital of the company caused by the exercise of an option as a term attached to the debentures issued or loan raised by the companies to convert such debentures/loan into the shares in the company. Further, the terms of the issue of such debentures or loans containing such an option should have been approved before the issue of such debentures or raising of loans by a special resolution passed by the company in the General Meeting.

Thus, in the given case, if the raising of a loan is already approved by the shareholders by special resolution, then the financial institution can enforce the convertibility.

Question 8. KAJ Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 wants to go for the issue of secured debentures. Referring to relevant provisions and Rules, state the conditions to be satisfied before the company goes for such issue of debentures. Will your answer be different in case such an issue of debentures is by a Government company where the Central Government has given a guarantee?

Answer:

Section 71(2) states that no company shall issue any debentures carrying any voting rights. Secured Debentures to comply with terms and conditions prescribed Section 71(3) states that Secured Debentures may be issued by a company subject to such terms and conditions as may be prescribed. Rule 18(1) of Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014, prescribes the following conditions;

The company shall not issue secured debentures, unless it complies with the following conditions, namely:

  • An issue of secured debentures may be made, provided the date of its redemption shall not exceed ten years from the date of issue. A company engaged in the setting up of infrastructure projects may issue secured debentures for a period exceeding ten years but not exceeding thirty years;
  • such an issue of debentures shall be secured by the creation of a charge, on the properties or assets of the company, having a value that is sufficient for the due repayment of the amount of debentures and interest thereon;
  • the company shall appoint a debenture trustee before the issue of prospectus or letter of offer for subscription of its debentures and not later than sixty days after the allotment of the debentures, execute a debenture trust deed to protect the interest of the debenture holders; and
  • the security for the debentures by way of a charge or mortgage shall be treated in favor of the debenture trustee on-
    • any specific movable property of the company (not being like the pledge); or
    • any specific immovable property wherever situated, or any interest therein.

In the case of a non-banking financial company, the charge or mortgage may be created on any movable property. Further in case of any issue of debentures by a Government company that is fully secured by the guarantee given by the Central Government or one or more State Governments or by both, there is no requirement for the creation of a charge under this sub-rule.

In case of any loan taken by a subsidiary company from any bank or financial institution, the charge or mortgage may also be created on the properties or assets of the holding company.

Question 9. Fun and Frolic Ltd. has received 5 lakh from its Promoters as unsecured Joan in pursuance of the stipulation of credit facilities from the Bank. Can the company accept the unsecured loan? What would be your answer if the company has repaid in full its amount of credit facilities and after such repayment, the company continues this unsecured loan? Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 advise the company.

Answer:

According to Rule 2 of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposit) Rules, 2014 any amount brought in by the promoters of the company by way of an unsecured loan in pursuance of the stipulation of any lending financial institution or a bank, shall not be treated as deposit, subject to fulfillment of the following conditions, namely:

  • the loan is brought in pursuance of the stipulation imposed by the lending institutions on the promoters to contribute such finance;
  • the loan is provided by the promoters themselves by their relatives or by both; and
  • the exemption under this sub-clause shall be available only till the loans of financial institution or bank are repaid and not thereafter;

Accordingly, in the case of Fun and Frolic Ltd., 5 Lakhs may be accepted from the Promoters, as the same is in pursuance of the stipulation of credit from the bank. Once the credit facilities are paid in entirety and the company continues to retain the unsecured loan, it shall be treated as a deposit under the Companies Act, 2013.

Question 10. IOL, a manufacturing company, issued partly convertible debentures with 36 crores a few years back. The convertible option is only for 50% of the issue and debentures are redeemable in the current financial year. What is the quantum of Debenture Redemption Reserve (DDR) required to be created by the company now and how much should be deposited or invested by the company? 

Answer:

  • Section 71(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 18(7) of the Companies (Share Capital & Debentures) Rules, 2014 provides for the creation of a Debenture Redemption Reserve (DRR) out of the profits of the company available for payment of dividend. The amount credited to such account shall not be utilized by the company except for the redemption of debentures.
  • The provisions for the creation of DRR for manufacturing companies are 25% of the value of outstanding debentures issued through the public issue as per present SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008, and also 25% DRR is required in the case of privately placed debentures by listed companies. For unlisted companies issuing debentures on a private placement basis, the DRR will be 25% of the value of outstanding debentures.
  • Every company required to create a Debenture Redemption Reserve shall on or before the 30th day of April in each year, be required to invest or deposit a sum that shall not be less than 15% of the amount of debentures maturing during the current financial year ending 31st March of next year.
  • In case of partly convertible debentures, a Debenture Redemption Reserve shall be created in respect of non- convertible portion of the debenture issue by this rule.
  • Since, only 50% of the debentures are convertible, for the non-convertible part the DRR is required to be created. Thus, only 3 crores worth of debentures DRR is required. Hence, 25% of 3 crores is 75 lakhs to be created as DRR and 45 Lakhs (15%) deposited in the invested bank account or securities, etc. during the current financial year.

Question 11. Arup entered into a transaction with Brilliant Merchandise Ltd. for a contract worth 51 lakh. The Articles of Association of the company stipulate that a contract above 25 lakh should be approved by a meeting of the Board of Directors.

Anjaan, Deputy General Manager (Commercial) produces a forged document which shows a resolution approving the contract having been passed in a Board Meeting. Later, the forgery is discovered. Arup pleads that his contract with the company is protected by the Doctrine of Indoor Management. Will Arup succeed?

Answer:

The doctrine of Constructive Notice protects a company from outsiders. The doctrine provides that an outsider must read the Memorandum and Articles of the Company and satisfy himself that the contract he is seeking to enter into with the company is within its powers.

As far as internal procedures are concerned, an outsider is entitled to presume that everything has been done according to the procedures laid down and there is no irregularity. An outsider cannot find out what is going on inside the doors as the doors of management are closed. This is called the doctrine of Indoor Management [also known as the rule in Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856) CI & B 327].

However, in certain exceptional situations, the doctrine of indoor management is not applicable and one of them is when a person relies on a forged document. Nothing can validate forgery. A company cannot be held liable for forgery committed by its officers. This has been established in the case Ruben v. Great Fingall Consolidated case [1906] 1 AC 439.

In the above case, Arup has relied on a forged document. Therefore he will not be protected and he will not succeed in his pleading.

Question 12. The following information as per the latest balance sheet figures as of 31 March 2019 is made available to you:

Company Law Debt Capital Paid-up

The company has not accepted any deposits as of now. The Board of Directors wants to know what is the maximum amount it can accept by way of deposits from (1) members and (2) the public. Advise them.

Answer:

As per Rule 3(4) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, no eligible company can accept or renew-

  • any deposit from its members, if the amount of such deposit together with the number of deposits outstanding as on the date of acceptance or renewal of such deposits from members exceeds 10% of the aggregate of the paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account of the company.
  • any other deposit, if the amount of such deposit together with the amount of such other deposits, other than the deposit referred to in clause (a), outstanding on the date of acceptance or renewal exceeds 25% of the aggregate of the paid-up share capital, free reserves and securities premium account of the company.

In the above case, as the net worth of the company exceeds 100 crore, the company is assumed to be an eligible company. Further, the aggregate of the paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account is 220 crores and the company has not accepted any deposits as of now. Accordingly, from the members, the eligible company can accept upto 10% of 220 crores i.e. 22 crores. From the public, it can accept upto 25% of 220 crores i.e. 55 crores.

Question 13. ABC Products Ltd. has taken a term loan of * 5 crores from the bank and has given the properties situated in the Maldives as prime security of the loan. Can the company give the properties situated outside India for security of loan? Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, discuss.

Answer:

The Companies Act, 2013 does not limit a company to give any property situated in India or outside India. An inference can be drawn from Section 77(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, which permits the registration of charges created on a property situated in or outside India.

Section 77(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, provides that it shall be the duty of every company creating a charge within or outside India, on its property or assets or any of its undertakings, whether tangible or otherwise, and situated in or outside India, to register the particulars of the charge signed by the company and the charge-holder together with the instruments, if any, creating/modifying such charge in Form CHG-1/CHG-9, as the case may be, and is required to be filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within 30 days of the date of creation or modification of charge along with the specified fees.

Hence, ABC Products Ltd. can give the properties situated in the Maldives for the security of a term loan.

Debt Capital Short Notes

Question 1. Write a short note on the following:

  1. Ultra virus borrowing
  2. Intra virus borrowing
  3. Debenture stock

Answer:

  • Where a company borrows without the authority conferred on it by the articles or beyond the amount set out in the Articles, it is an ultra vires borrowing. Any act which is ultra vires the company is void. In such a case the contract is void and the lender cannot sue the company for the return of the loan. The securities given for such ultra-vires borrowing are also void and inoperative.
  • Ultra vires borrowings cannot even be ratified by a resolution passed by the company in a general meeting. However, equity assists the lender where the common law fails to do so. If the lender has parted with his money to the company under an ultra vires borrowing, and is, therefore, unable to sue for its return or enforce any security granted to him, he nevertheless has, in equity, the following remedies:
    • Injunction and Recovery: Under the equitable doctrine of restitution he can obtain an injunction provided he can trace and identify the money lent, and any property which the company has bought with it. Even if the monies advanced by the lender cannot be traced, the lender can claim repayment if it can be proved that the company has benefited thereby.
    • Subrogation: Where the money of an ultra vires borrowing has been used to pay off lawful debts of the company, he would be subrogated to the position of the creditor paid off and to that extent would have the right to recover his loan from the company. Subrogation is allowed for the simple reason that when a lawful debt has been paid off with an ultra vires loan, the total indebtedness of the company remains the same. By subrogating the ultra vires lender, the Court can protect him from loss, while the debt burden of the company is in no way increased.
    • Suit against Directors: In the case of ultra vires borrowing, the lender may be able to sue the directors for breach of warranty of authority, especially if the directors deliberately misrepresented their authority.
  • A distinction should always be made between a company’s borrowing powers and the authority of the directors to borrow. Where the directors borrowed money beyond their authority and the borrowing is not ultra vires the company, such borrowing is called Intra vires borrowing but outside the Scope of Agents’ Authority.
  • The company will be liable to such borrowing if the borrowing is within the directors’ ostensible authority and the lender acted in good faith or if the transaction was ratified by the company.
  • Where the borrowing is intra vires the company but outside the authority of the directors e.g. where the articles provide that the directors shall have the power only up to 100 lacs and prior approval of the shareholders would be required to borrow beyond 100 lacs; any borrowing beyond 100 lacs without shareholders approval i.e. intra vires borrowing by the company but outside the authority of directors can be ratified by the company and become binding on the company.
  • The company would be liable, particularly if the money has been used for the benefit of the company.
  • Here the legal position is quite clear. The company has the power or capacity to borrow, but the authority of the directors is restricted either by the articles of the company or by the statute, and they have exceeded it.
  • A company, instead of issuing debentures, each in respect of a separate and distinct debt, may raise one aggregate loan fund or composite stock known as ‘debenture stock’.
  • Accordingly, a debenture stock is a borrowed capital consolidated into one mass for the sake of convenience.
  • Instead of each lender having a separate bond or mortgage, he has a certificate entitling him to a certain sum being a portion of one large loan.
  • It is generally secured by a trust deed. As in the case of shares, a person may subscribe for, or transfer any amount even a fraction amount.
  • Debenture stock is the indebtedness itself, and the debenture stock certificate furnishes evidence of the title or interest of the holder in the indebtedness.
  • A debenture is a document that furnishes evidence of the debt. Debenture stock must be fully paid, while debenture may or may not be fully paid.

Debt Capital Descriptive Questions

Question 2. Is it compulsory to maintain a Debenture Redemption Reserve Account? If yes, how?

Answer:

Section 71(4) read Rule 18(7) of aforesaid rules provides that when debentures are issued by a company, the company shall create a debenture redemption reserve account (DRR) out of the profits of the company available for payment of dividends. The amount credited to such account shall not be utilized by the company except for the redemption of debentures.

Quantum of Debenture Redemption Reserve

DRR is not required to be created for the convertible part of partly convertible debentures. The provisions for creation of DRR for various classes of companies are as follows:

Company Law Debt Capital Class of Company

Every company required to create DRR is required to invest or deposit at least 15% of the debentures maturing during the current financial year ending 31st March of next year.

The company may choose any of the below-given methods:

  • in deposits with any scheduled bank, free from any charge or lien;
  • in unencumbered securities of the Central Government or of any State Government;
  • in unencumbered securities mentioned in sub-clauses (a) to (d) and (ee) of Section 20 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882;
  • in unencumbered bonds issued by any other company which is notified under sub-clause (f) of Section 20 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882;
  • the amount invested or deposited as above shall not be used for any purpose other than for redemption of debentures maturing during the year referred above: The amount remaining invested or deposited, as the case may be, shall not at any time fall below fifteen percent of the amount of the debentures maturing during the year ending on the 31s day of March of that year;

Question 3. What are the duties of debenture trustees?

Answer:

It shall be the duty of every debenture trustee to

  • satisfy himself that the letter of offer does not contain any matter which is inconsistent with the terms of the issue of debentures or with the trust deed;
  • satisfy himself that the covenants in the trust deed are not prejudicial to the interest of the debenture holders;
  • call for periodical status or performance reports from the company;
  • communicate promptly to the debenture holders defaults, if any, about payment of interest or redemption of debentures and action taken by the trustee therefor;
  • appoint a nominee director on the Board of the company in the event of-
    • two consecutive defaults in payment of interest to the debenture holders; or
    • default in the creation of security for debentures; or
    • default in the redemption of debentures.
  • ensure that the company does not commit any breach of the terms of issue of debentures or covenants of the trust deed and take such reasonable steps as may be necessary to remedy any such breach;
  • inform the debenture holders immediately of any breach of the terms of the issue of debentures or covenants of the trust deed;
  • ensure the implementation of the conditions regarding the creation of security for the debentures, if any, and debenture redemption reserve;
  • ensure that the assets of the company issuing debentures and of the guarantors, if any, are sufficient to discharge the interest and principal amount at all times and that such assets are free from any other encumbrances except those which are specifically agreed to by the debenture holders;
  • do such acts as are necessary in the event the security becomes enforceable;
  • call for reports on the utilization of funds raised by the issue of debentures;
  • take steps to convene a meeting of the holders of debentures as and when such meeting is required to be held;
  • ensure that the debentures have been converted or redeemed by the terms of the issue of debentures; -Space to write important points for revision

Question 4. What is the procedure for accepting deposits from numbers?

Answer:

The procedure to accept deposits from members can be summarized as under:-

  • The companies intending to invite deposits from its members shall convene a Board meeting to consider and Approve the business to propose and accept deposits from members and decide the day, date, time, and place of the general meeting.
  • Issue notice of general meeting to the members of the company.
  • Hold the general meeting and pass a resolution for acceptance of deposits.
  • Comply with the Rules prescribed in consultation with RBI and terms and conditions mutually agreed by the company and deposit holders either for acceptance or for repayment of deposits.
  • Issue circular to the members of the company including therein a statement showing the financial position of the company, the credit rating obtained, the total number of depositors, and the amount due towards depositors in respect of any previous deposits and such other particulars as may be prescribed. These details indicate the soundness of the company or a warning about the risks involved. The circular shall be published at least once in the English language in a leading English newspaper and vernacular language in a vernacular newspaper having wide circulation in the State in which the registered office of the company is situated.
  • File the copy of the aforesaid circular in Form DPT-1 along with such statement with the Registrar within thirty days before the date of issue of circular.
  • In case, a company does not secure the deposits or secures such deposits partially, then, the deposits shall be termed “unsecured deposits” and shall be so quoted in every circular, form, advertisement, or any document related to invitation or acceptance of deposits.
  • A company inviting secured deposits shall provide for security by way of a charge on its assets for the due repayment of the amount of deposit and interest thereon. The company shall submit Form CHG-1 with the Registrar for assets other than intangible assets. Secured deposits including interest thereon can in no case exceed the market value of the charged assets assessed by the registered valuer.
  • After the expiry of 30 days of filing Form DPT-1, the circular in Form DPT-1 along with the application form is sent to all members by registered post with acknowledgement due/speed post/electronic mail.
  • Collect duly signed application forms along with money from the members.
  • Issue receipts of deposits within 21 days of the receipts of money/realization of cheque.
  • Maintain a register of deposits at its registered office which shall contain the details as prescribed under Rule 14 Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 from the date of such acceptance.
  • Pay interest as per the rate proposed on agreed terms.
  • Deposit such sum which shall not be less than twenty percent of the amount of its deposits maturing during the financial year and the financial year following and keep it in a separate bank account called a deposit repayment reserve account.
  • Certification that the Company has not committed any default in the repayment of deposits accepted either before or after the commencement of this Act or payment of interest on such deposits and where a default had occurred, the company made good the default and a period of five years had elapsed since the date of making good the default
  • Submit the return of deposits in Form DPT-3 on or before 30th June each year for information as of 31st March of the respective year.

Transfer And Transmission Of Securities Under Companies Act, 2013

Transfer And Transmission Of Securities

Transfer of securities Under Companies Act, 2013

As per Section 56(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, a company, whether public or private shall not register transfer of securities of the company unless a proper instrument of transfer duly stamped, dated and executed by or on behalf of the transferor and transferee has been delivered to the company along with the certificate relating to the securities or if no such certificate is in existence, along with the related letter of allotment of securities.

  • Transfer takes place by a voluntary act of the transferor.
  • An instrument of transfer is required in case of transfer.
  • Transfer is a normal course of transferring property.
  • Transfer of securities is generally made for some consideration.
  • Stamp duty is payable on transfer of securities by a holder of securities.

Depository system Under Companies Act, 2013

Depository system reduces the cost of issue and transfer of securities by eliminating stamp duty, it entitles the transferee to all the rights associated with the securities immediately on settlement of purchase transaction.

Transfer And Transmission Of Securities Under Companies Act, 2013

Fungibility Under Companies Act, 2013

A good or asset’s interchangeability with other individual goods/assets of the same type. Assets possessing this property simplify the exchange/trade process, as interchangeability assumes that everyone values all goods of that class as the same.

Stamp duty Under Companies Act, 2013

The tax placed on legal documents usually in the transfer of assets or property. The transfer of documents in locations where this law exists, is only legally enforceable once they are stamped, which shows the amount of tax paid.

Transmission of Securities Under Companies Act, 2013

  • Transmission of Securities refers to those cases where a person acquires an interest in securities by operation of any provision of law, such as by right of inheritance or succession or by reason of the insolvency or lunacy of the holder of securities or by purchase in a Court-sale.
  • Transmission is the result of the operation of law.
  • No instrument of transfer is required in case of transmission.
  • Transmission takes place on death or insolvency of a holder of securities.
  • Transmission of securities is generally made without any consideration.
  • No stamp duty is payable on transmission of securities.

Lien on shares Under Companies Act, 2013

Lien on shares is the right to retain possession of a thing until a claim is satisfied. In the case of a company lien on a share means that the member would not be permitted to transfer his shares unless he pays his debt to the company.

Blank Transfer Under Companies Act, 2013

When a shareholder signs the transfer form without filling in the name of the transferee and the date of execution and hands it over with the share certificate to the transferee thereby enabling the transferee to deal with the shares, he is said to have made a transfer ‘in blank’ or a ‘blank transfer’.

Forged Transfer Under Companies Act, 2013

  • A forged transfer is a nullity and therefore, the original owner of the shares continues to be the shareholder and the company is bound to restore his name on the register of members [People’s Ins. Co. v. Wood and Co., 1961 (31) Com Cases 61].
  • A forged document never has any legal effect. It can never move ownership from one person to another, however, genuine it may appear.

Dematerialisation of Shares Under Companies Act, 2013

  • Dematerialisation of securities means holding of securities in electronic form in lieu of physical certificates. Dematerialisation is comparable to keeping your money in a bank account.
  • In demat form, physical share certificates are replaced by electronic book entries; purchase of shares are reflected as credits in demat account and sales are reflected as debits.
  • The risk associated with physical share certificates such as loss, replacement, theft, damage, etc. are overcome in the share certificates held in Dematerialisation form which are totally risk free.

Rematerialisation of Securities Under Companies Act, 2013

Rematerialisation is conversion of electronic securities into physical certificates of such securities. This can be done in the following manner:

  • Beneficial owner sends request to DP.
  • DP intimates Depository (NSDL or CDSL) of such request electronically.
  • Depository confirms rematerialisation request to the company’s Share Transfer Agents.
  • Share Transfer Agent updates accounts, prints certificates and confirms the Depository.
  • Depository updates accounts and downloads the details to the DP.
  • Share Transfer Agent dispatches certificates to holder thereof.
  • The DP also sends intimation about rematerialisation to its client.

Transfer And Transmission Of Securities Short Notes

Write a note on the following:

Fungibility

Answer:

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Fungibility

Write a note on the following:

A forged transfer of shares is a nullity.

Answer:

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities A forged transfer

Transfer And Transmission Of Securities Distinguish Between

Distinguish between the following:

‘Beneficial owners under depository mode’ and ‘registered owners under depository mode’.

Answer:

 

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Difference between Registered owner and Beneficial owner

Distinguish Between the following:

‘Transfer’ and ‘transmission’ of shares.

Answer:

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Difference between Transfer of shares and Transmission of shares

Transfer And Transmission Of Securities Descriptive Questions

What are the benefits of the depository system of stock holding?

Answer:

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Advantages of Depository system

Examine the validity of transfer and transmission of shares in favour of a minor under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Transfer and Transmission of shares

Aniket has fraudulently sold his shares to two different transferees. Who will be entitled to the shares in priority?

Answer:

  • Referring to Society General De Paris v. Jonet Walker and other (1886) it was held that where a shareholder has fraudulently sold his shares to two different transferees, the first purchaser will, on the ground of time alone, be entitled to the shares in priority to the second.
  • Applying the case here, the first purchaser will be entitled to the shares in priority.

The Articles of Association of a company cannot impose a blanket ban prohibiting transfer of shares in favour of a minor. Such a restriction is unreasonable and not sustainable.

Answer:

  • The Articles of Association of a company cannot impose a blanket ban prohibiting transfer of shares in favor of a minor, as such a restriction is unreasonable and not sustainable. Section 44 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that shares in a company are movable property and are transferable in the manner provided by the Articles.
  • The expression “in the manner provided by the articles of association the company” can only be interpreted to mean the procedure to be opted for transfer and impose restrictions, which are meaningful and reasonable.. In case, the restriction imposed on transfer to a minor is accepted, it would mean that the shares of a deceased member can never be inherited by the legal heir who might be a minor.
  • This would lead to a highly unjust situation and cannot be accepted as tenable.
  • Accordingly, if the shares can be transmitted in favour of a minor, there is no reason why the shares which are fully paid -up and in respect of which no financial liability devolves on the minor are to be held as not transferable merely because of the ban imposed in the Articles of Association [Saroj v. Britannia Industries Ltd., Appeal No.5/80 decided 14.12.81 by CLB).

Transfer And Transmission Of Securities Practical Questions

Mohan applied for 4,000 shares in a company but no allotment was made to him. Subsequently, 4,000 shares were transferred to him without his request and his name was entered in the register of members. Mohan stood by and allowed his name to remain in the register of members. Subsequently, the company went into liquidation and he was held liable as a contributory. Now, Mohan wants to apply to the Tribunal for rectification of the register of members. Can he do so? Explain.

Answer:

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Register being a prima of evidence

An employee of a company purchased certain shares of his company through a member of a stock exchange and lodged with the company an application for transfer of shares in his (employee’s) name. The company refused to execute the transfer on the suspicion that the employee, if admitted as a member of the company, will create nuisance in general meetings and seek access to the records of the company. Decide giving reasons –

  • Whether the company’s contention shall be tenable; and
  • What is the remedy available to the employee in the given case?

Answer:

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Securities are freely transferable

P Realtors Ltd., A Construction Ltd. and five other individuals have incorporated XYZ Builders Ltd. to construct a commercial complex. P Realtors Ltd. and A Construction Ltd. have executed an agreement according to which none of these companies can sell their shares in the new company before completion of construction of the commercial complex. Due to financial crunch, P Realtors decides to sell its shares in XYZ Builders Ltd. to PQR Builders Ltd. Can A Construction Ltd. restrain the transfer of shares before completion of construction of the commercial complex? (3 marks)

Answer:

With reference to the definition of a private company as provided under Section 2 (68) of the Companies Act, 2013, a private company is only authorised to exercise restriction by its Articles on the transfer of shares of the company held by its members.

In other words, in public companies the shares are freely transferable and no restrictions can be imposed on the members right regarding transfer of their shares.

In the above case the agreement between P Realtors Ltd. and A Construction Ltd restricting their rights to transfer their shares till completion of the project will be held subservient to the provision contained in the Companies Act, 2013, which provide for free transferability of shares.

Hence, A Construction Ltd. will not be able to restrain P Realtors from transferring their shares in XYZ Builders Ltd. to PQR Builders Ltd.

Santosh Kumar, an employee of a listed company purchased certain shares of his company through a member of a stock exchange and lodged with the company for transfer of shares in his (employee’s) name. The company refused to execute the transfer on the suspicion that the employee, if admitted as a member of the company, will create nuisance in general meetings and seek access to the records of the company. Decide giving reasons:

  • Whether the company’s contention shall be tenable; and
  • What is the remedy available to the employee in the given case?

Answer:

The securities or other interest of any member in a public company are freely transferable (it means, no restriction on transfer of share from one person to another person). Refusal to register share transfer on suspicion that the employee if admitted as a member will attend general meetings of the company and may create nuisance by raising irrelevant issues and also get access to the records to the company as a shareholder is not a valid reason.

Therefore, as per Section 58 (4) of the Companies Act, 2013, if a public company without sufficient cause refuses to register the transfer of securities within a period of 30 days from the date on which the instrument of transfer is delivered to the company, the transferee may, within period of 60 days of such refusal or where no intimation has been received from the company, within 90 days of the delivery of the instrument of transfer, can appeal to the Tribunal.

Therefore, taking into account the above:

  • The refusal by the company to register the transfer shares in the name of the employee is not tenable.
  • Employee in this case can go for appeal to the Tribunal against the company’s refusal.

Transfer And Transmission Of Securities Short Notes

Question 1. Write short notes on Rematerialisation of securities.

Answer:

Rematerialisation is conversion of electronic securities into physical certificates of such securities. This can be done in the following manner:

  • Beneficial owner sends request to DP.
  • DP intimates Depository (NSDL or CDSL) of such request electronically.
  • Depository confirms rematerialisation request to the company’s Share Transfer Agents.
  • Share Transfer Agent updates accounts, prints certificates and confirms the Depository.
  • Depository updates accounts and downloads the details to the DP.
  • Share Transfer Agent dispatches certificates to holder thereof.
  • The DP also sends intimation about rematerialisation to its client.

Question 2. Write short notes on Dematerialisation of securities.

Answer:

Dematerialisation of securities means holding of securities in electronic form in lieu of physical certificates. Dematerialisation is comparable to keeping your money in a bank account. In demat form, physical share certificates are replaced by electronic book entries; purchase of shares are reflected as credits in demat account and sales are reflected as debits.

The risk associated with physical share certificates such as loss, replacement, theft, damage, etc. are overcome in the share certificates held in Dematerialisation form which are totally risk free.

Transfer And Transmission Of Securities Descriptive Questions

Question 3. Enumerate the steps for transfer of dematerialised shares.

Answer:

Section 7 of the Depositories Act, 1996 lays down that every depository shall, on receipt of intimation from a participant, register the transfer of shares in the name of the transferee and where the beneficial owner or a transferee of any shares seeks to have custody of such shares, the depository shall inform the issuer accordingly.

The transfer deed and all other provisions stipulated in Section 56 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall not apply to the transfers affected within the depository mode.

No stamp duty is levied on transfer of securities held in demat form. Any number of securities can be transferred/ delivered with one delivery instruction. Therefore, the paperwork and signing of multiple transfer forms is done away with.

The procedure for sale of shares held in demat form is as under:

  • Sale shall be made through a broker who is a member of National Stock Exchange;
  • Shareholder, i.e., the beneficial owner (BO) will give delivery instruction through Delivery Instruction Slip (DIS) to depository participant (DP) to debit his account and credit the broker’s account. Such instruction should reach the DP’s office at least 24 hours before the pay-in, failing which, DP will accept the instruction only at the BO’s risk;
  • The broker shall give instructions to his DP for delivery to clearing corporation of the concerned stock;
  • exchange and receive payment from clearing corporation.

The broker shall make payment to the investor in physical form. The procedure for purchases of securities held in demat form is as under:

  • broker will receive the securitias in his account on the payout day;
  • broker will give instruction to is depository participant to debit his account and credit beneficial o vner’s account;
  • BO will give ‘Receipt Instruction’ to DP for receiving credit by filling appropriate form. However, BO can give standing instruction for credit to his account that will obviate the need of giving Receipt Instruction every time.

Question 4. Enumerate the steps for hypothecation of dematerialised shares.

Answer:

A beneficial owner may, with the prior approval of the depository, pledge or hypothecate his shares held in a depository. Upon receipt of intimation from the beneficial owner about the pledge or hypothecation of his shares, the depository shall accordingly make entries in its records.

Such an entry in the records of a depository shall be evidence of a pledge or hypothecation [Section 12]. Both the pledger and pledgee must have a depository account. The procedure for pledge or hypothecation of shares held in demat form is as under:

  • Investor shall submit the details of shares to be pledged to the DP in the prescribed format.
  • DP shall verify the records and on being satisfied that the shares are available for pledge, make a note in the records and forward the application to the Depository for approval.
  • Depository shall obtain confirmation from pledgee and record the pledge within 15 days of application.
  • Depository shall send intimation to the DP of both the pledger and pledgee who will inform the pledger and pledgee respectively.
  • The pledgee may invoke the pledge in accordance with the terms of pledge and on such invocation the name of pledgee is entered in the Register of Beneficial Owners by the Depository.
  • During the period the pledge is in force, the DP shall not give effect to transfer of any security without the concurrence of the pledgee.
  • On closure of the loan, the pledger shall request the DP to close the pledge. The pledgee, on getting payment, shall make a request for closure of pledge to his DP.
  • For making hypothecation of shares held in demat form the above procedure is to be followed. However, before registering the hypothecatee as a beneficial owner, the Depository should obtain the consent from the hypothecator.

Question 5. How does investor avail the services of depositary.

Answer:

  • In the case of existing securities:
    • An investor before availing the services of a depository, shall enter into an agreement with the depository through a participant and then shall surrender security certificates to the issuer. The issuer on receipt of security certificate shall cancel them and substitute in its records the name of the depository as the registered owner in respect of that security and inform the depository accordingly. The depository shall thereafter enter the name of the investor in its records as beneficial owner.
  • In the case of fresh issue:
    • At the time of initial offer the investor would indicate his choice in the application form. If the investor opts to hold a security in the depository mode, the issuer shall intimate the concerned depository about the details of allotment of a security made in the favour of investors and records the depository as registered owner of the securities.
    • On receipt of such information, the depository shall enter in its records the names of allottees as the beneficial owners. In such case a prior agreement by the investor with the depository as well as an agreement between the issuer company and depository may be necessary.
  • In the case of exit from the depository:
    • If a beneficial owner or a transferee of a security desires to take away a security from depository, he shall inform the depository of his intention. The depository in turn shall make appropriate entries in its records and inform the issuer. The issuer shall make arrangements for the issue of certificate of securities to the investor within 30 days of the receipt of intimation from the depository.
  • In the case of transfer within the depository:
    • The depository shall record all transfers of securities made among the beneficial owners on receipt of suitable intimation to the effect that a genuine purchase transaction has been settled.
  • In the case of pledge:
    • Before creation of any pledge or hypothecation in respect of a security, the beneficial owner is required to obtain prior approval of the depository and on creation of pledge or hypothecation; the beneficial owner shall give intimation of such pledge or hypothecation to the depository. The depository shall make appropriate entries in its records which will be admissible as evidence.

Question 6. Describes the process of the company to be followed by on refusal to register the transfer of securities.

Answer:

Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013, deals with process of the company to be followed by on refusal to register the transfer of securities.

  • If a private company limited by shares refuses (whether in pursuance of any power of the company under its articles or otherwise), to register the transfer of, or the transmission of the right to any securities or interest of a member in the company, then the company shall send notice of the refusal to the transferor and the transferee or to the person giving intimation of such transmission, within a period of thirty days from the date on which the instrument of transfer, or the intimation of such transmission, was delivered to the company. Notice shall contain the reasons for refusal to register the transfer or transmission.
  • The transferee may appeal to the Tribunal against the refusal within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the notice or in case no notice has been sent by the company, within a period of sixty days from the date on which the instrument of transfer or the intimation of transmission, was delivered to the company.[Section 58(3)]
  • If a public company without sufficient cause refuses to register the transfer of securities within a period of thirty days from the date on which the instrument of transfer or the intimation of transmission, is delivered to the company, the transferee may, within a period of sixty days of such refusal or where no intimation has been received from the company, within ninety days of the delivery of the instrument of transfer or intimation of transmission, appeal to the Tribunal. .[Section 58(4)]
  • The Tribunal, while dealing with an appeal may, after hearing the parties, either dismiss the appeal, or by order-
  • direct that the transfer or transmission shall be registered by the company and the company shall comply with such order within a period of ten days of the receipt of the order; or
  • direct rectification of the register and also direct the company to pay damages, if any, sustained by any party aggrieved.[Section 58(5)]
  • If a person contravenes the order of the Tribunal he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term not less than one year but may extend to three years and with fine not less than one lakh rupees which may extend to five lakh rupees.[Section 58(6)]

Buy Back Of Securities Under Companies Act, 2013

Buy Back Of Securities And Reduction Of Share Capital

Buy-back of shares Under Companies Act, 2013

The repurchase of shares by a company in order to reduce the number of shares on the market. Companies will buy back shares either to increase the value of shares still available (reducing supply) or to eliminate any threats by shareholders who may be looking for a controlling stake.

Reduction of capital Under Companies Act, 2013

  • Reduction of capital means reduction of issued, subscribed or paid-up share capital of the company. Various modes of reduction have been laid down in the Companies Act.
  • Reduction of share capital is governed by the provisions of Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013.
  • Reduction of share capital is required to be done by special resolution.
  • Reduction of share capital is to be confirmed by the Tribunal.

Surrender of shares Under Companies Act, 2013

Surrender of shares means surrender to the company on part of shareholder of shares voluntarily. It amount to reduction of capital.

Buy Back Of Securities Under Companies Act, 2013

Forfeiture of shares Under Companies Act, 2013

A company may if authorized by its articles, forfeit shares for non-payment of calls and the same will not require confirmation of the Tribunal and amounts to reduction of capital.

Diminution of capital Under Companies Act, 2013

Diminution of capital is the cancellation of the unsubscribed part of the issued capital. It can be effected by an ordinary resolution provided articles of the company authorize to do so. It does not need any confirmation of Tribunal.

Buy Back Of Securities Short Notes

Write a note on the following:

Conditions for valid forfeiture of shares

Answer:

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Conditions for valid forfeiture of shares

Buy Back Of Securities Descriptive Questions

Answer the following citing the relevant provisions of law/case law, if any:

Explain the procedure for reduction of share capital.

Answer:

Reduction of Share Capital [Section 66]

  • Subject to confirmation by the Tribunal on an application by the company, a company limited by shares or limited by guarantee and having a share capital may, by a special resolution, reduce the share capital in any manner and in particular, may:
    • extinguish or reduce the liability on any of its shares in respect of the share capital not paid-up; or
    • either with or without extinguishing or reducing liability on any of its shares,
      • cancel any paid-up share capital which is lost or is unrepresented by available assets; or
      • pay off any paid-up share capital which is in excess of the wants of the company, alter its memorandum by reducing the amount of its share capital and of its shares accordingly.
  • The Tribunal shall give notice of every application made to it under sub-section (1) to the ‘Central Government, Registrar and to the Securities and Exchange Board, in the case of listed companies, and the creditors of the company and shall take into consideration the representations, if any, made to it by that Government, Registrar, the Securities and Exchange Board and the creditors within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the notice.
  • The Tribunal may, if it is satisfied that the debt or claim of every creditor of the company has been discharged or determined or has been secured or his consent is obtained, make an order confirming the reduction of share capital on such terms and conditions as it deems fit. Provided that no application for reduction of share capital shall be sanctioned by the Tribunal unless the accounting treatment, proposed by the company for such reduction is in conformity with the accounting standards specified in Section 133 or any other provision of this Act and a certificate to that effect by the company’s auditor has been filed with the Tribunal.
  • The order of confirmation of the reduction of share capital by the Tribunal under sub-Section (3) shall be published by the company in such manner as the Tribunal may direct.
  • The company shall deliver a certified copy of the order of the Tribunal under subsection (3) and of a minute approved by the Tribunal showing:
    • the amount of share capital;
    • the number of shares into which it is to be divided;
    • the amount of each share; and
    • the amount, if any, at the date of registration deemed to be paid-up on each share, to the Registrar within thirty days of the receipt of the copy of the order, who shall register the same and issue a certificate to that effect.
  • Nothing in this section shall apply to buy-back of its own securities by a company under Section 68.
  • A member of the company, past or present, shall not be liable to any call or contribution in respect of any share held by him exceeding the amount of difference, if any, between the amount paid on the share, or reduced amount, if any, which is to be deemed to have been paid thereon, as the case may be, and the amount of the share as fixed by the order of reduction.
  • Where the name of any creditor entitled to object to the reduction of share capital under this section is, by reason of his ignorance of the proceedings for reduction or of their nature and effect with respect to his debt or claim, not entered on the list of creditors, and after such reduction, the company is unable, within the meaning of sub-section (2) of Section 271, to pay the amount of his debt or claim:
    • every person, who was a member of the company on the date of the registration of the order for reduction by the Registrar, shall be liable to contribute to the payment of that debt or claim, an amount not exceeding the amount which he would have been liable to contribute if the company had commenced winding up on the day immediately before the said date; and
    • if the company is wound up, the Tribunal may, on the application of any such creditor and proof of his ignorance as aforesaid, if it thinks fit, settle a list of persons so liable to contribute, and make and enforce calls and orders on the contributories settled on the list, as if they were ordinary contributories in a winding up.
  • Nothing in sub-section (8) shall affect the rights of the contributories among themselves.
  • If any officer of the company:
    • knowingly conceals the name of any creditor entitled to object to the reduction;
    • knowingly misrepresents the nature or amount of the debt or claim of any creditor; or
    • abets or is privy to any such concealment or misrepresentation as aforesaid, he shall be liable under Section 447.

Amendments as per Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 Revised Section 447-

“Without prejudice to any liability including repayment of any debt under this Act or any other law for the time being in force, any person who is found to be guilty of fraud involving an amount of at least ten lakh rupees or one percent of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than the amount involved in the fraud, but which may extend to three times the amount involved in the fraud.

Provided that where the fraud in question involves public interest, the term of imprisonment shall not be less than three years. Provided further that where the fraud involves an amount less than ten lakh rupees or one per cent of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower and does not involve public interest, any person guilty of such fraud shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or with fine which may extend to twenty lakh rupees or with both.”

  • If a company fails to comply with the provisions of sub-section (4), it shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than five lakh rupees but which may extend to twenty-five lakh rupees.

Note: Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 Provides that the Section 66 of the principal Act, sub-section(11) shall be omitted. Space to write important points for revision

Comment on the following:

A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 does not have the right to reduce its share capital on selective basis.

Answer:

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Companies Act 2013

Comment on the following:

Reduction of share capital and Diminution of share capital mean the same.

Answer:

According to Section 66(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 states that subject to approval by the Tribunal on an application by the company, a company limited by shares or limited by guarantee and having a share capital may, by passing a special resolution at general meeting reduce the share capital in any manner, and in, particular, may-

  • extinguish or reduce the liability on any of its shares in respect of the share capital not paid-up; or
  • either with or without extinguishing or reducing liability on any of its shares,-
    • cancel any paid-up share capital which is lost or is unrepresented by available assets; or
    • pay off any paid-up share capital which is in excess of the wants of the company,

alter its memorandum of association by reducing the amount of its share capital and of its shares accordingly.

As per Section 61(1)(e) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that, a limited company having share capital, if authorised by its Articles of association may cancel shares, by passing an ordinary resolution at general meeting in that behalf, which have not been taken by any person, and diminish the amount of its share capital by the amount of the shares so cancelled.

Diminution needs no confirmation by the Tribunal. Further, Section 61(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the cancellation of shares under section 61(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall not be deemed to be reduction of share capital.

Hence, Reduction of Share Capital and Diminution of Share Capital is not the same.

Buy Back Of Securities Practical Question

Board of Directors of Pious Ltd. gives you the following information extracted from the company’s financial statements as at 31st March, 2015:

Authorised equity share capital         10 crore

(1 crore shares of 10 each)

Paid-up equity share capital              5 crore

General reserve                                 5 crore

Debenture redemption reserve        2 crore

Board of Directors by a resolution passed at its meeting decides to go for buy-back of shares of the extent of 20% of the company’s paid-up share capital and free reserves. Examine the validity of the Board’s resolution with reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

Enkebee Ltd. wants to purchase its own 1,00,000 equity shares @ 10 each out of the following:

Unsecured loan  5 lakh

Balance of depreciation reserve for 3 lakh

Securities premium account 4 lakh.

Examine the legality of the above transactions for the buy-back of securities of the company under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Answer:

According to Section 68(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, a company may purchase its own shares or other specified securities out of the following:

  • its free reserves; or
  • the securities premium account; or
  • the proceeds of any shares or other specified securities.

Hence, Enkebee Ltd. can purchase its own shares only out of the Securities Premium account and not out of unsecured loan or balance of depreciation reserve (not being free reserve).

Confident Ltd. has forfeited 50,000 equity shares of the company@10 each and same were re-issued. After the filing of the annual return, the Registrar of Companies (ROC) has issued show cause notice to the company for default of provisions of Section 39 of the Companies Act, 2013. Is the action of the ROC tenable under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013? Discuss with relevant case law, if any.

Answer:

  • Re-issue of forfeited shares does not require filing of return of allotment. In a similar case Sri Gopal Jalan & Co. v. Calcutta Stock Exchange Association Ltd., the Supreme Court held that the exchange was not liable to file any return of the forfeited shares under Section 75(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 [Corresponds to Section 39 of the Companies Act, 2013] when the same were re-issued.
  • The Court observed that when a share is forfeited and re-issued, there is no allotment, in the sense of appropriation of shares out of the authorised and unappropriated capital and approved the observations of Harries C.J. in S.M. Nandy’s case that:
  • “On such forfeiture all that happened was that the right of the particular shareholder disappeared but the shares considered as a unit of issued capital continued to exist and was kept in suspense until another shareholder was found for it”.
  • Accordingly, in the present case Show cause notice issued by RoC to Confident Ltd. fo: default of provisions of Section 39 of the Companies Act, 2013 is not tenable.

Premium Ltd. is considering buy-back of its shares without using any proceeds of shares or other specified securities. The balance sheet of Premium Ltd. shows the following status as on 31st March, 2018: Asset/Liabilities

Company Law Share Capital Issue And Allotment Of Securities Asset Liabilities

Determine the maximum quantum of buy-back of shares with the shareholders’ approval as on 1st April, 2018.

Answer:

The maximum quantum of buy-back that Premium Ltd. can make as on 1st April, 2018, in pursuance to Section 68 of Companies Act, 2013 is 25% of aggregate of paid-up capital and free reserves of the company. Further provided that the reference to twenty five per cent shall be construed with respect to its total paid-up equity capital in that financial year and the ratio of the aggregate of secured and unsecured debts owed by the company after buy-back should not be more than twice the paid-up capital and its free reserves.

Analysis of the Case Law:

Free Reserves – 5,00,000

Securities premium Account – Nil

Proceeds of other specified securities – Nil

Total Debt i.e. (7,00,000+ 15,00,000) -22,00,000

Sum of paid up Equity capital + free reserves – 15,00,000

Therefore, the maximum fund available for buy-back (in absence of securities premium account and proceeds of issue of any other specified securities) is 5,00,000.

Amount that must be maintained as sum total of free reserves and paid up equity capital is half of total debt i.e. half of 22,00,000 i.e. 11,00,000.

Buy back can be made upto 25% of Paid up capital and free reserves i.e. 10,00,000+ 5,00,000 i.e. 15,00,000 × 25% = 3,75,000. Further debt equity ratio is

Debt:

Secured and unsecured debt = 15,00,000+ 7,00,000 = 22,00,000

Capital after Buy Back:

Total Capital 10,00,000-3,75,000 = 6,25,000

Free reserve = 5,00,000-3,75,000 = 1,25,000

Total Capital + free reserve 6,25,000+ 1,25,000 = 7,50,000 Debt equity ratio = 22,00,000/7,50,000 = 2.93

The ratio being more than twice the paid-up capital and its free reserves the maximum quantum of 3,75,000 is not advisable.

As expressed above post buy-back debt equity ratio must not be more than 2. Accordingly, post buy-back total capital and free reserve must be half of debts i.e. (15,00,000+7,00,000)/2=11,00,000. The maximum buy-back of equity may be {(10,00,000+ 5,00,000) -11,00,000)/2 = 2,00,000.

Hence, in the above case, maximum possible buy-back is of  ₹ 2,00,000 amounting to 20,000 equity shares of ₹ 10 each.

Monika Ltd. wants to purchase its own 5,00,000 equity shares @ ₹10/- each out of the following:

₹ lakh

(a) Unsecured Loans              25

(b) Balance of Free Reserves  15

(c) Securities Premium Account    10

Examine the legality of the above transactions for the buy-back of securities of the company under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013

Answer:

As per Section 68(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 a company may purchase its own shares or other specified securities (known as “buy-back”) out of:

  • its free reserves; or
  • the securities premium account; or
  • the proceeds of the issue of any shares or other specified securities.

Although, no buy-back of any kind of shares or other specified securities shall be made out of the proceeds of an earlier issue of the same kind of shares or same kind of other specified securities.

Hence, in the above case Monika Ltd. can purchase its own 5,00,000 equity shares @10 each out of free reserves and from the securities premium account in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. But it cannot do buy-back from the amount of Unsecured Loan as it will be contravention of the provisions of Section 68 of the Companies Act, 2013.